定量感觉测试在健康人和肩痛患者中的心理测量特性:系统综述。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Paraskevi Bilika, Achilleas Paliouras, Konstantina Savvoulidou, Alberto Arribas-Romano, Zacharias Dimitriadis, Evdokia Billis, Nikolaos Strimpakos, Eleni Kapreli
{"title":"定量感觉测试在健康人和肩痛患者中的心理测量特性:系统综述。","authors":"Paraskevi Bilika, Achilleas Paliouras, Konstantina Savvoulidou, Alberto Arribas-Romano, Zacharias Dimitriadis, Evdokia Billis, Nikolaos Strimpakos, Eleni Kapreli","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) is a psychophysical battery of various tests developed to quantify the subjects' self-reported sensory experience. Although the use of QST is valuable for the clinical assessment of pain, standard evaluation protocols have not yet been established. This systematic review aimed to investigate the level of evidence for the psychometric properties of QST in healthy and patients with shoulder pain. Eight databases were searched for peer-reviewed studies published until August 2021. The methodological quality of studies was evaluated using the COSMIN checklist. Twelve studies were included for qualitative synthesis, which included three different tests (Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT), Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM) and Temporal Summation (TS)). As the body of evidence consisted of studies of low methodological quality, the psychometric properties of PPT, CPM, and TS in healthy and patients with shoulder pain were classified as unknown. Although there is a risk that the conclusions may be 'superficial' in nature, the reliability seems to be nearly excellent for the PPT, however, the protocols' variation and the low methodological quality of the studies do not allow for clear conclusions. Further studies are required for the CPM and TS in patients with shoulder pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":16430,"journal":{"name":"Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions","volume":"23 1","pages":"145-164"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9f/d4/JMNI-23-145.PMC9976178.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric properties of quantitative sensory testing in healthy and patients with shoulder pain: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Paraskevi Bilika, Achilleas Paliouras, Konstantina Savvoulidou, Alberto Arribas-Romano, Zacharias Dimitriadis, Evdokia Billis, Nikolaos Strimpakos, Eleni Kapreli\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) is a psychophysical battery of various tests developed to quantify the subjects' self-reported sensory experience. Although the use of QST is valuable for the clinical assessment of pain, standard evaluation protocols have not yet been established. This systematic review aimed to investigate the level of evidence for the psychometric properties of QST in healthy and patients with shoulder pain. Eight databases were searched for peer-reviewed studies published until August 2021. The methodological quality of studies was evaluated using the COSMIN checklist. Twelve studies were included for qualitative synthesis, which included three different tests (Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT), Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM) and Temporal Summation (TS)). As the body of evidence consisted of studies of low methodological quality, the psychometric properties of PPT, CPM, and TS in healthy and patients with shoulder pain were classified as unknown. Although there is a risk that the conclusions may be 'superficial' in nature, the reliability seems to be nearly excellent for the PPT, however, the protocols' variation and the low methodological quality of the studies do not allow for clear conclusions. Further studies are required for the CPM and TS in patients with shoulder pain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"145-164\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9f/d4/JMNI-23-145.PMC9976178.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

定量感觉测试(QST)是由各种测试组成的心理物理测试,旨在量化受试者自我报告的感觉体验。虽然 QST 的使用对疼痛的临床评估很有价值,但标准评估方案尚未建立。本系统综述旨在研究 QST 在健康人和肩痛患者中的心理测量特性的证据水平。我们在八个数据库中检索了截至 2021 年 8 月发表的同行评审研究。研究的方法学质量采用 COSMIN 检查表进行评估。定性综合纳入了 12 项研究,其中包括三种不同的测试(压痛阈值(PPT)、条件性疼痛调制(CPM)和时相加(TS))。由于这些证据都是方法学质量不高的研究,因此 PPT、CPM 和 TS 在健康人和肩痛患者中的心理测量特性被归类为未知。虽然有可能得出 "肤浅 "的结论,但 PPT 的可靠性似乎近乎优秀,然而,研究方案的差异和研究方法的低质量并不能得出明确的结论。需要对肩痛患者的 CPM 和 TS 进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Psychometric properties of quantitative sensory testing in healthy and patients with shoulder pain: A systematic review.

Psychometric properties of quantitative sensory testing in healthy and patients with shoulder pain: A systematic review.

Psychometric properties of quantitative sensory testing in healthy and patients with shoulder pain: A systematic review.

Psychometric properties of quantitative sensory testing in healthy and patients with shoulder pain: A systematic review.

Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) is a psychophysical battery of various tests developed to quantify the subjects' self-reported sensory experience. Although the use of QST is valuable for the clinical assessment of pain, standard evaluation protocols have not yet been established. This systematic review aimed to investigate the level of evidence for the psychometric properties of QST in healthy and patients with shoulder pain. Eight databases were searched for peer-reviewed studies published until August 2021. The methodological quality of studies was evaluated using the COSMIN checklist. Twelve studies were included for qualitative synthesis, which included three different tests (Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT), Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM) and Temporal Summation (TS)). As the body of evidence consisted of studies of low methodological quality, the psychometric properties of PPT, CPM, and TS in healthy and patients with shoulder pain were classified as unknown. Although there is a risk that the conclusions may be 'superficial' in nature, the reliability seems to be nearly excellent for the PPT, however, the protocols' variation and the low methodological quality of the studies do not allow for clear conclusions. Further studies are required for the CPM and TS in patients with shoulder pain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Musculoskeletal and Neuronal Interactions (JMNI) is an academic journal dealing with the pathophysiology and treatment of musculoskeletal disorders. It is published quarterly (months of issue March, June, September, December). Its purpose is to publish original, peer-reviewed papers of research and clinical experience in all areas of the musculoskeletal system and its interactions with the nervous system, especially metabolic bone diseases, with particular emphasis on osteoporosis. Additionally, JMNI publishes the Abstracts from the biannual meetings of the International Society of Musculoskeletal and Neuronal Interactions, and hosts Abstracts of other meetings on topics related to the aims and scope of JMNI.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信