运用统计生命价值法进行职工补偿

Rattanmeek Kaur
{"title":"运用统计生命价值法进行职工补偿","authors":"Rattanmeek Kaur","doi":"10.21648/ARTHAVIJ/2020/V62/I1/194690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The method adopted under the Employee Compensation Act, 1923 for paying compensation in case of death of an employee suffers from anomalies which go to the very root of the legislation. It uses “loss of dependents” approach and only pays economic damages, ignoring hedonic damages. Therefore, the amount arrived at is inadequate, failing to achieve the objective of welfare legislation and does not generate optimum level of deterrence. Adverse consequences of which are unaccounted externalities and increase in the number of fatal accidents due to suboptimal level of precaution. This paper makes a case study of the construction sector in India to understand these two problems. The alternative which can be adopted is Value of a Statistical Approach which originates from hedonic approach. It measures the value of life in terms of utility derived from life. This method will internalise the social cost and produce an optimum level of deterrence. The paper suggests a framework using VSL approach which can be applied by the courts while paying damages.","PeriodicalId":84206,"journal":{"name":"Artha vijnana : journal of the Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics, Poona (India) = Artha vijnana : Gokhale Artha Sastra Samstha Dvara Prakasita Traimesika Patrika","volume":"79 1","pages":"23-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Value of Statistical Life Approach for Employee’s Compensation\",\"authors\":\"Rattanmeek Kaur\",\"doi\":\"10.21648/ARTHAVIJ/2020/V62/I1/194690\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The method adopted under the Employee Compensation Act, 1923 for paying compensation in case of death of an employee suffers from anomalies which go to the very root of the legislation. It uses “loss of dependents” approach and only pays economic damages, ignoring hedonic damages. Therefore, the amount arrived at is inadequate, failing to achieve the objective of welfare legislation and does not generate optimum level of deterrence. Adverse consequences of which are unaccounted externalities and increase in the number of fatal accidents due to suboptimal level of precaution. This paper makes a case study of the construction sector in India to understand these two problems. The alternative which can be adopted is Value of a Statistical Approach which originates from hedonic approach. It measures the value of life in terms of utility derived from life. This method will internalise the social cost and produce an optimum level of deterrence. The paper suggests a framework using VSL approach which can be applied by the courts while paying damages.\",\"PeriodicalId\":84206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Artha vijnana : journal of the Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics, Poona (India) = Artha vijnana : Gokhale Artha Sastra Samstha Dvara Prakasita Traimesika Patrika\",\"volume\":\"79 1\",\"pages\":\"23-37\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Artha vijnana : journal of the Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics, Poona (India) = Artha vijnana : Gokhale Artha Sastra Samstha Dvara Prakasita Traimesika Patrika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21648/ARTHAVIJ/2020/V62/I1/194690\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artha vijnana : journal of the Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics, Poona (India) = Artha vijnana : Gokhale Artha Sastra Samstha Dvara Prakasita Traimesika Patrika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21648/ARTHAVIJ/2020/V62/I1/194690","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1923年《雇员赔偿法》所采用的在雇员死亡情况下支付赔偿金的方法存在异常情况,这是该立法的根本问题。它采用“丧失家属”的方法,只支付经济损失,而忽略享乐损失。因此,所达到的数额是不够的,既不能达到福利立法的目标,也不能产生最佳的威慑水平。其不利后果是无法解释的外部性和由于预防水平不佳而导致的致命事故数量的增加。本文通过对印度建筑业的案例研究来了解这两个问题。另一种可以采用的方法是源自享乐主义方法的统计方法的价值。它以生命的效用来衡量生命的价值。这种方法将使社会成本内部化,并产生最佳的威慑水平。本文提出了一种法院在支付损害赔偿金时可以采用的VSL方法框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using Value of Statistical Life Approach for Employee’s Compensation
The method adopted under the Employee Compensation Act, 1923 for paying compensation in case of death of an employee suffers from anomalies which go to the very root of the legislation. It uses “loss of dependents” approach and only pays economic damages, ignoring hedonic damages. Therefore, the amount arrived at is inadequate, failing to achieve the objective of welfare legislation and does not generate optimum level of deterrence. Adverse consequences of which are unaccounted externalities and increase in the number of fatal accidents due to suboptimal level of precaution. This paper makes a case study of the construction sector in India to understand these two problems. The alternative which can be adopted is Value of a Statistical Approach which originates from hedonic approach. It measures the value of life in terms of utility derived from life. This method will internalise the social cost and produce an optimum level of deterrence. The paper suggests a framework using VSL approach which can be applied by the courts while paying damages.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信