安大略省青年及其家庭获得精神健康和戒毒服务的机会:父母、青年和服务提供者的观点。

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Toula Kourgiantakis, Roula Markoulakis, Eunjung Lee, Amina Hussain, Carrie Lau, Rachelle Ashcroft, Abby L Goldstein, Sugy Kodeeswaran, Charmaine C Williams, Anthony Levitt
{"title":"安大略省青年及其家庭获得精神健康和戒毒服务的机会:父母、青年和服务提供者的观点。","authors":"Toula Kourgiantakis,&nbsp;Roula Markoulakis,&nbsp;Eunjung Lee,&nbsp;Amina Hussain,&nbsp;Carrie Lau,&nbsp;Rachelle Ashcroft,&nbsp;Abby L Goldstein,&nbsp;Sugy Kodeeswaran,&nbsp;Charmaine C Williams,&nbsp;Anthony Levitt","doi":"10.1186/s13033-023-00572-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Canadian youth (aged 16-24) have the highest rates of mental health and addiction concerns across all age groups and the most unmet health care needs. There are many structural barriers that contribute to the unmet mental health care needs of youth including lack of available and appropriate services, high costs, long wait times, fragmented and siloed services, lack of smooth transition between child and adult services, stigma, racism, and discrimination, as well as lack of culturally appropriate treatments. Levesque et al. (2013) developed a framework to better understand health care access and this framework conceptualizes accessibility across five dimensions: (1) approachability, (2) availability, (3) affordability, (4) appropriateness, and (5) acceptability. The purpose of this study was to explore access to addiction and mental health services for youth in Ontario, Canada from the perspectives of youth, parents, and service providers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study was a university-community partnership exploring the experiences of youth with mental health concerns and their families from the perspectives of youth, caregivers, and service providers. We conducted semi-structured interviews and used thematic analysis to analyze data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study involved 25 participants (n = 11 parents, n = 4 youth, n = 10 service providers). We identified six themes related to structural barriers impacting access to youth mental health and services: (1) \"The biggest barrier in accessing mental health support is where to look,\" (2) \"There's always going to be a waitlist,\" (3) \"I have to have money to be healthy,\" (4) \"They weren't really listening to my issues,\" (5) \"Having more of a welcoming and inclusive system,\" and (6) \"Health laws aren't doing what they need to do.\"</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study identified five structural barriers that map onto the Levesque et al. healthcare access conceptual framework and a sixth structural barrier that is not adequately captured by this model which focuses on policies, procedures, and laws. The findings have implications for policies and service provisions, and underline the urgent need for a mental health strategy that will increase access to care, improve mental health in youth, decrease burden on parents, and reduce inequities in mental health policies and services.</p>","PeriodicalId":47752,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mental Health Systems","volume":"17 1","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10011786/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Access to mental health and addiction services for youth and their families in Ontario: perspectives of parents, youth, and service providers.\",\"authors\":\"Toula Kourgiantakis,&nbsp;Roula Markoulakis,&nbsp;Eunjung Lee,&nbsp;Amina Hussain,&nbsp;Carrie Lau,&nbsp;Rachelle Ashcroft,&nbsp;Abby L Goldstein,&nbsp;Sugy Kodeeswaran,&nbsp;Charmaine C Williams,&nbsp;Anthony Levitt\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13033-023-00572-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Canadian youth (aged 16-24) have the highest rates of mental health and addiction concerns across all age groups and the most unmet health care needs. There are many structural barriers that contribute to the unmet mental health care needs of youth including lack of available and appropriate services, high costs, long wait times, fragmented and siloed services, lack of smooth transition between child and adult services, stigma, racism, and discrimination, as well as lack of culturally appropriate treatments. Levesque et al. (2013) developed a framework to better understand health care access and this framework conceptualizes accessibility across five dimensions: (1) approachability, (2) availability, (3) affordability, (4) appropriateness, and (5) acceptability. The purpose of this study was to explore access to addiction and mental health services for youth in Ontario, Canada from the perspectives of youth, parents, and service providers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study was a university-community partnership exploring the experiences of youth with mental health concerns and their families from the perspectives of youth, caregivers, and service providers. We conducted semi-structured interviews and used thematic analysis to analyze data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study involved 25 participants (n = 11 parents, n = 4 youth, n = 10 service providers). We identified six themes related to structural barriers impacting access to youth mental health and services: (1) \\\"The biggest barrier in accessing mental health support is where to look,\\\" (2) \\\"There's always going to be a waitlist,\\\" (3) \\\"I have to have money to be healthy,\\\" (4) \\\"They weren't really listening to my issues,\\\" (5) \\\"Having more of a welcoming and inclusive system,\\\" and (6) \\\"Health laws aren't doing what they need to do.\\\"</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study identified five structural barriers that map onto the Levesque et al. healthcare access conceptual framework and a sixth structural barrier that is not adequately captured by this model which focuses on policies, procedures, and laws. The findings have implications for policies and service provisions, and underline the urgent need for a mental health strategy that will increase access to care, improve mental health in youth, decrease burden on parents, and reduce inequities in mental health policies and services.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Mental Health Systems\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10011786/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Mental Health Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-023-00572-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mental Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-023-00572-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:加拿大青年(16-24岁)在所有年龄组中心理健康和成瘾问题的发生率最高,并且未满足的医疗保健需求最多。造成青年精神保健需求得不到满足的结构性障碍有很多,包括缺乏可用和适当的服务、费用高、等待时间长、服务分散和孤立、儿童和成人服务之间缺乏顺利过渡、污名化、种族主义和歧视,以及缺乏文化上适当的治疗。Levesque等人(2013)开发了一个框架来更好地理解医疗保健可及性,该框架从五个方面对可及性进行了概念化:(1)可接近性,(2)可获得性,(3)可负担性,(4)适当性和(5)可接受性。本研究的目的是从青少年、父母和服务提供者的角度探讨加拿大安大略省青少年获得成瘾和心理健康服务的途径。方法:本研究采用大学与社区合作的方法,从青少年、照顾者和服务提供者的角度,探讨有心理健康问题的青少年及其家庭的经历。我们进行了半结构化访谈,并使用主题分析来分析数据。结果:本研究共涉及25名参与者(n = 11名家长,n = 4名青少年,n = 10名服务提供者)。我们确定了与影响获得青年心理健康和服务的结构性障碍有关的六个主题:(1)“获得心理健康支持的最大障碍是去哪里找,”(2)“总是会有很多人在等待。”“我必须有钱才能保持健康。”“他们并没有真正倾听我的问题。”“建立一个更加欢迎和包容的体系,”以及(6)“卫生法没有发挥其应有的作用。”结论:我们的研究确定了五个结构性障碍,这些障碍映射到Levesque等人的医疗保健准入概念框架和第六个结构性障碍,该模型没有充分捕获,重点是政策,程序和法律。研究结果对政策和服务提供具有影响,并强调迫切需要制定一项精神卫生战略,以增加获得护理的机会,改善青年的精神卫生,减轻父母的负担,并减少精神卫生政策和服务中的不公平现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Access to mental health and addiction services for youth and their families in Ontario: perspectives of parents, youth, and service providers.

Background: Canadian youth (aged 16-24) have the highest rates of mental health and addiction concerns across all age groups and the most unmet health care needs. There are many structural barriers that contribute to the unmet mental health care needs of youth including lack of available and appropriate services, high costs, long wait times, fragmented and siloed services, lack of smooth transition between child and adult services, stigma, racism, and discrimination, as well as lack of culturally appropriate treatments. Levesque et al. (2013) developed a framework to better understand health care access and this framework conceptualizes accessibility across five dimensions: (1) approachability, (2) availability, (3) affordability, (4) appropriateness, and (5) acceptability. The purpose of this study was to explore access to addiction and mental health services for youth in Ontario, Canada from the perspectives of youth, parents, and service providers.

Methods: This qualitative study was a university-community partnership exploring the experiences of youth with mental health concerns and their families from the perspectives of youth, caregivers, and service providers. We conducted semi-structured interviews and used thematic analysis to analyze data.

Results: The study involved 25 participants (n = 11 parents, n = 4 youth, n = 10 service providers). We identified six themes related to structural barriers impacting access to youth mental health and services: (1) "The biggest barrier in accessing mental health support is where to look," (2) "There's always going to be a waitlist," (3) "I have to have money to be healthy," (4) "They weren't really listening to my issues," (5) "Having more of a welcoming and inclusive system," and (6) "Health laws aren't doing what they need to do."

Conclusion: Our study identified five structural barriers that map onto the Levesque et al. healthcare access conceptual framework and a sixth structural barrier that is not adequately captured by this model which focuses on policies, procedures, and laws. The findings have implications for policies and service provisions, and underline the urgent need for a mental health strategy that will increase access to care, improve mental health in youth, decrease burden on parents, and reduce inequities in mental health policies and services.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
52
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信