吸引女性进入男性主导的行业:澳大利亚年轻女性的观点

IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Karen Struthers, G. Strachan
{"title":"吸引女性进入男性主导的行业:澳大利亚年轻女性的观点","authors":"Karen Struthers, G. Strachan","doi":"10.13152/IJRVET.6.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: The persistent low female participation in male-dominated trades is not attracting a high level of public attention and policy action.  There are determined, yet adhoc actions by advocates in response to evidence that economic benefits will be derived for industry and women through increased female participation in the male-dominated trades. Occupational segregation of the trades remains resistant to change.  \nMethods: To better understand the barriers limiting female participation in the male-dominated trades from the perspective of young women, this PhD study features interviews with female secondary students, complemented by interviews with industry stakeholders and a quantitative analysis of VET and trade participation data. The three primary research questions are: 1) What is the extent of gender segregation in vocational education and training (VET) and typically male-dominated trades in Australia, and how does this compare internationally? 2) Why do very few female students choose male-dominated trades as their job pathway? 3) What can be done, particularly in the education and training sectors, to increase female interest in, and take-up of, the male-dominated trades? \nFindings:  The results of this research showed that the composition of trade-qualified females in male-dominated trades is persistently low at 2-3%. The views of young women affirmed the evidence showing system-wide barriers limit female interest in these trades. Most influential is that gender stereotypes of work are set by Year 10 and that female enrolment in Maths (a pre-requisite for male-dominated careers) is low; these trades are seen as “jobs for the boys who don’t do academic,” and the fear of intimidation and harassment deters young women.  Low enrolment of female students in male-dominated trade courses indicates that this entrenched occupational segregation of the trades will remain resistant to change for some time to come. \nConclusion: The findings indicate that ad hoc responses to overcome gender segregation of the trades is not effective. Influenced by systems theory and a social ecological model (SEM) of change, the researchers promote the need for sustained, nation-wide awareness and action involving VET and school sectors, industry, government and trade unions to attract more women into male-dominated trades. ","PeriodicalId":37080,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attracting women into male-dominated trades: Views of young women in Australia\",\"authors\":\"Karen Struthers, G. Strachan\",\"doi\":\"10.13152/IJRVET.6.1.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Context: The persistent low female participation in male-dominated trades is not attracting a high level of public attention and policy action.  There are determined, yet adhoc actions by advocates in response to evidence that economic benefits will be derived for industry and women through increased female participation in the male-dominated trades. Occupational segregation of the trades remains resistant to change.  \\nMethods: To better understand the barriers limiting female participation in the male-dominated trades from the perspective of young women, this PhD study features interviews with female secondary students, complemented by interviews with industry stakeholders and a quantitative analysis of VET and trade participation data. The three primary research questions are: 1) What is the extent of gender segregation in vocational education and training (VET) and typically male-dominated trades in Australia, and how does this compare internationally? 2) Why do very few female students choose male-dominated trades as their job pathway? 3) What can be done, particularly in the education and training sectors, to increase female interest in, and take-up of, the male-dominated trades? \\nFindings:  The results of this research showed that the composition of trade-qualified females in male-dominated trades is persistently low at 2-3%. The views of young women affirmed the evidence showing system-wide barriers limit female interest in these trades. Most influential is that gender stereotypes of work are set by Year 10 and that female enrolment in Maths (a pre-requisite for male-dominated careers) is low; these trades are seen as “jobs for the boys who don’t do academic,” and the fear of intimidation and harassment deters young women.  Low enrolment of female students in male-dominated trade courses indicates that this entrenched occupational segregation of the trades will remain resistant to change for some time to come. \\nConclusion: The findings indicate that ad hoc responses to overcome gender segregation of the trades is not effective. Influenced by systems theory and a social ecological model (SEM) of change, the researchers promote the need for sustained, nation-wide awareness and action involving VET and school sectors, industry, government and trade unions to attract more women into male-dominated trades. \",\"PeriodicalId\":37080,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13152/IJRVET.6.1.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13152/IJRVET.6.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

背景:女性在男性主导的行业中持续的低参与度没有引起公众的高度关注和政策行动。有证据表明,通过增加女性参与男性主导的行业,将为工业和妇女带来经济利益,倡议者采取了果断而特别的行动。行业的职业隔离仍然难以改变。方法:为了从年轻女性的角度更好地了解限制女性参与男性主导行业的障碍,本博士研究对女中学生进行了访谈,并对行业利益相关者进行了访谈,并对职业教育和行业参与数据进行了定量分析。主要研究的三个问题是:1)澳大利亚职业教育和培训(VET)以及典型的男性主导行业的性别隔离程度如何,与国际上的情况相比如何?2)为什么很少有女生选择男性主导的行业作为她们的就业途径?3)可以做些什么,特别是在教育和培训部门,以提高女性对男性主导的行业的兴趣和接受程度?研究结果:本研究结果表明,在男性主导的行业中,具有贸易资格的女性的比例一直很低,仅为2-3%。年轻女性的观点证实了系统范围内的障碍限制了女性对这些行业的兴趣。最具影响力的是,工作中的性别刻板印象是在10年级确立的,女性在数学专业的入学率(这是男性主导职业的先决条件)很低;这些行业被视为“不学习的男孩的工作”,对恐吓和骚扰的恐惧使年轻女性望而却步。在男性主导的贸易课程中,女性学生的低入学率表明,这种根深蒂固的行业职业隔离在未来一段时间内仍将难以改变。结论:研究结果表明,为克服行业性别隔离而采取的特殊措施是无效的。受系统理论和社会生态模型(SEM)变化的影响,这组科学家提倡需要持续的、全国性的意识和行动,包括VET和学校部门、工业、政府和工会,以吸引更多的女性进入男性主导的行业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Attracting women into male-dominated trades: Views of young women in Australia
Context: The persistent low female participation in male-dominated trades is not attracting a high level of public attention and policy action.  There are determined, yet adhoc actions by advocates in response to evidence that economic benefits will be derived for industry and women through increased female participation in the male-dominated trades. Occupational segregation of the trades remains resistant to change.  Methods: To better understand the barriers limiting female participation in the male-dominated trades from the perspective of young women, this PhD study features interviews with female secondary students, complemented by interviews with industry stakeholders and a quantitative analysis of VET and trade participation data. The three primary research questions are: 1) What is the extent of gender segregation in vocational education and training (VET) and typically male-dominated trades in Australia, and how does this compare internationally? 2) Why do very few female students choose male-dominated trades as their job pathway? 3) What can be done, particularly in the education and training sectors, to increase female interest in, and take-up of, the male-dominated trades? Findings:  The results of this research showed that the composition of trade-qualified females in male-dominated trades is persistently low at 2-3%. The views of young women affirmed the evidence showing system-wide barriers limit female interest in these trades. Most influential is that gender stereotypes of work are set by Year 10 and that female enrolment in Maths (a pre-requisite for male-dominated careers) is low; these trades are seen as “jobs for the boys who don’t do academic,” and the fear of intimidation and harassment deters young women.  Low enrolment of female students in male-dominated trade courses indicates that this entrenched occupational segregation of the trades will remain resistant to change for some time to come. Conclusion: The findings indicate that ad hoc responses to overcome gender segregation of the trades is not effective. Influenced by systems theory and a social ecological model (SEM) of change, the researchers promote the need for sustained, nation-wide awareness and action involving VET and school sectors, industry, government and trade unions to attract more women into male-dominated trades. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
23.10%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信