评估丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼和丙泊酚-海德拉嗪对全身麻醉下泪囊鼻腔造口术出血量的影响

Ethnology Pub Date : 2023-08-31 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.4103/abr.abr_57_22
Hamidreza Shetabi, Seyed Jalal Hashemi, Somaye Ghaleshahi
{"title":"评估丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼和丙泊酚-海德拉嗪对全身麻醉下泪囊鼻腔造口术出血量的影响","authors":"Hamidreza Shetabi, Seyed Jalal Hashemi, Somaye Ghaleshahi","doi":"10.4103/abr.abr_57_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The present study was performed to compare the effectiveness of propofol-remifentanil and propofol-hydralazine in inducing controlled hypotension in patients undergoing the dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) surgery and reducing their bleeding volume during surgery.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The present double-blind, randomized clinical trial was performed on 70 patients who were candidates for DCR surgery and divided into two groups. In both the groups, general anesthesia protocol was performed. Moreover, in the first group, a syringe containing 2 mg of remifentanil in 20 ml of distilled water (0.1 mg/ml) was infused at the rate of 0.15 μg/kg/min (P + R group). In the second group, a syringe containing 20 mg of hydralazine in 20 ml of distilled water (1 mg/ml) was infused at the rate of 0.5-10 mg/h (P + H group).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The hemodynamic parameters were not significantly different between the two groups in the studied times (<i>P</i> > 0.05). In contrast, the bleeding volume in the P + R group with the mean of 61.29 ± 50.06 ml was significantly lower than that of the P + H group with the mean of 152.31 ± 90.81 ml (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Moreover, the mean score of surgeon's satisfaction level in the P + R group was higher than that of the P + H group (5.91 ± 0.28 vs. 4.29 ± 0.65; <i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to the results of this study, there was no significant difference between the P + H and P + R groups in terms of fluctuations in the hemodynamic parameters and the occurrence of complications. However, a reduction in the bleeding volume and a higher satisfaction level of the surgeon were observed in the P + R group compared with the P + H group.</p>","PeriodicalId":81209,"journal":{"name":"Ethnology","volume":"15 1","pages":"207"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10699216/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the Effect of Propofol-Remifentanil and Propofol-Hydralazine on the Bleeding Volume During Dacryocystorhinostomy Surgery Under General Anesthesia.\",\"authors\":\"Hamidreza Shetabi, Seyed Jalal Hashemi, Somaye Ghaleshahi\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/abr.abr_57_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The present study was performed to compare the effectiveness of propofol-remifentanil and propofol-hydralazine in inducing controlled hypotension in patients undergoing the dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) surgery and reducing their bleeding volume during surgery.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The present double-blind, randomized clinical trial was performed on 70 patients who were candidates for DCR surgery and divided into two groups. In both the groups, general anesthesia protocol was performed. Moreover, in the first group, a syringe containing 2 mg of remifentanil in 20 ml of distilled water (0.1 mg/ml) was infused at the rate of 0.15 μg/kg/min (P + R group). In the second group, a syringe containing 20 mg of hydralazine in 20 ml of distilled water (1 mg/ml) was infused at the rate of 0.5-10 mg/h (P + H group).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The hemodynamic parameters were not significantly different between the two groups in the studied times (<i>P</i> > 0.05). In contrast, the bleeding volume in the P + R group with the mean of 61.29 ± 50.06 ml was significantly lower than that of the P + H group with the mean of 152.31 ± 90.81 ml (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Moreover, the mean score of surgeon's satisfaction level in the P + R group was higher than that of the P + H group (5.91 ± 0.28 vs. 4.29 ± 0.65; <i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to the results of this study, there was no significant difference between the P + H and P + R groups in terms of fluctuations in the hemodynamic parameters and the occurrence of complications. However, a reduction in the bleeding volume and a higher satisfaction level of the surgeon were observed in the P + R group compared with the P + H group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":81209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethnology\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"207\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10699216/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethnology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/abr.abr_57_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/abr.abr_57_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究背景本研究旨在比较异丙酚-瑞芬太尼和异丙酚-利多卡因在诱导接受泪囊鼻腔吻合术(DCR)手术的患者控制低血压和减少术中出血量方面的效果:本双盲、随机临床试验以 70 例 DCR 手术候选患者为对象,分为两组。两组均采用全身麻醉方案。此外,在第一组中,在 20 毫升蒸馏水(0.1 毫克/毫升)中加入 2 毫克瑞芬太尼的注射器以 0.15 微克/千克/分钟的速度注入(P + R 组)。第二组在 20 毫升蒸馏水(1 毫克/毫升)中加入 20 毫克肼屈嗪,以 0.5-10 毫克/小时的速度输注(P + H 组):两组在研究时间内的血液动力学参数无明显差异(P>0.05)。相反,P + R 组的出血量(平均值为 61.29 ± 50.06 毫升)明显低于 P + H 组(平均值为 152.31 ± 90.81 毫升)(P < 0.001)。此外,P + R 组外科医生满意度的平均得分高于 P + H 组(5.91 ± 0.28 vs. 4.29 ± 0.65;P < 0.001):本研究结果显示,P + H 组和 P + R 组在血流动力学参数波动和并发症发生方面没有显著差异。不过,与 P + H 组相比,P + R 组的出血量减少,外科医生的满意度更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the Effect of Propofol-Remifentanil and Propofol-Hydralazine on the Bleeding Volume During Dacryocystorhinostomy Surgery Under General Anesthesia.

Background: The present study was performed to compare the effectiveness of propofol-remifentanil and propofol-hydralazine in inducing controlled hypotension in patients undergoing the dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) surgery and reducing their bleeding volume during surgery.

Materials and methods: The present double-blind, randomized clinical trial was performed on 70 patients who were candidates for DCR surgery and divided into two groups. In both the groups, general anesthesia protocol was performed. Moreover, in the first group, a syringe containing 2 mg of remifentanil in 20 ml of distilled water (0.1 mg/ml) was infused at the rate of 0.15 μg/kg/min (P + R group). In the second group, a syringe containing 20 mg of hydralazine in 20 ml of distilled water (1 mg/ml) was infused at the rate of 0.5-10 mg/h (P + H group).

Results: The hemodynamic parameters were not significantly different between the two groups in the studied times (P > 0.05). In contrast, the bleeding volume in the P + R group with the mean of 61.29 ± 50.06 ml was significantly lower than that of the P + H group with the mean of 152.31 ± 90.81 ml (P < 0.001). Moreover, the mean score of surgeon's satisfaction level in the P + R group was higher than that of the P + H group (5.91 ± 0.28 vs. 4.29 ± 0.65; P < 0.001).

Conclusion: According to the results of this study, there was no significant difference between the P + H and P + R groups in terms of fluctuations in the hemodynamic parameters and the occurrence of complications. However, a reduction in the bleeding volume and a higher satisfaction level of the surgeon were observed in the P + R group compared with the P + H group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信