日本和韩国信息组织研究的最新趋势

4区 管理学
Jane Cho
{"title":"日本和韩国信息组织研究的最新趋势","authors":"Jane Cho","doi":"10.1080/14649055.2013.10766354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In order to analyze and compare the intellectual structure of information organization research in Japan and Korea, this study has carried out frequency analysis and network text analysis of research articles published in the last two years. Analysis showed that the Japanese information organization area has a high frequency of research centered on the concepts of “catalog” and “classification”. In particular, “catalog” is seen to have a high figure in degree centrality by network text analysis, it can be said that the “catalog” concept has extensive connections with a diverse range of subjects in the area of information organization. On the other hand, the Korean information organization research area showed a high frequency and connectivity of subjects related to “classification” rather than “catalog”. The “classification” concept is seen to have extensive connections with other various subjects in the Korean information organization research area.","PeriodicalId":43196,"journal":{"name":"LIBRARY COLLECTIONS ACQUISITIONS & TECHNICAL SERVICES","volume":"20 1","pages":"107 - 117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The recent trends of information organization research in Japan and Korea\",\"authors\":\"Jane Cho\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14649055.2013.10766354\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In order to analyze and compare the intellectual structure of information organization research in Japan and Korea, this study has carried out frequency analysis and network text analysis of research articles published in the last two years. Analysis showed that the Japanese information organization area has a high frequency of research centered on the concepts of “catalog” and “classification”. In particular, “catalog” is seen to have a high figure in degree centrality by network text analysis, it can be said that the “catalog” concept has extensive connections with a diverse range of subjects in the area of information organization. On the other hand, the Korean information organization research area showed a high frequency and connectivity of subjects related to “classification” rather than “catalog”. The “classification” concept is seen to have extensive connections with other various subjects in the Korean information organization research area.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43196,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LIBRARY COLLECTIONS ACQUISITIONS & TECHNICAL SERVICES\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"107 - 117\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LIBRARY COLLECTIONS ACQUISITIONS & TECHNICAL SERVICES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14649055.2013.10766354\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LIBRARY COLLECTIONS ACQUISITIONS & TECHNICAL SERVICES","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14649055.2013.10766354","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要为了对日韩两国信息组织研究的智力结构进行分析和比较,本研究对近两年发表的研究论文进行了频次分析和网络文本分析。分析表明,日本信息组织领域以“目录”和“分类”概念为中心的研究频率较高。特别是“目录”在网络文本分析中具有很高的度中心性,可以说“目录”概念与信息组织领域的各种学科有着广泛的联系。另一方面,韩国信息组织研究领域与“分类”相关的主题比“目录”相关的主题频率高,连通性也高。“分类”概念被认为与韩国信息组织研究领域的其他学科有着广泛的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The recent trends of information organization research in Japan and Korea
Abstract In order to analyze and compare the intellectual structure of information organization research in Japan and Korea, this study has carried out frequency analysis and network text analysis of research articles published in the last two years. Analysis showed that the Japanese information organization area has a high frequency of research centered on the concepts of “catalog” and “classification”. In particular, “catalog” is seen to have a high figure in degree centrality by network text analysis, it can be said that the “catalog” concept has extensive connections with a diverse range of subjects in the area of information organization. On the other hand, the Korean information organization research area showed a high frequency and connectivity of subjects related to “classification” rather than “catalog”. The “classification” concept is seen to have extensive connections with other various subjects in the Korean information organization research area.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
LIBRARY COLLECTIONS ACQUISITIONS & TECHNICAL SERVICES
LIBRARY COLLECTIONS ACQUISITIONS & TECHNICAL SERVICES INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services provides a forum for the international exchange of ideas and experiences among members of the library collection management, technical services, vendor and publishing communities throughout the world. It is a comprehensive publication designed to bring together many of the specializations within the broad areas of library collection management and technical services including, but by no means limited to, acquisition of books and serials in academic, public, school and special libraries; cataloging and authority control.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信