跨领域的人类元认知:来自个体差异和神经影像学的见解。

Q3 Medicine
Marion Rouault, Andrew McWilliams, Micah G Allen, Stephen M Fleming
{"title":"跨领域的人类元认知:来自个体差异和神经影像学的见解。","authors":"Marion Rouault,&nbsp;Andrew McWilliams,&nbsp;Micah G Allen,&nbsp;Stephen M Fleming","doi":"10.1017/pen.2018.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Metacognition is the capacity to evaluate and control one's own cognitive processes. Metacognition operates over a range of cognitive domains, such as perception and memory, but the neurocognitive architecture supporting this ability remains controversial. Is metacognition enabled by a common, domain-general resource that is recruited to evaluate performance on a variety of tasks? Or is metacognition reliant on domain-specific modules? This article reviews recent literature on the domain-generality of human metacognition, drawing on evidence from individual differences and neuroimaging. A meta-analysis of behavioral studies found that perceptual metacognitive ability was correlated across different sensory modalities, but found no correlation between metacognition of perception and memory. However, evidence for domain-generality from behavioral data may suffer from a lack of power to identify correlations across model parameters indexing metacognitive efficiency. Neuroimaging data provide a complementary perspective on the domain-generality of metacognition, revealing co-existence of neural signatures that are common and distinct across tasks. We suggest that such an architecture may be appropriate for \"tagging\" generic feelings of confidence with domain-specific information, in turn forming the basis for priors about self-ability and modulation of higher-order behavioral control.</p>","PeriodicalId":36424,"journal":{"name":"Personality Neuroscience","volume":"1 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/pen.2018.16","citationCount":"108","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Human metacognition across domains: insights from individual differences and neuroimaging.\",\"authors\":\"Marion Rouault,&nbsp;Andrew McWilliams,&nbsp;Micah G Allen,&nbsp;Stephen M Fleming\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/pen.2018.16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Metacognition is the capacity to evaluate and control one's own cognitive processes. Metacognition operates over a range of cognitive domains, such as perception and memory, but the neurocognitive architecture supporting this ability remains controversial. Is metacognition enabled by a common, domain-general resource that is recruited to evaluate performance on a variety of tasks? Or is metacognition reliant on domain-specific modules? This article reviews recent literature on the domain-generality of human metacognition, drawing on evidence from individual differences and neuroimaging. A meta-analysis of behavioral studies found that perceptual metacognitive ability was correlated across different sensory modalities, but found no correlation between metacognition of perception and memory. However, evidence for domain-generality from behavioral data may suffer from a lack of power to identify correlations across model parameters indexing metacognitive efficiency. Neuroimaging data provide a complementary perspective on the domain-generality of metacognition, revealing co-existence of neural signatures that are common and distinct across tasks. We suggest that such an architecture may be appropriate for \\\"tagging\\\" generic feelings of confidence with domain-specific information, in turn forming the basis for priors about self-ability and modulation of higher-order behavioral control.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36424,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personality Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"1 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/pen.2018.16\",\"citationCount\":\"108\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personality Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/pen.2018.16\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/pen.2018.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 108

摘要

元认知是评价和控制自己认知过程的能力。元认知作用于一系列认知领域,如感知和记忆,但支持这种能力的神经认知结构仍然存在争议。元认知是否由一个公共的、领域通用的资源来支持,用来评估各种任务的性能?还是元认知依赖于特定领域的模块?本文从个体差异和神经影像学的证据出发,综述了近年来关于人类元认知领域概括性的文献。行为学研究的荟萃分析发现,知觉元认知能力在不同的感觉形态之间存在相关性,但知觉元认知能力与记忆元认知能力之间没有相关性。然而,来自行为数据的领域通用性证据可能会因缺乏识别模型参数之间的相关性而受到影响,索引元认知效率。神经影像学数据为元认知的领域概括性提供了一个互补的视角,揭示了在不同任务中共同和独特的神经特征共存。我们认为这样的架构可能适合于用特定领域的信息“标记”一般的自信感觉,进而形成关于自我能力和高阶行为控制调节的先验基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Human metacognition across domains: insights from individual differences and neuroimaging.

Human metacognition across domains: insights from individual differences and neuroimaging.

Human metacognition across domains: insights from individual differences and neuroimaging.

Human metacognition across domains: insights from individual differences and neuroimaging.

Metacognition is the capacity to evaluate and control one's own cognitive processes. Metacognition operates over a range of cognitive domains, such as perception and memory, but the neurocognitive architecture supporting this ability remains controversial. Is metacognition enabled by a common, domain-general resource that is recruited to evaluate performance on a variety of tasks? Or is metacognition reliant on domain-specific modules? This article reviews recent literature on the domain-generality of human metacognition, drawing on evidence from individual differences and neuroimaging. A meta-analysis of behavioral studies found that perceptual metacognitive ability was correlated across different sensory modalities, but found no correlation between metacognition of perception and memory. However, evidence for domain-generality from behavioral data may suffer from a lack of power to identify correlations across model parameters indexing metacognitive efficiency. Neuroimaging data provide a complementary perspective on the domain-generality of metacognition, revealing co-existence of neural signatures that are common and distinct across tasks. We suggest that such an architecture may be appropriate for "tagging" generic feelings of confidence with domain-specific information, in turn forming the basis for priors about self-ability and modulation of higher-order behavioral control.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Personality Neuroscience
Personality Neuroscience Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信