利用4d血流心脏磁共振成像定量心肌血流和阻力。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Rebecca C Gosling, Gareth Williams, Abdulaziz Al Baraikan, Samer Alabed, Eylem Levelt, Amrit Chowdhary, Peter P Swoboda, Ian Halliday, D Rodney Hose, Julian P Gunn, John P Greenwood, Sven Plein, Andrew J Swift, James M Wild, Pankaj Garg, Paul D Morris
{"title":"利用4d血流心脏磁共振成像定量心肌血流和阻力。","authors":"Rebecca C Gosling,&nbsp;Gareth Williams,&nbsp;Abdulaziz Al Baraikan,&nbsp;Samer Alabed,&nbsp;Eylem Levelt,&nbsp;Amrit Chowdhary,&nbsp;Peter P Swoboda,&nbsp;Ian Halliday,&nbsp;D Rodney Hose,&nbsp;Julian P Gunn,&nbsp;John P Greenwood,&nbsp;Sven Plein,&nbsp;Andrew J Swift,&nbsp;James M Wild,&nbsp;Pankaj Garg,&nbsp;Paul D Morris","doi":"10.1155/2023/3875924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ischaemia with nonobstructive coronary arteries is most commonly caused by coronary microvascular dysfunction but remains difficult to diagnose without invasive testing. Myocardial blood flow (MBF) can be quantified noninvasively on stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) or positron emission tomography but neither is routinely used in clinical practice due to practical and technical constraints. Quantification of coronary sinus (CS) flow may represent a simpler method for CMR MBF quantification. 4D flow CMR offers comprehensive intracardiac and transvalvular flow quantification. However, it is feasibility to quantify MBF remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) and healthy volunteers underwent CMR. The CS contours were traced from the 2-chamber view. A reformatted phase contrast plane was generated through the CS, and flow was quantified using 4D flow CMR over the cardiac cycle and normalised for myocardial mass. MBF and resistance (MyoR) was determined in ten healthy volunteers, ten patients with myocardial infarction (MI) without microvascular obstruction (MVO), and ten with known MVO.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MBF was quantified in all 30 subjects. MBF was highest in healthy controls (123.8 ± 48.4 mL/min), significantly lower in those with MI (85.7 ± 30.5 mL/min), and even lower in those with MI and MVO (67.9 ± 29.2 mL/min/) (<i>P</i> < 0.01 for both differences). Compared with healthy controls, MyoR was higher in those with MI and even higher in those with MI and MVO (0.79 (±0.35) versus 1.10 (±0.50) versus 1.50 (±0.69), <i>P</i>=0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MBF and MyoR can be quantified from 4D flow CMR. Resting MBF was reduced in patients with MI and MVO.</p>","PeriodicalId":9494,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology Research and Practice","volume":"2023 ","pages":"3875924"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9911256/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying Myocardial Blood Flow and Resistance Using 4D-Flow Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging.\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca C Gosling,&nbsp;Gareth Williams,&nbsp;Abdulaziz Al Baraikan,&nbsp;Samer Alabed,&nbsp;Eylem Levelt,&nbsp;Amrit Chowdhary,&nbsp;Peter P Swoboda,&nbsp;Ian Halliday,&nbsp;D Rodney Hose,&nbsp;Julian P Gunn,&nbsp;John P Greenwood,&nbsp;Sven Plein,&nbsp;Andrew J Swift,&nbsp;James M Wild,&nbsp;Pankaj Garg,&nbsp;Paul D Morris\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2023/3875924\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ischaemia with nonobstructive coronary arteries is most commonly caused by coronary microvascular dysfunction but remains difficult to diagnose without invasive testing. Myocardial blood flow (MBF) can be quantified noninvasively on stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) or positron emission tomography but neither is routinely used in clinical practice due to practical and technical constraints. Quantification of coronary sinus (CS) flow may represent a simpler method for CMR MBF quantification. 4D flow CMR offers comprehensive intracardiac and transvalvular flow quantification. However, it is feasibility to quantify MBF remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) and healthy volunteers underwent CMR. The CS contours were traced from the 2-chamber view. A reformatted phase contrast plane was generated through the CS, and flow was quantified using 4D flow CMR over the cardiac cycle and normalised for myocardial mass. MBF and resistance (MyoR) was determined in ten healthy volunteers, ten patients with myocardial infarction (MI) without microvascular obstruction (MVO), and ten with known MVO.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MBF was quantified in all 30 subjects. MBF was highest in healthy controls (123.8 ± 48.4 mL/min), significantly lower in those with MI (85.7 ± 30.5 mL/min), and even lower in those with MI and MVO (67.9 ± 29.2 mL/min/) (<i>P</i> < 0.01 for both differences). Compared with healthy controls, MyoR was higher in those with MI and even higher in those with MI and MVO (0.79 (±0.35) versus 1.10 (±0.50) versus 1.50 (±0.69), <i>P</i>=0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MBF and MyoR can be quantified from 4D flow CMR. Resting MBF was reduced in patients with MI and MVO.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiology Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\"2023 \",\"pages\":\"3875924\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9911256/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiology Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/3875924\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/3875924","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:非阻塞性冠状动脉缺血最常由冠状动脉微血管功能障碍引起,但在没有侵入性检查的情况下仍难以诊断。心肌血流量(MBF)可以通过应力灌注心脏磁共振(CMR)或正电子发射断层扫描(正电子发射断层扫描)无创量化,但由于实际和技术的限制,这两种方法在临床实践中都没有常规使用。冠状窦血流定量可能是CMR MBF定量的一种更简单的方法。4D血流CMR提供全面的心内和经瓣血流量化。然而,量化MBF的可行性尚不清楚。方法:对急性心肌梗死(MI)患者和健康志愿者进行CMR。从双腔视图追踪CS轮廓。通过CS生成重新格式化的相衬平面,并使用心脏周期内的4D血流CMR对血流进行量化,并对心肌质量进行归一化。测定10名健康志愿者、10名无微血管阻塞(MVO)心肌梗死(MI)患者和10名已知微血管阻塞(MVO)患者的MBF和阻力(MyoR)。结果:30例受试者均量化MBF。健康对照组MBF最高(123.8±48.4 mL/min),心肌梗死组MBF最低(85.7±30.5 mL/min),心肌梗死合并MVO组MBF最低(67.9±29.2 mL/min/) (P < 0.01)。与健康对照组相比,心肌梗死患者的MyoR更高,心肌梗死合并MVO患者的MyoR更高(0.79(±0.35)比1.10(±0.50)比1.50(±0.69),P=0.02)。结论:4D血流CMR可定量测定MBF和MyoR。心肌梗死和MVO患者静息MBF降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Quantifying Myocardial Blood Flow and Resistance Using 4D-Flow Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Quantifying Myocardial Blood Flow and Resistance Using 4D-Flow Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Quantifying Myocardial Blood Flow and Resistance Using 4D-Flow Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Quantifying Myocardial Blood Flow and Resistance Using 4D-Flow Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Background: Ischaemia with nonobstructive coronary arteries is most commonly caused by coronary microvascular dysfunction but remains difficult to diagnose without invasive testing. Myocardial blood flow (MBF) can be quantified noninvasively on stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) or positron emission tomography but neither is routinely used in clinical practice due to practical and technical constraints. Quantification of coronary sinus (CS) flow may represent a simpler method for CMR MBF quantification. 4D flow CMR offers comprehensive intracardiac and transvalvular flow quantification. However, it is feasibility to quantify MBF remains unknown.

Methods: Patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) and healthy volunteers underwent CMR. The CS contours were traced from the 2-chamber view. A reformatted phase contrast plane was generated through the CS, and flow was quantified using 4D flow CMR over the cardiac cycle and normalised for myocardial mass. MBF and resistance (MyoR) was determined in ten healthy volunteers, ten patients with myocardial infarction (MI) without microvascular obstruction (MVO), and ten with known MVO.

Results: MBF was quantified in all 30 subjects. MBF was highest in healthy controls (123.8 ± 48.4 mL/min), significantly lower in those with MI (85.7 ± 30.5 mL/min), and even lower in those with MI and MVO (67.9 ± 29.2 mL/min/) (P < 0.01 for both differences). Compared with healthy controls, MyoR was higher in those with MI and even higher in those with MI and MVO (0.79 (±0.35) versus 1.10 (±0.50) versus 1.50 (±0.69), P=0.02).

Conclusions: MBF and MyoR can be quantified from 4D flow CMR. Resting MBF was reduced in patients with MI and MVO.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiology Research and Practice
Cardiology Research and Practice Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Cardiology Research and Practice is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies that focus on the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. The journal welcomes submissions related to systemic hypertension, arrhythmia, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, vascular disease, congenital heart disease, and cardiomyopathy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信