门诊脑电图在脑卒中相关急性症状性癫痫患者常规临床护理中的应用。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-09 DOI:10.1097/WNP.0000000000000992
Pradeep Chandan, Marie E Byrnes, Christopher Newey, Stephen Hantus, Vineet Punia
{"title":"门诊脑电图在脑卒中相关急性症状性癫痫患者常规临床护理中的应用。","authors":"Pradeep Chandan, Marie E Byrnes, Christopher Newey, Stephen Hantus, Vineet Punia","doi":"10.1097/WNP.0000000000000992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Acute symptomatic seizures (ASyS) after stroke contribute the highest risk to poststroke epilepsy (PSE) development. We investigated the use of outpatient EEG (oEEG) among stroke patients with ASyS concerns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults with acute stroke, ASyS concerns (underwent cEEG), and outpatient clinical follow-up were included (study population). Patients with oEEG (oEEG cohort) were analyzed for electrographic findings. Univariable and multivariable analyses helped identify predictors of oEEG use in routine clinical care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 507 patients, 83 (16.4%) underwent oEEG. The independent predictors of oEEG utilization included age (OR = 1.03 [1.01 to 1.05, P = 0.01]), electrographic ASyS on cEEG (OR 3.9 [1.77 to 8.9], P < 0.001), ASMs at discharge (OR 3.6 [1.9 to 6.6], P < 0.001), PSE development (OR 6.6 [3.5 to 12.6], P < 0.001), and follow-up duration (OR = 1.01 [1.002 to 1.02], P = 0.016). Almost 40% of oEEG cohort developed PSE, but only 12% had epileptiform abnormalities. Close to a quarter (23%) of oEEGs were within normal limits.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>One in six patients with ASyS concern after stroke undergoes oEEG. Electrographic ASyS, PSE development, and ASM at discharge are primary drivers of oEEG use. While PSE drives oEEG use, we need systematic, prospective investigation of outpatient EEG's role as prognostic tool for PSE development.</p>","PeriodicalId":15516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"312-316"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outpatient EEG in Routine Clinical Care of Patients With Stroke-Related Acute Symptomatic Seizure Concerns.\",\"authors\":\"Pradeep Chandan, Marie E Byrnes, Christopher Newey, Stephen Hantus, Vineet Punia\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/WNP.0000000000000992\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Acute symptomatic seizures (ASyS) after stroke contribute the highest risk to poststroke epilepsy (PSE) development. We investigated the use of outpatient EEG (oEEG) among stroke patients with ASyS concerns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults with acute stroke, ASyS concerns (underwent cEEG), and outpatient clinical follow-up were included (study population). Patients with oEEG (oEEG cohort) were analyzed for electrographic findings. Univariable and multivariable analyses helped identify predictors of oEEG use in routine clinical care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 507 patients, 83 (16.4%) underwent oEEG. The independent predictors of oEEG utilization included age (OR = 1.03 [1.01 to 1.05, P = 0.01]), electrographic ASyS on cEEG (OR 3.9 [1.77 to 8.9], P < 0.001), ASMs at discharge (OR 3.6 [1.9 to 6.6], P < 0.001), PSE development (OR 6.6 [3.5 to 12.6], P < 0.001), and follow-up duration (OR = 1.01 [1.002 to 1.02], P = 0.016). Almost 40% of oEEG cohort developed PSE, but only 12% had epileptiform abnormalities. Close to a quarter (23%) of oEEGs were within normal limits.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>One in six patients with ASyS concern after stroke undergoes oEEG. Electrographic ASyS, PSE development, and ASM at discharge are primary drivers of oEEG use. While PSE drives oEEG use, we need systematic, prospective investigation of outpatient EEG's role as prognostic tool for PSE development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"312-316\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000000992\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/3/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000000992","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:卒中后急性症状性癫痫发作(ASyS)是卒中后癫痫(PSE)发病的最高风险因素。我们调查了有 ASyS 问题的中风患者使用门诊脑电图(oEEG)的情况:方法:纳入急性中风、有 ASyS 问题(接受 cEEG 检查)和门诊临床随访的成人(研究人群)。对有 oEEG 的患者(oEEG 队列)进行电图结果分析。单变量和多变量分析有助于确定在常规临床护理中使用 oEEG 的预测因素:在 507 名患者中,83 人(16.4%)接受了 oEEG 检查。使用 oEEG 的独立预测因素包括年龄(OR = 1.03 [1.01 至 1.05,P = 0.01])、cEEG 上的电图 ASyS(OR 3.9 [1.77 至 8.9],P < 0.001), ASMs at discharge (OR 3.6 [1.9 to 6.6], P < 0.001), PSE development (OR 6.6 [3.5 to 12.6], P < 0.001), and follow-up duration (OR = 1.01 [1.002 to 1.02], P = 0.016)。近 40% 的 oEEG 患者出现 PSE,但只有 12% 的患者出现癫痫样异常。近四分之一(23%)的oEEG在正常范围内:结论:每六名脑卒中 ASyS 患者中就有一人接受了 oEEG 检查。电图 ASyS、PSE 发展和出院时 ASM 是使用 oEEG 的主要驱动因素。虽然 PSE 推动了 oEEG 的使用,但我们需要对门诊 EEG 作为 PSE 发展预后工具的作用进行系统的前瞻性调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outpatient EEG in Routine Clinical Care of Patients With Stroke-Related Acute Symptomatic Seizure Concerns.

Purpose: Acute symptomatic seizures (ASyS) after stroke contribute the highest risk to poststroke epilepsy (PSE) development. We investigated the use of outpatient EEG (oEEG) among stroke patients with ASyS concerns.

Methods: Adults with acute stroke, ASyS concerns (underwent cEEG), and outpatient clinical follow-up were included (study population). Patients with oEEG (oEEG cohort) were analyzed for electrographic findings. Univariable and multivariable analyses helped identify predictors of oEEG use in routine clinical care.

Results: Among 507 patients, 83 (16.4%) underwent oEEG. The independent predictors of oEEG utilization included age (OR = 1.03 [1.01 to 1.05, P = 0.01]), electrographic ASyS on cEEG (OR 3.9 [1.77 to 8.9], P < 0.001), ASMs at discharge (OR 3.6 [1.9 to 6.6], P < 0.001), PSE development (OR 6.6 [3.5 to 12.6], P < 0.001), and follow-up duration (OR = 1.01 [1.002 to 1.02], P = 0.016). Almost 40% of oEEG cohort developed PSE, but only 12% had epileptiform abnormalities. Close to a quarter (23%) of oEEGs were within normal limits.

Conclusions: One in six patients with ASyS concern after stroke undergoes oEEG. Electrographic ASyS, PSE development, and ASM at discharge are primary drivers of oEEG use. While PSE drives oEEG use, we need systematic, prospective investigation of outpatient EEG's role as prognostic tool for PSE development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
198
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology features both topical reviews and original research in both central and peripheral neurophysiology, as related to patient evaluation and treatment. Official Journal of the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信