肾移植受者他克莫司配方、暴露变异性和结果。

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
Elaine F Lai, Huong Thao Nguyen, Olusegun Famure, Yanhong Li, S Joseph Kim
{"title":"肾移植受者他克莫司配方、暴露变异性和结果。","authors":"Elaine F Lai,&nbsp;Huong Thao Nguyen,&nbsp;Olusegun Famure,&nbsp;Yanhong Li,&nbsp;S Joseph Kim","doi":"10.1177/15269248221145044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Few studies have compared within-patient variability measures of tacrolimus trough levels by formulation and assessed within-patient variability on outcomes of kidney transplant recipients.</p><p><strong>Research questions: </strong>(1) To compare within-patient variability of trough levels when converting from twice-daily to once-daily tacrolimus using standard deviation, coefficient of variation, and intrapatient variability percent. (2) To use the 3 measures of variability to examine the relationship between tacrolimus once-daily within-patient variability and total graft failure (i.e., return to chronic dialysis, pre-emptive retransplant, death with graft function).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>In this observational cohort study, within-patient variability of trough levels pre- and post-conversion from twice-daily to once-daily tacrolimus were compared using Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test. Graft outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 463 patients, within-patient variability differences pre- and post-conversion of median standard deviation, coefficient of variation, and intrapatient variability percent were -0.16 (<i>P</i> = 0.09), -0.01 (<i>P</i> = 0.52), and -1.41 (<i>P</i> = 0.32), respectively. Post-conversion, every 1 unit increase in within-patient variability standard deviation and intrapatient variability percent and every 0.1 unit increase in the coefficient of variation was associated with an increased hazard ratio [1.19 (<i>P</i> = 0.004), 1.02 (<i>P</i> = 0.030), 1.13 (<i>P</i> = 0.001), respectively] of total graft failure. Post-conversion, within-patient variability above cohort medians using standard deviation and coefficient of variation had a significantly higher risk of total graft failure.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Under a program-wide conversion, no significant difference was observed in within-patient variability post-conversion from twice-daily to once-daily tacrolimus using the three measures of variability. High within-patient variability was associated with adverse transplant outcomes post-conversion.</p>","PeriodicalId":20671,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Transplantation","volume":"33 1","pages":"34-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/93/13/10.1177_15269248221145044.PMC9968997.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tacrolimus Formulation, Exposure Variability, and Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients.\",\"authors\":\"Elaine F Lai,&nbsp;Huong Thao Nguyen,&nbsp;Olusegun Famure,&nbsp;Yanhong Li,&nbsp;S Joseph Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15269248221145044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Few studies have compared within-patient variability measures of tacrolimus trough levels by formulation and assessed within-patient variability on outcomes of kidney transplant recipients.</p><p><strong>Research questions: </strong>(1) To compare within-patient variability of trough levels when converting from twice-daily to once-daily tacrolimus using standard deviation, coefficient of variation, and intrapatient variability percent. (2) To use the 3 measures of variability to examine the relationship between tacrolimus once-daily within-patient variability and total graft failure (i.e., return to chronic dialysis, pre-emptive retransplant, death with graft function).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>In this observational cohort study, within-patient variability of trough levels pre- and post-conversion from twice-daily to once-daily tacrolimus were compared using Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test. Graft outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 463 patients, within-patient variability differences pre- and post-conversion of median standard deviation, coefficient of variation, and intrapatient variability percent were -0.16 (<i>P</i> = 0.09), -0.01 (<i>P</i> = 0.52), and -1.41 (<i>P</i> = 0.32), respectively. Post-conversion, every 1 unit increase in within-patient variability standard deviation and intrapatient variability percent and every 0.1 unit increase in the coefficient of variation was associated with an increased hazard ratio [1.19 (<i>P</i> = 0.004), 1.02 (<i>P</i> = 0.030), 1.13 (<i>P</i> = 0.001), respectively] of total graft failure. Post-conversion, within-patient variability above cohort medians using standard deviation and coefficient of variation had a significantly higher risk of total graft failure.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Under a program-wide conversion, no significant difference was observed in within-patient variability post-conversion from twice-daily to once-daily tacrolimus using the three measures of variability. High within-patient variability was associated with adverse transplant outcomes post-conversion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"34-42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/93/13/10.1177_15269248221145044.PMC9968997.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15269248221145044\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15269248221145044","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导论:很少有研究比较了他克莫司通过配方谷水平的患者内变异性测量,并评估了肾移植受者结果的患者内变异性。研究问题:(1)使用标准差、变异系数和患者内变异性百分比比较他克莫司从每日两次转换为每日一次时谷底水平的患者内变异性。(2)使用3种变异性指标来检验他克莫司每日一次患者内变异性与移植总衰竭(即恢复慢性透析、预防性再移植、移植功能死亡)之间的关系。设计:在这项观察性队列研究中,使用Wilcoxon配对对带符号秩检验比较他克莫司从每日两次转换为每日一次前后患者低谷水平的变异性。采用Kaplan-Meier曲线和多变量Cox比例风险模型分析移植结果。结果:在463例患者中,中位标准差、变异系数和患者内变异性百分比转换前后的患者内变异性差异分别为-0.16 (P = 0.09)、-0.01 (P = 0.52)和-1.41 (P = 0.32)。转换后,患者内变异性标准差和患者内变异性百分比每增加1个单位,变异系数每增加0.1个单位,总移植物衰竭的风险比[分别为1.19 (P = 0.004)、1.02 (P = 0.030)、1.13 (P = 0.001)]增加。转换后,使用标准差和变异系数的患者内变异性高于队列中位数,移植物总衰竭的风险明显更高。讨论:在一个项目范围内的转换中,使用三种变异性测量方法,从每日两次到每日一次的他克莫司转换后的患者内部变异性没有观察到显著差异。患者内部的高变异性与转换后的不良移植结果相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Tacrolimus Formulation, Exposure Variability, and Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Tacrolimus Formulation, Exposure Variability, and Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Tacrolimus Formulation, Exposure Variability, and Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Tacrolimus Formulation, Exposure Variability, and Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Introduction: Few studies have compared within-patient variability measures of tacrolimus trough levels by formulation and assessed within-patient variability on outcomes of kidney transplant recipients.

Research questions: (1) To compare within-patient variability of trough levels when converting from twice-daily to once-daily tacrolimus using standard deviation, coefficient of variation, and intrapatient variability percent. (2) To use the 3 measures of variability to examine the relationship between tacrolimus once-daily within-patient variability and total graft failure (i.e., return to chronic dialysis, pre-emptive retransplant, death with graft function).

Design: In this observational cohort study, within-patient variability of trough levels pre- and post-conversion from twice-daily to once-daily tacrolimus were compared using Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test. Graft outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models.

Results: In 463 patients, within-patient variability differences pre- and post-conversion of median standard deviation, coefficient of variation, and intrapatient variability percent were -0.16 (P = 0.09), -0.01 (P = 0.52), and -1.41 (P = 0.32), respectively. Post-conversion, every 1 unit increase in within-patient variability standard deviation and intrapatient variability percent and every 0.1 unit increase in the coefficient of variation was associated with an increased hazard ratio [1.19 (P = 0.004), 1.02 (P = 0.030), 1.13 (P = 0.001), respectively] of total graft failure. Post-conversion, within-patient variability above cohort medians using standard deviation and coefficient of variation had a significantly higher risk of total graft failure.

Discussion: Under a program-wide conversion, no significant difference was observed in within-patient variability post-conversion from twice-daily to once-daily tacrolimus using the three measures of variability. High within-patient variability was associated with adverse transplant outcomes post-conversion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Progress in Transplantation
Progress in Transplantation SURGERY-TRANSPLANTATION
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Progress in Transplantation (PIT) is the official journal of NATCO, The Organization for Transplant Professionals. Journal Partners include: Australasian Transplant Coordinators Association and Society for Transplant Social Workers. PIT reflects the multi-disciplinary team approach to procurement and clinical aspects of organ and tissue transplantation by providing a professional forum for exchange of the continually changing body of knowledge in transplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信