Julia Cummerow, Katrin Obst, Edgar Voltmer, Thomas Kötter
{"title":"医学生应对压力及其预测因素的横断面研究","authors":"Julia Cummerow, Katrin Obst, Edgar Voltmer, Thomas Kötter","doi":"10.5116/ijme.63de.3840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To analyse stress coping styles of medical students at different time points of medical education and to identify predictors of functional coping.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted among medical students (N = 497, 361 women and 136 men) before year one (n = 141), after year one (n = 135) and after year five (n = 220). Students answered the Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced Inventory, the Work-Related Behaviour and Experience Patterns, the Perceived Medical School Stress Instrument and the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Multiple regression was used to examine factors associated with functional coping.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Single factor ANOVA indicated a significant difference for functional coping between the time points (F <sub>(2, 494)</sub> = 9.52, p < .01), with fifth-year students scoring significantly higher than students before or after year one. There was a significant difference in dysfunctional coping (F <sub>(2, 494)</sub> = 12.37, p < .01), with students before year one and after year five scoring higher than those after year one. Efficacy (β = 0.15, t <sub>(213)</sub> = 4.66, p < .01), emotional distancing (β = 0.04, t <sub>(213)</sub> = 3.50, p < .01) and satisfaction with life (β = 0.06, t <sub>(213)</sub> = 4.87, p < .01) were positive predictors of functional coping.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Scores for both functional and dysfunctional coping vary during medical education. The reasons for low coping scores after year one require further explanation. These findings represent a starting point for investigations into how to promote functional coping during early medical education.</p>","PeriodicalId":14029,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Education","volume":"14 ","pages":"11-18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10693402/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medical students' coping with stress and its predictors: a cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Julia Cummerow, Katrin Obst, Edgar Voltmer, Thomas Kötter\",\"doi\":\"10.5116/ijme.63de.3840\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To analyse stress coping styles of medical students at different time points of medical education and to identify predictors of functional coping.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted among medical students (N = 497, 361 women and 136 men) before year one (n = 141), after year one (n = 135) and after year five (n = 220). Students answered the Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced Inventory, the Work-Related Behaviour and Experience Patterns, the Perceived Medical School Stress Instrument and the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Multiple regression was used to examine factors associated with functional coping.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Single factor ANOVA indicated a significant difference for functional coping between the time points (F <sub>(2, 494)</sub> = 9.52, p < .01), with fifth-year students scoring significantly higher than students before or after year one. There was a significant difference in dysfunctional coping (F <sub>(2, 494)</sub> = 12.37, p < .01), with students before year one and after year five scoring higher than those after year one. Efficacy (β = 0.15, t <sub>(213)</sub> = 4.66, p < .01), emotional distancing (β = 0.04, t <sub>(213)</sub> = 3.50, p < .01) and satisfaction with life (β = 0.06, t <sub>(213)</sub> = 4.87, p < .01) were positive predictors of functional coping.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Scores for both functional and dysfunctional coping vary during medical education. The reasons for low coping scores after year one require further explanation. These findings represent a starting point for investigations into how to promote functional coping during early medical education.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Medical Education\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"11-18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10693402/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.63de.3840\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.63de.3840","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:分析医学生在医学教育不同时间点的压力应对方式,并探讨其功能应对的预测因素。方法:对医学生进行横断面研究(N = 497,361名女性和136名男性),第一年(N = 141),一年后(N = 135)和五年后(N = 220)。学生回答了“问题经验量表”、“工作行为与经验模式”、“医学院压力感知量表”和“马斯拉克职业倦怠量表”的简短应对倾向。采用多元回归方法分析与功能性应对相关的因素。结果:单因素方差分析显示,各时间点的功能应对差异有统计学意义(F (2,494) = 9.52, p < 0.01),五年级学生的得分显著高于一年级前后的学生。在功能障碍应对方面存在显著性差异(F (2,494) = 12.37, p < 0.01),一年级前和五年级后得分均高于一年级后。效能(β = 0.15, t (213) = 4.66, p < 0.01)、情绪距离(β = 0.04, t (213) = 3.50, p < 0.01)和生活满意度(β = 0.06, t (213) = 4.87, p < 0.01)是功能性应对的正向预测因子。结论:在医学教育过程中,功能应对和功能失调应对的得分存在差异。一年后应对得分低的原因需要进一步解释。这些发现为探讨如何在早期医学教育中促进功能性应对提供了一个起点。
Medical students' coping with stress and its predictors: a cross-sectional study.
Objectives: To analyse stress coping styles of medical students at different time points of medical education and to identify predictors of functional coping.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among medical students (N = 497, 361 women and 136 men) before year one (n = 141), after year one (n = 135) and after year five (n = 220). Students answered the Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced Inventory, the Work-Related Behaviour and Experience Patterns, the Perceived Medical School Stress Instrument and the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Multiple regression was used to examine factors associated with functional coping.
Results: Single factor ANOVA indicated a significant difference for functional coping between the time points (F (2, 494) = 9.52, p < .01), with fifth-year students scoring significantly higher than students before or after year one. There was a significant difference in dysfunctional coping (F (2, 494) = 12.37, p < .01), with students before year one and after year five scoring higher than those after year one. Efficacy (β = 0.15, t (213) = 4.66, p < .01), emotional distancing (β = 0.04, t (213) = 3.50, p < .01) and satisfaction with life (β = 0.06, t (213) = 4.87, p < .01) were positive predictors of functional coping.
Conclusions: Scores for both functional and dysfunctional coping vary during medical education. The reasons for low coping scores after year one require further explanation. These findings represent a starting point for investigations into how to promote functional coping during early medical education.