经腹运动动作电位(Tamap)用于脊柱外科侧入路神经监测:51例新病例系列的概念验证演示

W. Taylor
{"title":"经腹运动动作电位(Tamap)用于脊柱外科侧入路神经监测:51例新病例系列的概念验证演示","authors":"W. Taylor","doi":"10.35248/2155-9562.20.11.510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Risk of nerve injury is well-documented in lateral approach spine surgery. Advanced intraoperative neuromonitoring techniques may improve false positive and false negative rates of traditional methods to decrease complications. Objective: Determine the safety, sensitivity, and methodological validity of transabdominal motor action potentials (TaMAP) recordings in lateral access spine surgery. Methods: Institutional Review Board approval was obtained for the prospective collection of patient data. Cathode and anode leads were placed on the posterior and anterior surfaces of back and abdomen, and motor responses were recorded by subdermal needle electrodes in 6 target muscles. Voltage and stimulation amplitude were measured at preoperative baseline, postoperative, and new baseline time points, and compared for muscle groups relevant to symptoms and operative approach. Results: In a total of 51 cases of lateral approach surgery, stimulation sensitivity was 100% for vastus medialis, anterior tibialis, and adductor magnus, followed by 98% in biceps femoris, 95% in gastrocnemius, and 33% for vastus lateralis measures. Decompression at L5/S1 resulted in a decrease in voltage in right gastrocnemius in 80% of cases, 80% of right vastus medialis (L3/L4), and in 58% of right anterior tibialis recordings (L4/5). No postoperative neurological complications were observed. Conclusions: TaMAP intraoperative monitoring is a safe, reliable, and sensitive MEP measure with ease-of-use that may serve as an alternative resource in neuromonitoring for spinal surgery. Sensitivity was observed to be as high as 100% for 3/6 muscle groups tested and with robust efficacy of decompression across a variety of procedures and pathologies, including degenerative spine disease and spinal tumor.","PeriodicalId":16455,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology and Neurophysiology","volume":"104 1","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transabdominal Motor Action Potentials (Tamap) for Lateral Approach Neuromonitoring in Spine Surgery: Novel Case Series of 51 Patients in Proof-ofConcept Demonstration\",\"authors\":\"W. Taylor\",\"doi\":\"10.35248/2155-9562.20.11.510\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Risk of nerve injury is well-documented in lateral approach spine surgery. Advanced intraoperative neuromonitoring techniques may improve false positive and false negative rates of traditional methods to decrease complications. Objective: Determine the safety, sensitivity, and methodological validity of transabdominal motor action potentials (TaMAP) recordings in lateral access spine surgery. Methods: Institutional Review Board approval was obtained for the prospective collection of patient data. Cathode and anode leads were placed on the posterior and anterior surfaces of back and abdomen, and motor responses were recorded by subdermal needle electrodes in 6 target muscles. Voltage and stimulation amplitude were measured at preoperative baseline, postoperative, and new baseline time points, and compared for muscle groups relevant to symptoms and operative approach. Results: In a total of 51 cases of lateral approach surgery, stimulation sensitivity was 100% for vastus medialis, anterior tibialis, and adductor magnus, followed by 98% in biceps femoris, 95% in gastrocnemius, and 33% for vastus lateralis measures. Decompression at L5/S1 resulted in a decrease in voltage in right gastrocnemius in 80% of cases, 80% of right vastus medialis (L3/L4), and in 58% of right anterior tibialis recordings (L4/5). No postoperative neurological complications were observed. Conclusions: TaMAP intraoperative monitoring is a safe, reliable, and sensitive MEP measure with ease-of-use that may serve as an alternative resource in neuromonitoring for spinal surgery. Sensitivity was observed to be as high as 100% for 3/6 muscle groups tested and with robust efficacy of decompression across a variety of procedures and pathologies, including degenerative spine disease and spinal tumor.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16455,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neurology and Neurophysiology\",\"volume\":\"104 1\",\"pages\":\"1-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neurology and Neurophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35248/2155-9562.20.11.510\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology and Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35248/2155-9562.20.11.510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:侧入路脊柱手术有神经损伤的风险。先进的术中神经监测技术可以提高传统方法的假阳性和假阴性率,减少并发症。目的:确定经腹运动动作电位(TaMAP)记录在脊柱侧通路手术中的安全性、敏感性和方法学有效性。方法:获得了机构审查委员会对前瞻性患者数据收集的批准。将阴极和阳极导线分别置于背部和腹部的前后表面,通过皮下针电极记录6块目标肌肉的运动反应。在术前基线、术后和新的基线时间点测量电压和刺激幅度,并比较与症状和手术入路相关的肌肉群。结果:51例外侧入路手术中,股内侧肌、胫骨前肌、大收肌的刺激敏感性为100%,股二头肌为98%,腓肠肌为95%,股外侧肌为33%。L5/S1减压导致80%的病例右腓肠肌电压下降,80%的病例右股内侧肌(L3/L4)电压下降,58%的病例右胫骨前肌(L4/5)电压下降。术后未见神经系统并发症。结论:TaMAP术中监测是一种安全、可靠、灵敏且易于使用的MEP测量方法,可作为脊柱外科神经监测的替代资源。在测试的3/6个肌群中,观察到灵敏度高达100%,并且在各种手术和病理(包括退行性脊柱疾病和脊柱肿瘤)中具有强大的减压效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transabdominal Motor Action Potentials (Tamap) for Lateral Approach Neuromonitoring in Spine Surgery: Novel Case Series of 51 Patients in Proof-ofConcept Demonstration
Background: Risk of nerve injury is well-documented in lateral approach spine surgery. Advanced intraoperative neuromonitoring techniques may improve false positive and false negative rates of traditional methods to decrease complications. Objective: Determine the safety, sensitivity, and methodological validity of transabdominal motor action potentials (TaMAP) recordings in lateral access spine surgery. Methods: Institutional Review Board approval was obtained for the prospective collection of patient data. Cathode and anode leads were placed on the posterior and anterior surfaces of back and abdomen, and motor responses were recorded by subdermal needle electrodes in 6 target muscles. Voltage and stimulation amplitude were measured at preoperative baseline, postoperative, and new baseline time points, and compared for muscle groups relevant to symptoms and operative approach. Results: In a total of 51 cases of lateral approach surgery, stimulation sensitivity was 100% for vastus medialis, anterior tibialis, and adductor magnus, followed by 98% in biceps femoris, 95% in gastrocnemius, and 33% for vastus lateralis measures. Decompression at L5/S1 resulted in a decrease in voltage in right gastrocnemius in 80% of cases, 80% of right vastus medialis (L3/L4), and in 58% of right anterior tibialis recordings (L4/5). No postoperative neurological complications were observed. Conclusions: TaMAP intraoperative monitoring is a safe, reliable, and sensitive MEP measure with ease-of-use that may serve as an alternative resource in neuromonitoring for spinal surgery. Sensitivity was observed to be as high as 100% for 3/6 muscle groups tested and with robust efficacy of decompression across a variety of procedures and pathologies, including degenerative spine disease and spinal tumor.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信