支气管肺泡灌洗:我们是否遵循ATS的指导?

Ivor Allon, S. Joseph, R. Mogal, R. Vancheeswaran
{"title":"支气管肺泡灌洗:我们是否遵循ATS的指导?","authors":"Ivor Allon, S. Joseph, R. Mogal, R. Vancheeswaran","doi":"10.1183/13993003.congress-2020.2837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is performed for diagnostic and management purposes in interstitial lung disease. ATS produced the only official guidance on using BAL as such, which was incorporated at our trust in 2019. Aims: We aimed to identify if guidelines were being met focussing on CT indication and sampling of the distal airways. This was to include the volume instilled and pooled as well as cytology confirming bronchial epithelial cell count Methods: We retrospectively analysed each BAL performed from 14/01/19-2/10/19 where samples were sent to cytology (n=92). Using procedure records, the documented instilled and pooled volumes were analysed, while cytology results were also evaluated. 39 of the procedures had their imaging and serology analysed to confirm BAL indication. Results: Of the 39 reviewed, 15(38.5%) had CT +/- serology indication, with 24(61.5%) lacking indication. These typically had infective or clear IPF pictures. 20(21.7%) BALs were taken from upper lobes, of which 10(55.6%) of those with details yielded ≥30% of the instilled volume. From lower and middle lobes (35(38%) each), 16(61.5%) and 25(83.3%) yielded ≥30% respectively. All cytology samples contained ≥5ml pooled saline, with 85(92.4%) containing ≥10ml. Two samples were excluded. Of the remaining 90, 61(67.8%) had a bronchial epithelial cell count ≤5% with 29(32.2%) >5%. Conclusions: There is clear room for improvement by reducing unnecessary BALs (61.5%), although more analysis is required, and increasing the pooled volume to >30% of that instilled (only 68.4%). While appropriate sample volumes are being sent to cytology, nearly a third (32.2%) were of no diagnostic benefit. We shall introduce methods for improvement and re-audit htis data.","PeriodicalId":93455,"journal":{"name":"Interventional pulmonology (Middletown, Del.)","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bronchoalveolar lavage: are we following ATS guidance?\",\"authors\":\"Ivor Allon, S. Joseph, R. Mogal, R. Vancheeswaran\",\"doi\":\"10.1183/13993003.congress-2020.2837\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is performed for diagnostic and management purposes in interstitial lung disease. ATS produced the only official guidance on using BAL as such, which was incorporated at our trust in 2019. Aims: We aimed to identify if guidelines were being met focussing on CT indication and sampling of the distal airways. This was to include the volume instilled and pooled as well as cytology confirming bronchial epithelial cell count Methods: We retrospectively analysed each BAL performed from 14/01/19-2/10/19 where samples were sent to cytology (n=92). Using procedure records, the documented instilled and pooled volumes were analysed, while cytology results were also evaluated. 39 of the procedures had their imaging and serology analysed to confirm BAL indication. Results: Of the 39 reviewed, 15(38.5%) had CT +/- serology indication, with 24(61.5%) lacking indication. These typically had infective or clear IPF pictures. 20(21.7%) BALs were taken from upper lobes, of which 10(55.6%) of those with details yielded ≥30% of the instilled volume. From lower and middle lobes (35(38%) each), 16(61.5%) and 25(83.3%) yielded ≥30% respectively. All cytology samples contained ≥5ml pooled saline, with 85(92.4%) containing ≥10ml. Two samples were excluded. Of the remaining 90, 61(67.8%) had a bronchial epithelial cell count ≤5% with 29(32.2%) >5%. Conclusions: There is clear room for improvement by reducing unnecessary BALs (61.5%), although more analysis is required, and increasing the pooled volume to >30% of that instilled (only 68.4%). While appropriate sample volumes are being sent to cytology, nearly a third (32.2%) were of no diagnostic benefit. We shall introduce methods for improvement and re-audit htis data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93455,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interventional pulmonology (Middletown, Del.)\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interventional pulmonology (Middletown, Del.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2020.2837\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional pulmonology (Middletown, Del.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2020.2837","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)用于诊断和治疗间质性肺疾病。ATS制定了关于使用BAL的唯一官方指南,该指南于2019年在我们的信托基金注册。目的:我们旨在确定指南是否得到满足,重点关注CT指征和远端气道采样。方法:我们回顾性分析了19年1月14日至19年2月10日期间进行的每次BAL检查,其中样本被送往细胞学检查(n=92)。使用程序记录,对记录的灌注和汇集的体积进行分析,同时对细胞学结果进行评估。39例手术进行了影像学和血清学分析以确认BAL适应证。结果:39例患者中,15例(38.5%)有CT +/-血清学指征,24例(61.5%)无指征。这些通常具有感染性或清晰的IPF图像。上叶20例(21.7%),其中有细节的10例(55.6%)的灌注体积≥30%。下叶和中叶分别有35个(38%)、16个(61.5%)和25个(83.3%)的产率≥30%。所有细胞学样本均含有≥5ml的池生理盐水,其中85个(92.4%)样本含有≥10ml。两个样本被排除。其余90例中,61例(67.8%)支气管上皮细胞计数≤5%,29例(32.2%)支气管上皮细胞计数≤5%。结论:尽管需要更多的分析,但通过减少不必要的bal(61.5%),并将汇集量增加到灌注量的30%(仅为68.4%),有明显的改进空间。虽然适当的样本量被送到细胞学检查,但近三分之一(32.2%)没有诊断价值。我们将引入改进和重新审核这些数据的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bronchoalveolar lavage: are we following ATS guidance?
Introduction: Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is performed for diagnostic and management purposes in interstitial lung disease. ATS produced the only official guidance on using BAL as such, which was incorporated at our trust in 2019. Aims: We aimed to identify if guidelines were being met focussing on CT indication and sampling of the distal airways. This was to include the volume instilled and pooled as well as cytology confirming bronchial epithelial cell count Methods: We retrospectively analysed each BAL performed from 14/01/19-2/10/19 where samples were sent to cytology (n=92). Using procedure records, the documented instilled and pooled volumes were analysed, while cytology results were also evaluated. 39 of the procedures had their imaging and serology analysed to confirm BAL indication. Results: Of the 39 reviewed, 15(38.5%) had CT +/- serology indication, with 24(61.5%) lacking indication. These typically had infective or clear IPF pictures. 20(21.7%) BALs were taken from upper lobes, of which 10(55.6%) of those with details yielded ≥30% of the instilled volume. From lower and middle lobes (35(38%) each), 16(61.5%) and 25(83.3%) yielded ≥30% respectively. All cytology samples contained ≥5ml pooled saline, with 85(92.4%) containing ≥10ml. Two samples were excluded. Of the remaining 90, 61(67.8%) had a bronchial epithelial cell count ≤5% with 29(32.2%) >5%. Conclusions: There is clear room for improvement by reducing unnecessary BALs (61.5%), although more analysis is required, and increasing the pooled volume to >30% of that instilled (only 68.4%). While appropriate sample volumes are being sent to cytology, nearly a third (32.2%) were of no diagnostic benefit. We shall introduce methods for improvement and re-audit htis data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信