Hannah E Brindle, Behzad Nadjm, Marc Choisy, Rob Christley, Michael Griffiths, Stephen Baker, Juliet E Bryant, James I Campbell, Van Vinh Chau Nguyen, Thi Ngoc Diep Nguyen, Ty Thi Hang Vu, Van Hung Nguyen, Bao Long Hoang, Xuan Luat Le, Ha My Pham, Thi Dieu Ngan Ta, Dang Trung Nghia Ho, Thua Nguyen Tran, Thi Han Ny Nguyen, My Phuc Tran, Thi Hong Phuong Pham, Van Tan Le, Dac Thuan Nguyen, Thi Thu Trang Hau, Ngoc Vinh Nguyen, Heiman F L Wertheim, Guy E Thwaites, H Rogier van Doorn
{"title":"越南中枢神经系统感染的病因和潜在动物接触。","authors":"Hannah E Brindle, Behzad Nadjm, Marc Choisy, Rob Christley, Michael Griffiths, Stephen Baker, Juliet E Bryant, James I Campbell, Van Vinh Chau Nguyen, Thi Ngoc Diep Nguyen, Ty Thi Hang Vu, Van Hung Nguyen, Bao Long Hoang, Xuan Luat Le, Ha My Pham, Thi Dieu Ngan Ta, Dang Trung Nghia Ho, Thua Nguyen Tran, Thi Han Ny Nguyen, My Phuc Tran, Thi Hong Phuong Pham, Van Tan Le, Dac Thuan Nguyen, Thi Thu Trang Hau, Ngoc Vinh Nguyen, Heiman F L Wertheim, Guy E Thwaites, H Rogier van Doorn","doi":"10.1007/s10393-022-01611-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An estimated 73% of emerging infections are zoonotic in origin, with animal contact and encroachment on their habitats increasing the risk of spill-over events. In Vietnam, close exposure to a wide range of animals and animal products can lead to acquisition of zoonotic pathogens, a number of which cause central nervous system (CNS) infections. However, studies show the aetiology of CNS infections remains unknown in around half of cases. We used samples and data from hospitalised patients with CNS infections, enrolled into the Vietnam Initiative on Zoonotic Infections multicentre study, to determine the association between aetiology and animal contact including those in whom the cause was unknown. Among 933 patients, a pathogen or an antibody response to it was identified in 291 (31.2%, 95% CI 28.3-34.3%). The most common pathogens were Streptococcus suis (n = 91 (9.8%, 8.0-11.9%)) and Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) (n = 72 (7.7%, 6.1-9.7%)). Commonly reported animal contact included keeping, raising or handling (n = 364 (39.0%, 35.9-42.2%)) and handling, cooking or consuming raw meat, blood or viscera in the 2 weeks prior to symptom onset (n = 371 (39.8%, 36.6-43.0%)), with the latter most commonly from pigs (n = 343 (36.9%, 33.8-40.1%). There was no association between an unknown aetiology and exposure to animals in a multivariate logistic regression. Further testing for unknown or undetected pathogens may increase diagnostic yield, however, given the high proportion of zoonotic pathogens and the presence of risk factors, increasing public awareness about zoonoses and preventive measures can be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":51027,"journal":{"name":"Ecohealth","volume":"19 4","pages":"463-474"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9558024/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aetiology and Potential Animal Exposure in Central Nervous System Infections in Vietnam.\",\"authors\":\"Hannah E Brindle, Behzad Nadjm, Marc Choisy, Rob Christley, Michael Griffiths, Stephen Baker, Juliet E Bryant, James I Campbell, Van Vinh Chau Nguyen, Thi Ngoc Diep Nguyen, Ty Thi Hang Vu, Van Hung Nguyen, Bao Long Hoang, Xuan Luat Le, Ha My Pham, Thi Dieu Ngan Ta, Dang Trung Nghia Ho, Thua Nguyen Tran, Thi Han Ny Nguyen, My Phuc Tran, Thi Hong Phuong Pham, Van Tan Le, Dac Thuan Nguyen, Thi Thu Trang Hau, Ngoc Vinh Nguyen, Heiman F L Wertheim, Guy E Thwaites, H Rogier van Doorn\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10393-022-01611-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>An estimated 73% of emerging infections are zoonotic in origin, with animal contact and encroachment on their habitats increasing the risk of spill-over events. In Vietnam, close exposure to a wide range of animals and animal products can lead to acquisition of zoonotic pathogens, a number of which cause central nervous system (CNS) infections. However, studies show the aetiology of CNS infections remains unknown in around half of cases. We used samples and data from hospitalised patients with CNS infections, enrolled into the Vietnam Initiative on Zoonotic Infections multicentre study, to determine the association between aetiology and animal contact including those in whom the cause was unknown. Among 933 patients, a pathogen or an antibody response to it was identified in 291 (31.2%, 95% CI 28.3-34.3%). The most common pathogens were Streptococcus suis (n = 91 (9.8%, 8.0-11.9%)) and Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) (n = 72 (7.7%, 6.1-9.7%)). Commonly reported animal contact included keeping, raising or handling (n = 364 (39.0%, 35.9-42.2%)) and handling, cooking or consuming raw meat, blood or viscera in the 2 weeks prior to symptom onset (n = 371 (39.8%, 36.6-43.0%)), with the latter most commonly from pigs (n = 343 (36.9%, 33.8-40.1%). There was no association between an unknown aetiology and exposure to animals in a multivariate logistic regression. Further testing for unknown or undetected pathogens may increase diagnostic yield, however, given the high proportion of zoonotic pathogens and the presence of risk factors, increasing public awareness about zoonoses and preventive measures can be considered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51027,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecohealth\",\"volume\":\"19 4\",\"pages\":\"463-474\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9558024/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecohealth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-022-01611-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/10/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecohealth","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-022-01611-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
据估计,73% 的新发感染源于人畜共患病,动物接触和对动物栖息地的侵占增加了外溢事件的风险。在越南,密切接触各种动物和动物产品会导致感染人畜共患病病原体,其中一些病原体会引起中枢神经系统(CNS)感染。然而,研究表明,约有一半的中枢神经系统感染病例病因不明。我们利用越南人畜共患病多中心研究计划(Vietnam Initiative on Zoonotic Infections multicentre study)中登记的中枢神经系统感染住院患者的样本和数据,确定病因与动物接触(包括病因不明者)之间的关联。在 933 名患者中,有 291 人(31.2%,95% CI 28.3-34.3%)确定了病原体或对病原体的抗体反应。最常见的病原体是猪链球菌(91 人(9.8%,8.0-11.9%))和日本脑炎病毒(JEV)(72 人(7.7%,6.1-9.7%))。常见的动物接触包括饲养、饲养或处理动物(364 人(39.0%,35.9-42.2%)),以及在发病前两周内处理、烹饪或食用生肉、血液或内脏(371 人(39.8%,36.6-43.0%)),后者最常见于猪(343 人(36.9%,33.8-40.1%))。在多变量逻辑回归中,病因不明与接触动物之间没有关联。对未知或未检测到的病原体进行进一步检测可能会提高诊断率,不过,鉴于人畜共患病病原体的比例较高且存在风险因素,可以考虑提高公众对人畜共患病和预防措施的认识。
Aetiology and Potential Animal Exposure in Central Nervous System Infections in Vietnam.
An estimated 73% of emerging infections are zoonotic in origin, with animal contact and encroachment on their habitats increasing the risk of spill-over events. In Vietnam, close exposure to a wide range of animals and animal products can lead to acquisition of zoonotic pathogens, a number of which cause central nervous system (CNS) infections. However, studies show the aetiology of CNS infections remains unknown in around half of cases. We used samples and data from hospitalised patients with CNS infections, enrolled into the Vietnam Initiative on Zoonotic Infections multicentre study, to determine the association between aetiology and animal contact including those in whom the cause was unknown. Among 933 patients, a pathogen or an antibody response to it was identified in 291 (31.2%, 95% CI 28.3-34.3%). The most common pathogens were Streptococcus suis (n = 91 (9.8%, 8.0-11.9%)) and Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) (n = 72 (7.7%, 6.1-9.7%)). Commonly reported animal contact included keeping, raising or handling (n = 364 (39.0%, 35.9-42.2%)) and handling, cooking or consuming raw meat, blood or viscera in the 2 weeks prior to symptom onset (n = 371 (39.8%, 36.6-43.0%)), with the latter most commonly from pigs (n = 343 (36.9%, 33.8-40.1%). There was no association between an unknown aetiology and exposure to animals in a multivariate logistic regression. Further testing for unknown or undetected pathogens may increase diagnostic yield, however, given the high proportion of zoonotic pathogens and the presence of risk factors, increasing public awareness about zoonoses and preventive measures can be considered.
期刊介绍:
EcoHealth aims to advance research, practice, and knowledge integration at the interface of ecology and health by publishing high quality research and review articles that address and profile new ideas, developments, and programs. The journal’s scope encompasses research that integrates concepts and theory from many fields of scholarship (including ecological, social and health sciences, and the humanities) and draws upon multiple types of knowledge, including those of relevance to practice and policy. Papers address integrated ecology and health challenges arising in public health, human and veterinary medicine, conservation and ecosystem management, rural and urban development and planning, and other fields that address the social-ecological context of health. The journal is a central platform for fulfilling the mission of the EcoHealth Alliance to strive for sustainable health of people, domestic animals, wildlife, and ecosystems by promoting discovery, understanding, and transdisciplinarity.
The journal invites substantial contributions in the following areas:
One Health and Conservation Medicine
o Integrated research on health of humans, wildlife, livestock and ecosystems
o Research and policy in ecology, public health, and agricultural sustainability
o Emerging infectious diseases affecting people, wildlife, domestic animals, and plants
o Research and practice linking human and animal health and/or social-ecological systems
o Anthropogenic environmental change and drivers of disease emergence in humans, wildlife, livestock and ecosystems
o Health of humans and animals in relation to terrestrial, freshwater, and marine ecosystems
Ecosystem Approaches to Health
o Systems thinking and social-ecological systems in relation to health
o Transdiiplinary approaches to health, ecosystems and society.