赌徒谬误的数学剖析

Chance (New York, N.Y.) Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/09332480.2022.2038998

Steven Tijms

{"title":"赌徒谬误的数学剖析","authors":"Steven Tijms","doi":"10.1080/09332480.2022.2038998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The classic explanation of the gambler's fallacy, proposed exactly fifty years ago by Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman, describes the fallacy as a cognitive bias resulting from the psychological makeup of human judgment. We will show that the gambler's fallacy is not in fact a psychological phenomenon, but has its roots in the counter-intuitive mathematics of chance.","PeriodicalId":88226,"journal":{"name":"Chance (New York, N.Y.)","volume":"86 4 1","pages":"11 - 17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Mathematical Anatomy of the Gambler’s Fallacy\",\"authors\":\"Steven Tijms\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09332480.2022.2038998\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The classic explanation of the gambler's fallacy, proposed exactly fifty years ago by Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman, describes the fallacy as a cognitive bias resulting from the psychological makeup of human judgment. We will show that the gambler's fallacy is not in fact a psychological phenomenon, but has its roots in the counter-intuitive mathematics of chance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":88226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chance (New York, N.Y.)\",\"volume\":\"86 4 1\",\"pages\":\"11 - 17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chance (New York, N.Y.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09332480.2022.2038998\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chance (New York, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09332480.2022.2038998","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

50年前，阿莫斯·特沃斯基(Amos Tversky)和丹尼尔·卡尼曼(Daniel Kahneman)提出了对赌徒谬误的经典解释，将赌徒谬误描述为一种由人类判断的心理构成造成的认知偏差。我们将证明，赌徒谬误实际上不是一种心理现象，而是植根于反直觉的概率数学。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Mathematical Anatomy of the Gambler’s Fallacy

The classic explanation of the gambler's fallacy, proposed exactly fifty years ago by Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman, describes the fallacy as a cognitive bias resulting from the psychological makeup of human judgment. We will show that the gambler's fallacy is not in fact a psychological phenomenon, but has its roots in the counter-intuitive mathematics of chance.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Chance (New York, N.Y.)

自引率

0.00%

发文量