分娩教育:比较分析

Matilde Fernández y Fernández-Arroyo
{"title":"分娩教育:比较分析","authors":"Matilde Fernández y Fernández-Arroyo","doi":"10.5772/INTECHOPEN.88021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prenatal education programs are a powerful tool to increase maternal and child health. Today, no one knows the most effective educational approach. The objective of the study is to identify differences in approaching and methodology of major schools of childbirth education. Methodology includes the review of the databases such as PubMed, Embase, Lilacs, Scielo and Cochrane since 2000; review the websites of the schools; study the documentation using the comparative method; and analysis using a database with Excel. Results analyzed and compared the five old one schools and 12 of emerging new one schools. The chapter concludes the concep-tual approach and methodology of the schools, which can facilitate the choice for professionals and research design to increase the quality of programs.","PeriodicalId":77268,"journal":{"name":"Midwifery today and childbirth education","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Childbirth Education: Comparative Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Matilde Fernández y Fernández-Arroyo\",\"doi\":\"10.5772/INTECHOPEN.88021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Prenatal education programs are a powerful tool to increase maternal and child health. Today, no one knows the most effective educational approach. The objective of the study is to identify differences in approaching and methodology of major schools of childbirth education. Methodology includes the review of the databases such as PubMed, Embase, Lilacs, Scielo and Cochrane since 2000; review the websites of the schools; study the documentation using the comparative method; and analysis using a database with Excel. Results analyzed and compared the five old one schools and 12 of emerging new one schools. The chapter concludes the concep-tual approach and methodology of the schools, which can facilitate the choice for professionals and research design to increase the quality of programs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":77268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Midwifery today and childbirth education\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Midwifery today and childbirth education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5772/INTECHOPEN.88021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Midwifery today and childbirth education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5772/INTECHOPEN.88021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

产前教育规划是提高孕产妇和儿童健康的有力工具。今天,没有人知道最有效的教育方法。该研究的目的是确定在接近和方法的主要学校分娩教育的差异。方法包括对2000年以来PubMed、Embase、Lilacs、Scielo和Cochrane等数据库的回顾;检讨学校的网站;采用比较法研究文献资料;并使用Excel数据库进行分析。结果分析比较了5所老第一所学校和12所新兴第一所学校。本章总结了学校的概念方法和方法论,有助于专业人员的选择和研究设计,以提高课程质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Childbirth Education: Comparative Analysis
Prenatal education programs are a powerful tool to increase maternal and child health. Today, no one knows the most effective educational approach. The objective of the study is to identify differences in approaching and methodology of major schools of childbirth education. Methodology includes the review of the databases such as PubMed, Embase, Lilacs, Scielo and Cochrane since 2000; review the websites of the schools; study the documentation using the comparative method; and analysis using a database with Excel. Results analyzed and compared the five old one schools and 12 of emerging new one schools. The chapter concludes the concep-tual approach and methodology of the schools, which can facilitate the choice for professionals and research design to increase the quality of programs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信