细节的范例性:阿伦特论有效性

IF 0.1 4区文学 0 LITERATURE

ARCADIA Pub Date : 2021-11-01 DOI:10.1515/arcadia-2021-9026

Martin Blumenthal-Barby

{"title":"细节的范例性:阿伦特论有效性","authors":"Martin Blumenthal-Barby","doi":"10.1515/arcadia-2021-9026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract When Hannah Arendt delivered her Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy at the New School for Social Research in 1970, she held a seminar on Kant’s Critique of Judgment to explore aspects of her lecture course in greater detail. This essay probes Arendt’s seminar notes with an eye to the concept of ‘exemplary validity,’ which is at the core of her theory of judgment. Notably, her analysis repeatedly draws on the force of examples, that is, the force of ‘exemplary validity.’ Her theorization of judgment, itself inevitably subject to her own judgment, can be understood as an enactment of and commentary on the very matter she discusses. It is not by chance but rather symptomatic that her argumentation is permeated by strategically placed examples that seek to persuade us by dint of their exemplary validity.","PeriodicalId":43010,"journal":{"name":"ARCADIA","volume":"1 1","pages":"243 - 251"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Exemplarity of Particulars: Arendt on Validity\",\"authors\":\"Martin Blumenthal-Barby\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/arcadia-2021-9026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract When Hannah Arendt delivered her Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy at the New School for Social Research in 1970, she held a seminar on Kant’s Critique of Judgment to explore aspects of her lecture course in greater detail. This essay probes Arendt’s seminar notes with an eye to the concept of ‘exemplary validity,’ which is at the core of her theory of judgment. Notably, her analysis repeatedly draws on the force of examples, that is, the force of ‘exemplary validity.’ Her theorization of judgment, itself inevitably subject to her own judgment, can be understood as an enactment of and commentary on the very matter she discusses. It is not by chance but rather symptomatic that her argumentation is permeated by strategically placed examples that seek to persuade us by dint of their exemplary validity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43010,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ARCADIA\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"243 - 251\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ARCADIA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/arcadia-2021-9026\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARCADIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/arcadia-2021-9026","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

1970年，汉娜·阿伦特在新社会研究学院进行康德政治哲学讲座时，举办了一场关于康德《判断批判》的研讨会，更详细地探讨了讲座的各个方面。本文探讨了阿伦特的研讨会笔记，着眼于“示范有效性”的概念，这是她的判断理论的核心。值得注意的是，她的分析反复利用例子的力量，即“范例有效性”的力量。她对判断的理论化，本身不可避免地受制于她自己的判断，可以理解为对她所讨论的问题的制定和评论。她的论证中充满了策略性地放置的例子，这些例子试图通过其典范的有效性来说服我们，这不是偶然的，而是一种症状。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Exemplarity of Particulars: Arendt on Validity

Abstract When Hannah Arendt delivered her Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy at the New School for Social Research in 1970, she held a seminar on Kant’s Critique of Judgment to explore aspects of her lecture course in greater detail. This essay probes Arendt’s seminar notes with an eye to the concept of ‘exemplary validity,’ which is at the core of her theory of judgment. Notably, her analysis repeatedly draws on the force of examples, that is, the force of ‘exemplary validity.’ Her theorization of judgment, itself inevitably subject to her own judgment, can be understood as an enactment of and commentary on the very matter she discusses. It is not by chance but rather symptomatic that her argumentation is permeated by strategically placed examples that seek to persuade us by dint of their exemplary validity.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

ARCADIA LITERATURE-

CiteScore

0.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： arcadia provides a forum for internationally comparative studies that deal with literatures and liberal arts from all parts of the world. Current theories associated with these literatures and liberal arts are discussed. arcadia includes the columns: essays, miscellanea, reviews, submitted works and news.