超声引导下肩峰下皮质类固醇和臭氧(O2-O3)注射治疗慢性肩袖肌腱病变的比较:一项随机临床试验。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Merve Örücü Atar, Nurdan Korkmaz, Sefa Gümrük Aslan, Özge Tezen, Sinem Uyar Köylü, Yasin Demir, Serdar Kesikburun
{"title":"超声引导下肩峰下皮质类固醇和臭氧(O2-O3)注射治疗慢性肩袖肌腱病变的比较:一项随机临床试验。","authors":"Merve Örücü Atar,&nbsp;Nurdan Korkmaz,&nbsp;Sefa Gümrük Aslan,&nbsp;Özge Tezen,&nbsp;Sinem Uyar Köylü,&nbsp;Yasin Demir,&nbsp;Serdar Kesikburun","doi":"10.3344/kjp.22221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>: The authors aimed to compare the effects of a one-time ultrasound (US)-guided subacromial corticosteroid injection and three-time ozone (O<sub>2</sub>-O<sub>3</sub>) injection in patients with chronic supraspinatus tendinopathy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>: Participants were randomly assigned to the corticosteroid group (n = 22) or ozone group (n = 22). Injections in both groups were administered into subacromial bursa with an US-guided in-plane posterolateral approach. Primary outcome measure was the change in the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) score between baseline and 12-weeks post-injection. Secondary outcome measures included visual analog scale and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index scores. Assessments were recorded at baseline, and 4-weeks and 12-weeks post-injection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>: Forty participants completed this study. Based on repeated measurement analysis of variance, a significant effect of time was found for all outcome measures in both groups. Both the groups showed clinically significant improvements in shoulder pain, quality of life, and function. Baseline, 4-week post-injection, and 12-week post-injection WORC scores (mean ± standard deviation) were 57.91 ± 18.97, 39.10 ± 20.50 and 37.22 ± 27.31 in the corticosteroid group, respectively and 69.03 ± 15.89, 39.11 ± 24.36, and 32.26 ± 24.58 in the ozone group, respectively. However, no significant group × time interaction was identified regarding all outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>: Three-time ozone injection was not superior to a one-time corticosteroid injection in patients with chronic supraspinatus tendinopathy. It might be as effective as corticosteroid injection at 4-weeks and 12-weeks post-injection in terms of relieving pain and improving quality of life and function.</p>","PeriodicalId":56252,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Pain","volume":"36 1","pages":"128-136"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c1/f2/kjp-36-1-128.PMC9812695.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of ultrasound-guided subacromial corticosteroid and ozone (O<sub>2</sub>-O<sub>3</sub>) injections in the treatment of chronic rotator cuff tendinopathy: a randomized clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Merve Örücü Atar,&nbsp;Nurdan Korkmaz,&nbsp;Sefa Gümrük Aslan,&nbsp;Özge Tezen,&nbsp;Sinem Uyar Köylü,&nbsp;Yasin Demir,&nbsp;Serdar Kesikburun\",\"doi\":\"10.3344/kjp.22221\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>: The authors aimed to compare the effects of a one-time ultrasound (US)-guided subacromial corticosteroid injection and three-time ozone (O<sub>2</sub>-O<sub>3</sub>) injection in patients with chronic supraspinatus tendinopathy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>: Participants were randomly assigned to the corticosteroid group (n = 22) or ozone group (n = 22). Injections in both groups were administered into subacromial bursa with an US-guided in-plane posterolateral approach. Primary outcome measure was the change in the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) score between baseline and 12-weeks post-injection. Secondary outcome measures included visual analog scale and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index scores. Assessments were recorded at baseline, and 4-weeks and 12-weeks post-injection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>: Forty participants completed this study. Based on repeated measurement analysis of variance, a significant effect of time was found for all outcome measures in both groups. Both the groups showed clinically significant improvements in shoulder pain, quality of life, and function. Baseline, 4-week post-injection, and 12-week post-injection WORC scores (mean ± standard deviation) were 57.91 ± 18.97, 39.10 ± 20.50 and 37.22 ± 27.31 in the corticosteroid group, respectively and 69.03 ± 15.89, 39.11 ± 24.36, and 32.26 ± 24.58 in the ozone group, respectively. However, no significant group × time interaction was identified regarding all outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>: Three-time ozone injection was not superior to a one-time corticosteroid injection in patients with chronic supraspinatus tendinopathy. It might be as effective as corticosteroid injection at 4-weeks and 12-weeks post-injection in terms of relieving pain and improving quality of life and function.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56252,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Pain\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"128-136\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c1/f2/kjp-36-1-128.PMC9812695.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.22221\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.22221","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:作者旨在比较一次超声(US)引导下肩峰下皮质类固醇注射和三次臭氧(O2-O3)注射对慢性冈上肌腱病变患者的效果。方法:将参与者随机分为皮质类固醇组(n = 22)和臭氧组(n = 22)。两组均采用us引导平面内后外侧入路将注射注入肩峰下囊。主要结局指标是西安大略省旋转袖指数(WORC)评分在基线和注射后12周之间的变化。次要结果测量包括视觉模拟量表和肩部疼痛和残疾指数评分。在基线、注射后4周和12周记录评估。结果:40名参与者完成了本研究。基于重复测量方差分析,两组的所有结果测量均发现时间的显著影响。两组患者的肩痛、生活质量和功能均有显著改善。皮质类固醇组基线、注射后4周、12周WORC评分(平均±标准差)分别为57.91±18.97、39.10±20.50、37.22±27.31,臭氧组分别为69.03±15.89、39.11±24.36、32.26±24.58。然而,在所有结果测量中,没有发现显著的组间相互作用。结论:对于慢性冈上肌腱病变患者,三次臭氧注射并不优于一次性皮质类固醇注射。在缓解疼痛、改善生活质量和功能方面,它可能与注射后4周和12周的皮质类固醇注射一样有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparison of ultrasound-guided subacromial corticosteroid and ozone (O<sub>2</sub>-O<sub>3</sub>) injections in the treatment of chronic rotator cuff tendinopathy: a randomized clinical trial.

Comparison of ultrasound-guided subacromial corticosteroid and ozone (O<sub>2</sub>-O<sub>3</sub>) injections in the treatment of chronic rotator cuff tendinopathy: a randomized clinical trial.

Comparison of ultrasound-guided subacromial corticosteroid and ozone (O<sub>2</sub>-O<sub>3</sub>) injections in the treatment of chronic rotator cuff tendinopathy: a randomized clinical trial.

Comparison of ultrasound-guided subacromial corticosteroid and ozone (O2-O3) injections in the treatment of chronic rotator cuff tendinopathy: a randomized clinical trial.

Background: : The authors aimed to compare the effects of a one-time ultrasound (US)-guided subacromial corticosteroid injection and three-time ozone (O2-O3) injection in patients with chronic supraspinatus tendinopathy.

Methods: : Participants were randomly assigned to the corticosteroid group (n = 22) or ozone group (n = 22). Injections in both groups were administered into subacromial bursa with an US-guided in-plane posterolateral approach. Primary outcome measure was the change in the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) score between baseline and 12-weeks post-injection. Secondary outcome measures included visual analog scale and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index scores. Assessments were recorded at baseline, and 4-weeks and 12-weeks post-injection.

Results: : Forty participants completed this study. Based on repeated measurement analysis of variance, a significant effect of time was found for all outcome measures in both groups. Both the groups showed clinically significant improvements in shoulder pain, quality of life, and function. Baseline, 4-week post-injection, and 12-week post-injection WORC scores (mean ± standard deviation) were 57.91 ± 18.97, 39.10 ± 20.50 and 37.22 ± 27.31 in the corticosteroid group, respectively and 69.03 ± 15.89, 39.11 ± 24.36, and 32.26 ± 24.58 in the ozone group, respectively. However, no significant group × time interaction was identified regarding all outcome measures.

Conclusions: : Three-time ozone injection was not superior to a one-time corticosteroid injection in patients with chronic supraspinatus tendinopathy. It might be as effective as corticosteroid injection at 4-weeks and 12-weeks post-injection in terms of relieving pain and improving quality of life and function.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Pain
Korean Journal of Pain Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Korean Journal of Pain (Korean J Pain, KJP) is the official journal of the Korean Pain Society, founded in 1986. It has been published since 1988. It publishes peer reviewed original articles related to all aspects of pain, including clinical and basic research, patient care, education, and health policy. It has been published quarterly in English since 2009 (on the first day of January, April, July, and October). In addition, it has also become the official journal of the International Spinal Pain Society since 2016. The mission of the Journal is to improve the care of patients in pain by providing a forum for clinical researchers, basic scientists, clinicians, and other health professionals. The circulation number per issue is 50.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信