{"title":"中国医疗器械临床评价监管指导的演变及其对上市前和批准后临床评价策略的启示","authors":"Gui Su, Dongyuan Deng","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2023.2184258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The rapid growth of the medical device industry has driven the evolution of regulatory guidance on medical device clinical evaluation (MDCE) of the China National Medical Products Administration (NMPA), which consequently influences pre-market and post-approval clinical evaluation (CE) strategies.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>We aimed to investigate the 3-stage evolution of NMPA regulatory guidance on MDCE (1. The era before specific CE guidance, 2. 2015 CE Guidance, and 3. 2021 CE Guidance Series), analyze the gaps between each stage, and assess the evolution's impact on pre-market and post-approval CE strategies.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The fundamental principles of the NMPA 2021 CE Guidance Series were transformed from the 2019 International Medical Device Regulatory Forum documents. Compared with the 2015 guidance, the 2021 CE Guidance Series further clarifies the CE definition by emphasizing the ongoing activity of CE through an entire product lifecycle and the use of scientifically sound methods for CE and narrows the pre-market CE pathways into the equivalent device and clinical trial pathways. The 2021 CE Guidance Series simplifies the process for selecting the pre-market CE strategy but does not specify post-approval CE update cadency and general requirements for post-market clinical follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":12330,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Medical Devices","volume":"20 3","pages":"167-178"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evolution of China regulatory guidance on the clinical evaluation of medical devices and its implication on pre-market and post-approval clinical evaluation strategies.\",\"authors\":\"Gui Su, Dongyuan Deng\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17434440.2023.2184258\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The rapid growth of the medical device industry has driven the evolution of regulatory guidance on medical device clinical evaluation (MDCE) of the China National Medical Products Administration (NMPA), which consequently influences pre-market and post-approval clinical evaluation (CE) strategies.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>We aimed to investigate the 3-stage evolution of NMPA regulatory guidance on MDCE (1. The era before specific CE guidance, 2. 2015 CE Guidance, and 3. 2021 CE Guidance Series), analyze the gaps between each stage, and assess the evolution's impact on pre-market and post-approval CE strategies.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The fundamental principles of the NMPA 2021 CE Guidance Series were transformed from the 2019 International Medical Device Regulatory Forum documents. Compared with the 2015 guidance, the 2021 CE Guidance Series further clarifies the CE definition by emphasizing the ongoing activity of CE through an entire product lifecycle and the use of scientifically sound methods for CE and narrows the pre-market CE pathways into the equivalent device and clinical trial pathways. The 2021 CE Guidance Series simplifies the process for selecting the pre-market CE strategy but does not specify post-approval CE update cadency and general requirements for post-market clinical follow-up.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Medical Devices\",\"volume\":\"20 3\",\"pages\":\"167-178\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Medical Devices\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2023.2184258\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Medical Devices","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2023.2184258","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evolution of China regulatory guidance on the clinical evaluation of medical devices and its implication on pre-market and post-approval clinical evaluation strategies.
Introduction: The rapid growth of the medical device industry has driven the evolution of regulatory guidance on medical device clinical evaluation (MDCE) of the China National Medical Products Administration (NMPA), which consequently influences pre-market and post-approval clinical evaluation (CE) strategies.
Areas covered: We aimed to investigate the 3-stage evolution of NMPA regulatory guidance on MDCE (1. The era before specific CE guidance, 2. 2015 CE Guidance, and 3. 2021 CE Guidance Series), analyze the gaps between each stage, and assess the evolution's impact on pre-market and post-approval CE strategies.
Expert opinion: The fundamental principles of the NMPA 2021 CE Guidance Series were transformed from the 2019 International Medical Device Regulatory Forum documents. Compared with the 2015 guidance, the 2021 CE Guidance Series further clarifies the CE definition by emphasizing the ongoing activity of CE through an entire product lifecycle and the use of scientifically sound methods for CE and narrows the pre-market CE pathways into the equivalent device and clinical trial pathways. The 2021 CE Guidance Series simplifies the process for selecting the pre-market CE strategy but does not specify post-approval CE update cadency and general requirements for post-market clinical follow-up.
期刊介绍:
The journal serves the device research community by providing a comprehensive body of high-quality information from leading experts, all subject to rigorous peer review. The Expert Review format is specially structured to optimize the value of the information to reader. Comprehensive coverage by each author in a key area of research or clinical practice is augmented by the following sections:
Expert commentary - a personal view on the most effective or promising strategies
Five-year view - a clear perspective of future prospects within a realistic timescale
Key issues - an executive summary cutting to the author''s most critical points
In addition to the Review program, each issue also features Medical Device Profiles - objective assessments of specific devices in development or clinical use to help inform clinical practice. There are also Perspectives - overviews highlighting areas of current debate and controversy, together with reports from the conference scene and invited Editorials.