学习障碍学生关键过渡要素的证据回顾

IF 0.5 Q4 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
K. A. Lowrey, Leonard C. W. Troughton, Ryan Nation, Samantha Papp, L. Williams
{"title":"学习障碍学生关键过渡要素的证据回顾","authors":"K. A. Lowrey, Leonard C. W. Troughton, Ryan Nation, Samantha Papp, L. Williams","doi":"10.18666/ldmj-2023-v28-i1-11270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this analysis was to systematically review research specific to the transition of students with Specific Learning Disabilities (SLD) and report identified key components of that process along with identifiable gaps to offer information useful for practitioners, families, and others that may be supporting students with SLD during transition. Researchers reviewed thirty years of research since the 1990 addition of transition to IDEA. Fifty-four articles met established inclusion/exclusion criteria specific to students with SLD in the United States. Articles included qualitative and quantitative studies, literature reviews, policy papers, and conceptual frameworks describing effective transition practices and services. Five themes from the literature were identified. Utilizing a historical frame, researchers analyzed the five key themes identified in the context of previously identified key components for transition planning. Recommendations and implications are suggested for future research.","PeriodicalId":42442,"journal":{"name":"Learning Disabilities-A Multidisciplinary Journal","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Evidence Review of Key Transition Components for Students with Learning Disabilities\",\"authors\":\"K. A. Lowrey, Leonard C. W. Troughton, Ryan Nation, Samantha Papp, L. Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.18666/ldmj-2023-v28-i1-11270\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this analysis was to systematically review research specific to the transition of students with Specific Learning Disabilities (SLD) and report identified key components of that process along with identifiable gaps to offer information useful for practitioners, families, and others that may be supporting students with SLD during transition. Researchers reviewed thirty years of research since the 1990 addition of transition to IDEA. Fifty-four articles met established inclusion/exclusion criteria specific to students with SLD in the United States. Articles included qualitative and quantitative studies, literature reviews, policy papers, and conceptual frameworks describing effective transition practices and services. Five themes from the literature were identified. Utilizing a historical frame, researchers analyzed the five key themes identified in the context of previously identified key components for transition planning. Recommendations and implications are suggested for future research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42442,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning Disabilities-A Multidisciplinary Journal\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning Disabilities-A Multidisciplinary Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18666/ldmj-2023-v28-i1-11270\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning Disabilities-A Multidisciplinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18666/ldmj-2023-v28-i1-11270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本分析的目的是系统地回顾有关特殊学习障碍学生(SLD)过渡的研究,并报告该过程的关键组成部分以及可识别的差距,为从业者、家庭和其他可能在过渡期间支持特殊学习障碍学生的人提供有用的信息。研究人员回顾了自1990年向IDEA添加过渡以来的30年研究。54篇文章符合美国特定于SLD学生的既定纳入/排除标准。文章包括定性和定量研究、文献综述、政策文件以及描述有效过渡实践和服务的概念框架。从文献中确定了五个主题。利用历史框架,研究人员分析了在先前确定的过渡计划关键组成部分的背景下确定的五个关键主题。对今后的研究提出了建议和启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Evidence Review of Key Transition Components for Students with Learning Disabilities
The purpose of this analysis was to systematically review research specific to the transition of students with Specific Learning Disabilities (SLD) and report identified key components of that process along with identifiable gaps to offer information useful for practitioners, families, and others that may be supporting students with SLD during transition. Researchers reviewed thirty years of research since the 1990 addition of transition to IDEA. Fifty-four articles met established inclusion/exclusion criteria specific to students with SLD in the United States. Articles included qualitative and quantitative studies, literature reviews, policy papers, and conceptual frameworks describing effective transition practices and services. Five themes from the literature were identified. Utilizing a historical frame, researchers analyzed the five key themes identified in the context of previously identified key components for transition planning. Recommendations and implications are suggested for future research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
6.20%
发文量
4
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信