腮腺部分浅表性切除与囊外解剖解剖治疗良性腮腺肿瘤。

Q3 Medicine
Spyros Laskaris, Dimosthenis Chrysikos, Ioannis Koutrafouris, Maria Piagkou, Vasileios Protogerou, Vasileios Karampelias, Filippos Bekos, Dimitrios Kotzias, Theodore Troupis
{"title":"腮腺部分浅表性切除与囊外解剖解剖治疗良性腮腺肿瘤。","authors":"Spyros Laskaris,&nbsp;Dimosthenis Chrysikos,&nbsp;Ioannis Koutrafouris,&nbsp;Maria Piagkou,&nbsp;Vasileios Protogerou,&nbsp;Vasileios Karampelias,&nbsp;Filippos Bekos,&nbsp;Dimitrios Kotzias,&nbsp;Theodore Troupis","doi":"10.5644/ama2006-124.376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Superficial benign parotid tumors are a common neoplasm of the salivary glands. Different surgical procedures have been applied for partial superficial parotidectomy (PSP) and extracapsular dissection (ECD), which are the two predominant surgical techniques. Our study aimed to evaluate PSP versus ECD for benign parotid tumors, in relation to post-operative complications and recurrence rates.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>266 patients who underwent parotidectomies of benign superficial parotid tumors were evaluated retrospectively. The first group (PSP group) was composed of 143 patients who underwent PSP, and the second group (ECD group) was composed of 123 patients who underwent ECD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the ECD group the rate of patients presenting with total postoperative permanent facial nerve paralysis, House-Brackmann grade III, was 0.8%, whereas in the PSP group it was 1.4%. Frey's syndrome was only reported in the PSP group. Salivary fistula occurred in both groups at similar rates. Sensation dysfunction due to greater auricular nerve division occurred in 72% patients in the PSP group and 10.6% in the ECD group. No statistical difference regarding recurrence rates was found between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both ECD and PSP procedures are safe surgical options for superficial parotidectomy in the treatment of benign tumors, with similar recurrence rates and post-surgical complications, apart from sensation abnormalities due to more extensive auricular nerve division.</p>","PeriodicalId":38313,"journal":{"name":"Acta medica academica","volume":"51 2","pages":"85-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b7/fa/AMA-51-85.PMC9982861.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Partial Superficial Parotidectomy Versus Extracapsular Anatomical Dissection for the Treatment of Benign Parotid Tumors.\",\"authors\":\"Spyros Laskaris,&nbsp;Dimosthenis Chrysikos,&nbsp;Ioannis Koutrafouris,&nbsp;Maria Piagkou,&nbsp;Vasileios Protogerou,&nbsp;Vasileios Karampelias,&nbsp;Filippos Bekos,&nbsp;Dimitrios Kotzias,&nbsp;Theodore Troupis\",\"doi\":\"10.5644/ama2006-124.376\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Superficial benign parotid tumors are a common neoplasm of the salivary glands. Different surgical procedures have been applied for partial superficial parotidectomy (PSP) and extracapsular dissection (ECD), which are the two predominant surgical techniques. Our study aimed to evaluate PSP versus ECD for benign parotid tumors, in relation to post-operative complications and recurrence rates.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>266 patients who underwent parotidectomies of benign superficial parotid tumors were evaluated retrospectively. The first group (PSP group) was composed of 143 patients who underwent PSP, and the second group (ECD group) was composed of 123 patients who underwent ECD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the ECD group the rate of patients presenting with total postoperative permanent facial nerve paralysis, House-Brackmann grade III, was 0.8%, whereas in the PSP group it was 1.4%. Frey's syndrome was only reported in the PSP group. Salivary fistula occurred in both groups at similar rates. Sensation dysfunction due to greater auricular nerve division occurred in 72% patients in the PSP group and 10.6% in the ECD group. No statistical difference regarding recurrence rates was found between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both ECD and PSP procedures are safe surgical options for superficial parotidectomy in the treatment of benign tumors, with similar recurrence rates and post-surgical complications, apart from sensation abnormalities due to more extensive auricular nerve division.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta medica academica\",\"volume\":\"51 2\",\"pages\":\"85-91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b7/fa/AMA-51-85.PMC9982861.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta medica academica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5644/ama2006-124.376\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta medica academica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5644/ama2006-124.376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:腮腺浅表良性肿瘤是一种常见的涎腺肿瘤。腮腺部分浅表性切除术(PSP)和囊外夹层切除术(ECD)是两种主要的手术技术。我们的研究旨在评估良性腮腺肿瘤的PSP与ECD的术后并发症和复发率的关系。材料与方法:对266例腮腺良性浅表性肿瘤行腮腺切除术的患者进行回顾性分析。第一组(PSP组)143例行PSP,第二组(ECD组)123例行ECD。结果:在ECD组中,术后出现完全永久性面神经麻痹(House-Brackmann III级)的患者比例为0.8%,而在PSP组中为1.4%。弗雷氏综合征仅在PSP组有报道。两组的唾液瘘发生率相似。72%的PSP组和10.6%的ECD组患者出现了由较大的耳神经分裂引起的感觉功能障碍。两组复发率无统计学差异。结论:ECD和PSP手术都是腮腺浅表切除术治疗良性肿瘤的安全选择,除了耳神经分裂更广泛导致感觉异常外,复发率和术后并发症相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Partial Superficial Parotidectomy Versus Extracapsular Anatomical Dissection for the Treatment of Benign Parotid Tumors.

Objectives: Superficial benign parotid tumors are a common neoplasm of the salivary glands. Different surgical procedures have been applied for partial superficial parotidectomy (PSP) and extracapsular dissection (ECD), which are the two predominant surgical techniques. Our study aimed to evaluate PSP versus ECD for benign parotid tumors, in relation to post-operative complications and recurrence rates.

Materials and methods: 266 patients who underwent parotidectomies of benign superficial parotid tumors were evaluated retrospectively. The first group (PSP group) was composed of 143 patients who underwent PSP, and the second group (ECD group) was composed of 123 patients who underwent ECD.

Results: In the ECD group the rate of patients presenting with total postoperative permanent facial nerve paralysis, House-Brackmann grade III, was 0.8%, whereas in the PSP group it was 1.4%. Frey's syndrome was only reported in the PSP group. Salivary fistula occurred in both groups at similar rates. Sensation dysfunction due to greater auricular nerve division occurred in 72% patients in the PSP group and 10.6% in the ECD group. No statistical difference regarding recurrence rates was found between the two groups.

Conclusions: Both ECD and PSP procedures are safe surgical options for superficial parotidectomy in the treatment of benign tumors, with similar recurrence rates and post-surgical complications, apart from sensation abnormalities due to more extensive auricular nerve division.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta medica academica
Acta medica academica Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信