胃切除术前电针加速胃肠功能障碍的恢复:一项可行性研究。

IF 0.8 Q4 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Medical Acupuncture Pub Date : 2022-12-01 Epub Date: 2022-12-12 DOI:10.1089/acu.2021.0085
Liping Wang, Libing Huang, Sha Li, Jie Yang, Weiqian Tian, Fangbing Ji, Kangli Wu, Man Zheng
{"title":"胃切除术前电针加速胃肠功能障碍的恢复:一项可行性研究。","authors":"Liping Wang, Libing Huang, Sha Li, Jie Yang, Weiqian Tian, Fangbing Ji, Kangli Wu, Man Zheng","doi":"10.1089/acu.2021.0085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigated the feasibility and effectiveness of preoperative electroacupuncture (EA), given within 30 minutes before surgery, on postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction (PGD) in patients undergoing open gastrectomy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients (<i>N</i> = 60) undergoing open gastrectomy were allocated randomly to a usual care (UC) group (<i>n</i> = 30) or an EA group (<i>n</i> = 30). Patients in the EA group were given bilateral EA on ST-36 (<i>Zusanli</i>), ST-37 (<i>Shangjuxv</i>), and ST-39 (<i>Xiajuxv</i>) within 30 minutes before the surgery. The UC group had no acupuncture treatment. Primary outcomes were feasibility of recruitment, retention, acceptability, and patients' global satisfaction. Secondary outcomes included time to first flatus, defecation, liquid diet, incidence and severity of abdominal distension (AD), and incidence of postoperative nausea (PON) and postoperative vomiting (POV). EA-related adverse events were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 61 recruited patients, 1 declined to participate and 60 were randomized into the 2 study groups. All participants completed the interventions. On the acceptability questionnaire, participants' acceptance of EA was statistically improved after the treatment (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Global satisfaction was higher in the EA group (<i>P</i> < 0.001) at 8 (range: 7-8) versus the UC group at 6 (range: 5-7), and the proportion of patients with at least good satisfaction (numerical scale of more than 7 of 10) reached 80% in the EA group. Compared to the UC group, the EA group had a shorter time to first flatus (EA: 57.67 ± 23.09 hours versus 71.27 ± 17.78 hours; <i>P</i> = 0.013). There were no significant differences in time to first defecation (<i>P</i> = 0.081) and liquid diet (<i>P</i> = 0.068), AD (<i>P</i> = 0.436), PON (<i>P</i> = 0.667), or POV (<i>P</i> = 1.000). EA-related adverse events were similar in the 2 groups (<i>P</i> = 1.000).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EA is feasible, acceptable to patients, and associated with higher postoperative satisfaction in patients undergoing open gastrectomy. A large multicentered trial is needed to test the effectiveness of EA on PGD.</p>","PeriodicalId":45511,"journal":{"name":"Medical Acupuncture","volume":"34 6","pages":"371-379"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9805842/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electroacupuncture Before Gastrectomy Accelerates Recovery from Gastrointestinal Dysfunction: A Feasibility Study.\",\"authors\":\"Liping Wang, Libing Huang, Sha Li, Jie Yang, Weiqian Tian, Fangbing Ji, Kangli Wu, Man Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/acu.2021.0085\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigated the feasibility and effectiveness of preoperative electroacupuncture (EA), given within 30 minutes before surgery, on postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction (PGD) in patients undergoing open gastrectomy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients (<i>N</i> = 60) undergoing open gastrectomy were allocated randomly to a usual care (UC) group (<i>n</i> = 30) or an EA group (<i>n</i> = 30). Patients in the EA group were given bilateral EA on ST-36 (<i>Zusanli</i>), ST-37 (<i>Shangjuxv</i>), and ST-39 (<i>Xiajuxv</i>) within 30 minutes before the surgery. The UC group had no acupuncture treatment. Primary outcomes were feasibility of recruitment, retention, acceptability, and patients' global satisfaction. Secondary outcomes included time to first flatus, defecation, liquid diet, incidence and severity of abdominal distension (AD), and incidence of postoperative nausea (PON) and postoperative vomiting (POV). EA-related adverse events were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 61 recruited patients, 1 declined to participate and 60 were randomized into the 2 study groups. All participants completed the interventions. On the acceptability questionnaire, participants' acceptance of EA was statistically improved after the treatment (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Global satisfaction was higher in the EA group (<i>P</i> < 0.001) at 8 (range: 7-8) versus the UC group at 6 (range: 5-7), and the proportion of patients with at least good satisfaction (numerical scale of more than 7 of 10) reached 80% in the EA group. Compared to the UC group, the EA group had a shorter time to first flatus (EA: 57.67 ± 23.09 hours versus 71.27 ± 17.78 hours; <i>P</i> = 0.013). There were no significant differences in time to first defecation (<i>P</i> = 0.081) and liquid diet (<i>P</i> = 0.068), AD (<i>P</i> = 0.436), PON (<i>P</i> = 0.667), or POV (<i>P</i> = 1.000). EA-related adverse events were similar in the 2 groups (<i>P</i> = 1.000).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EA is feasible, acceptable to patients, and associated with higher postoperative satisfaction in patients undergoing open gastrectomy. A large multicentered trial is needed to test the effectiveness of EA on PGD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Acupuncture\",\"volume\":\"34 6\",\"pages\":\"371-379\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9805842/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Acupuncture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/acu.2021.0085\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/12/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Acupuncture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/acu.2021.0085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨术前30分钟电针治疗胃切除术患者术后胃肠功能障碍(PGD)的可行性和有效性。材料和方法:60例胃切除术患者随机分为常规护理组(UC)和EA组(EA)。EA组患者术前30分钟内分别在ST-36(足三里)、ST-37(上并置)、ST-39(下并置)进行双侧EA。UC组未进行针灸治疗。主要结局是招募的可行性、保留、可接受性和患者总体满意度。次要结局包括首次放屁时间、排便、流质饮食、腹胀(AD)的发生率和严重程度、术后恶心(PON)和术后呕吐(POV)的发生率。记录与ea相关的不良事件。结果:入选的61例患者中,1例拒绝参加,60例随机分为2个研究组。所有参与者都完成了干预。在可接受性问卷上,治疗后受试者对EA的接受度有统计学提高(P P P = 0.013)。两组首次排便时间(P = 0.081)、流食(P = 0.068)、AD (P = 0.436)、PON (P = 0.667)、POV (P = 1.000)差异均无统计学意义。两组患者ea相关不良事件相似(P = 1.000)。结论:EA是可行的,患者可接受的,并且与开放式胃切除术患者较高的术后满意度相关。需要一个大型的多中心试验来测试EA对PGD的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Electroacupuncture Before Gastrectomy Accelerates Recovery from Gastrointestinal Dysfunction: A Feasibility Study.

Objective: This study investigated the feasibility and effectiveness of preoperative electroacupuncture (EA), given within 30 minutes before surgery, on postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction (PGD) in patients undergoing open gastrectomy.

Materials and methods: Patients (N = 60) undergoing open gastrectomy were allocated randomly to a usual care (UC) group (n = 30) or an EA group (n = 30). Patients in the EA group were given bilateral EA on ST-36 (Zusanli), ST-37 (Shangjuxv), and ST-39 (Xiajuxv) within 30 minutes before the surgery. The UC group had no acupuncture treatment. Primary outcomes were feasibility of recruitment, retention, acceptability, and patients' global satisfaction. Secondary outcomes included time to first flatus, defecation, liquid diet, incidence and severity of abdominal distension (AD), and incidence of postoperative nausea (PON) and postoperative vomiting (POV). EA-related adverse events were recorded.

Results: Of the 61 recruited patients, 1 declined to participate and 60 were randomized into the 2 study groups. All participants completed the interventions. On the acceptability questionnaire, participants' acceptance of EA was statistically improved after the treatment (P < 0.001). Global satisfaction was higher in the EA group (P < 0.001) at 8 (range: 7-8) versus the UC group at 6 (range: 5-7), and the proportion of patients with at least good satisfaction (numerical scale of more than 7 of 10) reached 80% in the EA group. Compared to the UC group, the EA group had a shorter time to first flatus (EA: 57.67 ± 23.09 hours versus 71.27 ± 17.78 hours; P = 0.013). There were no significant differences in time to first defecation (P = 0.081) and liquid diet (P = 0.068), AD (P = 0.436), PON (P = 0.667), or POV (P = 1.000). EA-related adverse events were similar in the 2 groups (P = 1.000).

Conclusions: EA is feasible, acceptable to patients, and associated with higher postoperative satisfaction in patients undergoing open gastrectomy. A large multicentered trial is needed to test the effectiveness of EA on PGD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Acupuncture
Medical Acupuncture INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
18.20%
发文量
73
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信