Ov16快速诊断试验(RDT)和Ov16酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)在喀麦隆盘尾丝虫病不同流行区诊断的一致性

IF 2 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Relindis Ekanya , Amuam Andrew Beng , Muwah Anastacia Anim , Yokyu Zachary Pangwoh , Obie Elisabeth Dibando , Narcisse Victor Tchamatchoua Gandjui , Abong Raphael Awah , Glory N. Amambo , Gordon Takop Nchanji , Bertrand Lontum Ndzeshang , Theobald Mue Nji , Fanny Fri Fombad , Abdel Jelil Njouendou , Esum Mathias Eyong , Jerome Fru Cho , Peter A. Eyong , Kebede Deribe , Ntonifor Helen Ngum , Allison Golden , Samuel Wanji
{"title":"Ov16快速诊断试验(RDT)和Ov16酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)在喀麦隆盘尾丝虫病不同流行区诊断的一致性","authors":"Relindis Ekanya ,&nbsp;Amuam Andrew Beng ,&nbsp;Muwah Anastacia Anim ,&nbsp;Yokyu Zachary Pangwoh ,&nbsp;Obie Elisabeth Dibando ,&nbsp;Narcisse Victor Tchamatchoua Gandjui ,&nbsp;Abong Raphael Awah ,&nbsp;Glory N. Amambo ,&nbsp;Gordon Takop Nchanji ,&nbsp;Bertrand Lontum Ndzeshang ,&nbsp;Theobald Mue Nji ,&nbsp;Fanny Fri Fombad ,&nbsp;Abdel Jelil Njouendou ,&nbsp;Esum Mathias Eyong ,&nbsp;Jerome Fru Cho ,&nbsp;Peter A. Eyong ,&nbsp;Kebede Deribe ,&nbsp;Ntonifor Helen Ngum ,&nbsp;Allison Golden ,&nbsp;Samuel Wanji","doi":"10.1016/j.parepi.2023.e00290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The diagnosis of onchocerciasis in endemic areas has been demanding given the need to replace the invasive skin snip method with a more sensitive and specific rapid point-of-contact tool. Filarial antigen detection tests are better alternative methods in diagnosing <em>Onchocercal</em> infections, as they detect infections and could be used to monitor transmission in endemic areas following mass drug administration. With the shift in paradigme from control to elimination, a rapid point- of-contact tool is required to support elimination programs. This was a cross-sectional, community-based study conducted in 50 villages selected from six health districts using a systematic sampling technique. Individuals ≥17 years who had lived in the community for a duration of 5 years and above provided blood specimens for IgG4 antibodies testing against <em>O. volvulus</em> antigens. Data were analyzed using SPSS v.20 and expectation maximization to classify optical densities for positive and negative samples from ELISA results. The kappa statistics was used to measure the level of agreement between the two tests. In a total of 5001 participants which were recruited for the study, 4416 (88.3%) participant samples passed the plate quality control criteria and were considered for the test comparison analysis. Out of the 4416 participants, 292 (6.6%) tested positive with Ov16 RDT and 310 (7.0%) with Ov16 ELISA. All those who tested positive with the rapid test agreed positive with ELISA. The overall percentage agreement was 99.2%, the Kappa score of 0.936. The results obtained indicate an excellent agreement between ELISA and RDT as measured by kappa (0.936) which was statistically significant <strong>(<em>P</em></strong> <strong>&lt;</strong> <strong>0.001)</strong>. Our experience with the Ov16 ELISA biplex rapid test was favorable. However, the Ov16 RDT test may be more appropriate to use in remote areas for the point diagnosis of onchocerciasis in view towards achieving elimination in Africa.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37873,"journal":{"name":"Parasite Epidemiology and Control","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/85/0f/main.PMC7614264.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Concordance between Ov16 rapid diagnostic test(RDT) and Ov16 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the diagnosis of onchocerciasis in areas of contrasting endemicity in cameroon\",\"authors\":\"Relindis Ekanya ,&nbsp;Amuam Andrew Beng ,&nbsp;Muwah Anastacia Anim ,&nbsp;Yokyu Zachary Pangwoh ,&nbsp;Obie Elisabeth Dibando ,&nbsp;Narcisse Victor Tchamatchoua Gandjui ,&nbsp;Abong Raphael Awah ,&nbsp;Glory N. Amambo ,&nbsp;Gordon Takop Nchanji ,&nbsp;Bertrand Lontum Ndzeshang ,&nbsp;Theobald Mue Nji ,&nbsp;Fanny Fri Fombad ,&nbsp;Abdel Jelil Njouendou ,&nbsp;Esum Mathias Eyong ,&nbsp;Jerome Fru Cho ,&nbsp;Peter A. Eyong ,&nbsp;Kebede Deribe ,&nbsp;Ntonifor Helen Ngum ,&nbsp;Allison Golden ,&nbsp;Samuel Wanji\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.parepi.2023.e00290\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The diagnosis of onchocerciasis in endemic areas has been demanding given the need to replace the invasive skin snip method with a more sensitive and specific rapid point-of-contact tool. Filarial antigen detection tests are better alternative methods in diagnosing <em>Onchocercal</em> infections, as they detect infections and could be used to monitor transmission in endemic areas following mass drug administration. With the shift in paradigme from control to elimination, a rapid point- of-contact tool is required to support elimination programs. This was a cross-sectional, community-based study conducted in 50 villages selected from six health districts using a systematic sampling technique. Individuals ≥17 years who had lived in the community for a duration of 5 years and above provided blood specimens for IgG4 antibodies testing against <em>O. volvulus</em> antigens. Data were analyzed using SPSS v.20 and expectation maximization to classify optical densities for positive and negative samples from ELISA results. The kappa statistics was used to measure the level of agreement between the two tests. In a total of 5001 participants which were recruited for the study, 4416 (88.3%) participant samples passed the plate quality control criteria and were considered for the test comparison analysis. Out of the 4416 participants, 292 (6.6%) tested positive with Ov16 RDT and 310 (7.0%) with Ov16 ELISA. All those who tested positive with the rapid test agreed positive with ELISA. The overall percentage agreement was 99.2%, the Kappa score of 0.936. The results obtained indicate an excellent agreement between ELISA and RDT as measured by kappa (0.936) which was statistically significant <strong>(<em>P</em></strong> <strong>&lt;</strong> <strong>0.001)</strong>. Our experience with the Ov16 ELISA biplex rapid test was favorable. However, the Ov16 RDT test may be more appropriate to use in remote areas for the point diagnosis of onchocerciasis in view towards achieving elimination in Africa.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37873,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Parasite Epidemiology and Control\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/85/0f/main.PMC7614264.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Parasite Epidemiology and Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405673123000077\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parasite Epidemiology and Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405673123000077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

鉴于需要用更灵敏、更特异的快速接触点工具取代侵入性皮肤狙击法,对流行地区盘尾丝虫病的诊断提出了更高的要求。Filarial抗原检测测试是诊断Onchorcal感染的更好的替代方法,因为它们可以检测感染,并可用于监测大规模给药后流行地区的传播。随着范式从控制向消除的转变,需要一种快速的接触点工具来支持消除程序。这是一项基于社区的横断面研究,采用系统抽样技术,从六个卫生区中选出50个村庄。在社区生活5年及以上的≥17岁的个体提供了针对旋毛虫抗原的IgG4抗体测试的血液样本。使用SPSS v.20和期望最大化对数据进行分析,以根据ELISA结果对阳性和阴性样本的光密度进行分类。kappa统计用于测量两个测试之间的一致性水平。在该研究招募的5001名参与者中,4416名(88.3%)参与者样本通过了平板质量控制标准,并被考虑进行测试比较分析。在4416名参与者中,292人(6.6%)的Ov16RDT检测呈阳性,310人(7.0%)的OV16ELISA检测呈阳性。所有快速检测呈阳性的人都同意ELISA呈阳性。总体百分比一致性为99.2%,Kappa评分为0.936。所获得的结果表明,通过kappa(0.936)测量的ELISA和RDT之间具有极好的一致性,具有统计学意义(P<;0.001)。我们对Ov16-ELISA双联快速测试的经验是有利的。然而,Ov16-RDT测试可能更适合在偏远地区用于盘尾丝虫病的点诊断,以期在非洲实现消除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Concordance between Ov16 rapid diagnostic test(RDT) and Ov16 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the diagnosis of onchocerciasis in areas of contrasting endemicity in cameroon

Concordance between Ov16 rapid diagnostic test(RDT) and Ov16 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the diagnosis of onchocerciasis in areas of contrasting endemicity in cameroon

Concordance between Ov16 rapid diagnostic test(RDT) and Ov16 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the diagnosis of onchocerciasis in areas of contrasting endemicity in cameroon

Concordance between Ov16 rapid diagnostic test(RDT) and Ov16 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the diagnosis of onchocerciasis in areas of contrasting endemicity in cameroon

The diagnosis of onchocerciasis in endemic areas has been demanding given the need to replace the invasive skin snip method with a more sensitive and specific rapid point-of-contact tool. Filarial antigen detection tests are better alternative methods in diagnosing Onchocercal infections, as they detect infections and could be used to monitor transmission in endemic areas following mass drug administration. With the shift in paradigme from control to elimination, a rapid point- of-contact tool is required to support elimination programs. This was a cross-sectional, community-based study conducted in 50 villages selected from six health districts using a systematic sampling technique. Individuals ≥17 years who had lived in the community for a duration of 5 years and above provided blood specimens for IgG4 antibodies testing against O. volvulus antigens. Data were analyzed using SPSS v.20 and expectation maximization to classify optical densities for positive and negative samples from ELISA results. The kappa statistics was used to measure the level of agreement between the two tests. In a total of 5001 participants which were recruited for the study, 4416 (88.3%) participant samples passed the plate quality control criteria and were considered for the test comparison analysis. Out of the 4416 participants, 292 (6.6%) tested positive with Ov16 RDT and 310 (7.0%) with Ov16 ELISA. All those who tested positive with the rapid test agreed positive with ELISA. The overall percentage agreement was 99.2%, the Kappa score of 0.936. The results obtained indicate an excellent agreement between ELISA and RDT as measured by kappa (0.936) which was statistically significant (P < 0.001). Our experience with the Ov16 ELISA biplex rapid test was favorable. However, the Ov16 RDT test may be more appropriate to use in remote areas for the point diagnosis of onchocerciasis in view towards achieving elimination in Africa.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Parasite Epidemiology and Control
Parasite Epidemiology and Control Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
44
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Parasite Epidemiology and Control is an Open Access journal. There is an increasing amount of research in the parasitology area that analyses the patterns, causes, and effects of health and disease conditions in defined populations. This epidemiology of parasite infectious diseases is predominantly studied in human populations but also spans other major hosts of parasitic infections and as such this journal will have a broad remit. We will focus on the major areas of epidemiological study including disease etiology, disease surveillance, drug resistance and geographical spread and screening, biomonitoring, and comparisons of treatment effects in clinical trials for both human and other animals. We will also look at the epidemiology and control of vector insects. The journal will also cover the use of geographic information systems (Epi-GIS) for epidemiological surveillance which is a rapidly growing area of research in infectious diseases. Molecular epidemiological approaches are also particularly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信