从传热方法预测输送石蜡或“含蜡”原油的管道中的蜡沉积

IF 4.8 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Anil K. Mehrotra, Samira Haj-Shafiei, Sina Ehsani
{"title":"从传热方法预测输送石蜡或“含蜡”原油的管道中的蜡沉积","authors":"Anil K. Mehrotra,&nbsp;Samira Haj-Shafiei,&nbsp;Sina Ehsani","doi":"10.1016/j.jpse.2021.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The heat-transfer mechanism for solid deposition from ‘waxy’ or paraffinic oils and mixtures has been developed and validated through several experimental and modeling investigations over the past three decades. This modeling approach considers the transient, unsteady-state wax deposition process to involve (partial) freezing with liquid-to-solid phase transformation, which has been modeled via the Stefan moving (or free) boundary problem formulation. The steady-state deposit thickness is predicted from a model that equates the heat-transfer rate in the radial direction across as many as five thermal resistances in series, including the flowing oil (convective), the deposit layer (conductive), the pipe wall (conductive), an insulation layer (conductive), and the coolant or surroundings (convective). Of these, the two predominant thermal resistances are due to convection in the flowing oil and conduction across the deposit layer. Calculation results are presented to systematically demonstrate the effect of key parameters on the steady-state deposit thickness in a pipeline carrying a paraffinic or ‘waxy’ crude oil in the hot flow regime. Numerical predictions for the deposit thickness, in the radial direction, highlight the effects of flowing oil temperature, the surrounding or coolant temperature, the heat transfer coefficient for the flowing oil, the inner radius of pipeline, the deposit average thermal conductivity, pipe-wall thermal conductivity, insulation thermal conductivity, and the wax appearance temperature of waxy oil. Also included are the predictions that demonstrate the deposit thickness does not depend directly on the overall thermal driving force or temperature difference. All parameters in the heat-transfer calculations are either measured directly or can be estimated from established predictive techniques; that is, the model does not involve any adjusted parameter.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100824,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering","volume":"1 4","pages":"Pages 428-435"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667143321000512/pdfft?md5=2b2d4cd9e49b07163608f5400d8cff9d&pid=1-s2.0-S2667143321000512-main.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictions for wax deposition in a pipeline carrying paraffinic or ‘waxy’ crude oil from the heat-transfer approach\",\"authors\":\"Anil K. Mehrotra,&nbsp;Samira Haj-Shafiei,&nbsp;Sina Ehsani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpse.2021.09.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The heat-transfer mechanism for solid deposition from ‘waxy’ or paraffinic oils and mixtures has been developed and validated through several experimental and modeling investigations over the past three decades. This modeling approach considers the transient, unsteady-state wax deposition process to involve (partial) freezing with liquid-to-solid phase transformation, which has been modeled via the Stefan moving (or free) boundary problem formulation. The steady-state deposit thickness is predicted from a model that equates the heat-transfer rate in the radial direction across as many as five thermal resistances in series, including the flowing oil (convective), the deposit layer (conductive), the pipe wall (conductive), an insulation layer (conductive), and the coolant or surroundings (convective). Of these, the two predominant thermal resistances are due to convection in the flowing oil and conduction across the deposit layer. Calculation results are presented to systematically demonstrate the effect of key parameters on the steady-state deposit thickness in a pipeline carrying a paraffinic or ‘waxy’ crude oil in the hot flow regime. Numerical predictions for the deposit thickness, in the radial direction, highlight the effects of flowing oil temperature, the surrounding or coolant temperature, the heat transfer coefficient for the flowing oil, the inner radius of pipeline, the deposit average thermal conductivity, pipe-wall thermal conductivity, insulation thermal conductivity, and the wax appearance temperature of waxy oil. Also included are the predictions that demonstrate the deposit thickness does not depend directly on the overall thermal driving force or temperature difference. All parameters in the heat-transfer calculations are either measured directly or can be estimated from established predictive techniques; that is, the model does not involve any adjusted parameter.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100824,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"1 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 428-435\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667143321000512/pdfft?md5=2b2d4cd9e49b07163608f5400d8cff9d&pid=1-s2.0-S2667143321000512-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667143321000512\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667143321000512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

在过去的三十年中,通过多次实验和模型研究,已经开发并验证了“蜡质”或石蜡油及其混合物固体沉积的传热机制。该建模方法考虑了瞬态,非稳态蜡沉积过程涉及(部分)冻结与液固相变,该过程已通过Stefan移动(或自由)边界问题公式进行建模。稳态沉积厚度是通过一个模型来预测的,该模型将径向传热速率与多达五个热阻串联在一起,包括流动的油(对流)、沉积层(导电)、管壁(导电)、绝缘层(导电)和冷却剂或周围环境(对流)。其中,两个主要的热阻是由于流动的油中的对流和沉积层中的传导。计算结果系统地说明了在热流状态下,关键参数对石蜡或含蜡原油输送管道稳态沉积厚度的影响。在径向上,对沉积物厚度的数值预测突出了流动油温度、周围或冷却剂温度、流动油的传热系数、管道内半径、沉积物平均导热系数、管壁导热系数、保温导热系数和蜡质油的成蜡温度的影响。还包括预测,证明沉积厚度不直接依赖于整体热驱动力或温差。传热计算中的所有参数要么直接测量,要么可以从已建立的预测技术中估计;也就是说,模型不涉及任何调整后的参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictions for wax deposition in a pipeline carrying paraffinic or ‘waxy’ crude oil from the heat-transfer approach

The heat-transfer mechanism for solid deposition from ‘waxy’ or paraffinic oils and mixtures has been developed and validated through several experimental and modeling investigations over the past three decades. This modeling approach considers the transient, unsteady-state wax deposition process to involve (partial) freezing with liquid-to-solid phase transformation, which has been modeled via the Stefan moving (or free) boundary problem formulation. The steady-state deposit thickness is predicted from a model that equates the heat-transfer rate in the radial direction across as many as five thermal resistances in series, including the flowing oil (convective), the deposit layer (conductive), the pipe wall (conductive), an insulation layer (conductive), and the coolant or surroundings (convective). Of these, the two predominant thermal resistances are due to convection in the flowing oil and conduction across the deposit layer. Calculation results are presented to systematically demonstrate the effect of key parameters on the steady-state deposit thickness in a pipeline carrying a paraffinic or ‘waxy’ crude oil in the hot flow regime. Numerical predictions for the deposit thickness, in the radial direction, highlight the effects of flowing oil temperature, the surrounding or coolant temperature, the heat transfer coefficient for the flowing oil, the inner radius of pipeline, the deposit average thermal conductivity, pipe-wall thermal conductivity, insulation thermal conductivity, and the wax appearance temperature of waxy oil. Also included are the predictions that demonstrate the deposit thickness does not depend directly on the overall thermal driving force or temperature difference. All parameters in the heat-transfer calculations are either measured directly or can be estimated from established predictive techniques; that is, the model does not involve any adjusted parameter.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信