套筒胃切除术、Roux-en-Y胃旁路术和单吻合术胃旁路术后倾倒综合征的发生率。

Adisa Poljo, Andreas Pentsch, Sandra Raab, Bettina Klugsberger, Andreas Shamiyeh
{"title":"套筒胃切除术、Roux-en-Y胃旁路术和单吻合术胃旁路术后倾倒综合征的发生率。","authors":"Adisa Poljo,&nbsp;Andreas Pentsch,&nbsp;Sandra Raab,&nbsp;Bettina Klugsberger,&nbsp;Andreas Shamiyeh","doi":"10.17476/jmbs.2021.10.1.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Dumping syndrome (DS) is an important but often underreported problem occurring after bariatric surgery. It is believed that gastric bypass procedures like Roux-en-Y Gastric By-pass (RYGB) and One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) are more likely to cause DS than the pylorus-preserving Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG). The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of DS in patients undergoing SG, RYGB and OAGB.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective clinical study with 180 patients undergoing SG (n=50), RYGB (n=53) and OAGB (n=77) between 2016-2018 was performed. All clinical and demo-graphic data were assessed. The percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) was used to evaluate weight reduction. 127/180 (70.6%) patients took part in an additional phone interview. The incidence of DS was evaluated using validated Sigstad Score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Information about the occurrence of dumping symptoms and patient satisfaction was obtained from 127 patients. Median follow-up was 20.0±11.4 months. Significant differences between the surgical procedures were found for the duration of surgery, complications, weight loss, incidence of DS and satisfaction postoperatively. DS occurred in 15.6% after SG, 56.4% after RYGB and 42.9% after OAGB. A higher weight loss was observed in patients who experienced dumping symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present results show a clear superiority of SG regarding both perioperative results and incidence of DS compared to RYGB and OAGB and may impact clinicians and patients in their choice of procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":73828,"journal":{"name":"Journal of metabolic and bariatric surgery","volume":"10 1","pages":"23-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8a/a1/jmbs-10-23.PMC9847648.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidence of Dumping Syndrome after Sleeve Gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass.\",\"authors\":\"Adisa Poljo,&nbsp;Andreas Pentsch,&nbsp;Sandra Raab,&nbsp;Bettina Klugsberger,&nbsp;Andreas Shamiyeh\",\"doi\":\"10.17476/jmbs.2021.10.1.23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Dumping syndrome (DS) is an important but often underreported problem occurring after bariatric surgery. It is believed that gastric bypass procedures like Roux-en-Y Gastric By-pass (RYGB) and One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) are more likely to cause DS than the pylorus-preserving Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG). The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of DS in patients undergoing SG, RYGB and OAGB.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective clinical study with 180 patients undergoing SG (n=50), RYGB (n=53) and OAGB (n=77) between 2016-2018 was performed. All clinical and demo-graphic data were assessed. The percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) was used to evaluate weight reduction. 127/180 (70.6%) patients took part in an additional phone interview. The incidence of DS was evaluated using validated Sigstad Score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Information about the occurrence of dumping symptoms and patient satisfaction was obtained from 127 patients. Median follow-up was 20.0±11.4 months. Significant differences between the surgical procedures were found for the duration of surgery, complications, weight loss, incidence of DS and satisfaction postoperatively. DS occurred in 15.6% after SG, 56.4% after RYGB and 42.9% after OAGB. A higher weight loss was observed in patients who experienced dumping symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present results show a clear superiority of SG regarding both perioperative results and incidence of DS compared to RYGB and OAGB and may impact clinicians and patients in their choice of procedure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of metabolic and bariatric surgery\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"23-31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8a/a1/jmbs-10-23.PMC9847648.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of metabolic and bariatric surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17476/jmbs.2021.10.1.23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of metabolic and bariatric surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17476/jmbs.2021.10.1.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的:倾倒综合征(DS)是减肥手术后发生的一个重要但经常被低估的问题。一般认为,Roux-en-Y胃旁路(RYGB)和单吻合术胃旁路(OAGB)等胃旁路手术比保留幽门的袖式胃切除术(SG)更容易引起DS。本研究的目的是评估接受SG、RYGB和OAGB的患者DS的发生率。材料与方法:对2016-2018年间180例接受SG (n=50)、RYGB (n=53)和OAGB (n=77)的患者进行回顾性临床研究。评估了所有临床和人口统计学数据。超重减重百分比(%EWL)用于评价减重效果。127/180(70.6%)患者参加了额外的电话访谈。使用经过验证的Sigstad评分评估DS的发生率。结果:获得127例患者倾倒症状发生情况及患者满意度信息。中位随访时间为20.0±11.4个月。两种手术方式在手术时间、并发症、体重减轻、退行性椎体滑移发生率和术后满意度方面存在显著差异。SG组的DS发生率为15.6%,RYGB组为56.4%,OAGB组为42.9%。在出现倾倒症状的患者中观察到更高的体重减轻。结论:目前的研究结果表明,与RYGB和OAGB相比,SG在围手术期结果和DS发生率方面都有明显的优势,并可能影响临床医生和患者对手术方式的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Incidence of Dumping Syndrome after Sleeve Gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass.

Incidence of Dumping Syndrome after Sleeve Gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass.

Incidence of Dumping Syndrome after Sleeve Gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass.

Incidence of Dumping Syndrome after Sleeve Gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass.

Purpose: Dumping syndrome (DS) is an important but often underreported problem occurring after bariatric surgery. It is believed that gastric bypass procedures like Roux-en-Y Gastric By-pass (RYGB) and One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) are more likely to cause DS than the pylorus-preserving Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG). The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of DS in patients undergoing SG, RYGB and OAGB.

Materials and methods: A retrospective clinical study with 180 patients undergoing SG (n=50), RYGB (n=53) and OAGB (n=77) between 2016-2018 was performed. All clinical and demo-graphic data were assessed. The percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) was used to evaluate weight reduction. 127/180 (70.6%) patients took part in an additional phone interview. The incidence of DS was evaluated using validated Sigstad Score.

Results: Information about the occurrence of dumping symptoms and patient satisfaction was obtained from 127 patients. Median follow-up was 20.0±11.4 months. Significant differences between the surgical procedures were found for the duration of surgery, complications, weight loss, incidence of DS and satisfaction postoperatively. DS occurred in 15.6% after SG, 56.4% after RYGB and 42.9% after OAGB. A higher weight loss was observed in patients who experienced dumping symptoms.

Conclusion: The present results show a clear superiority of SG regarding both perioperative results and incidence of DS compared to RYGB and OAGB and may impact clinicians and patients in their choice of procedure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信