在文献荟萃分析中使用扎根理论提取、编码和分析数据

Q2 Nursing
A. S. Rêgo, Cremilde Aparecida Trindade Radovanovic, M. C. Haddad, José Luís Guedes dos Santos, Lígia Carreira, M. A. Salci, Luciano de Andrade, A. Büscher
{"title":"在文献荟萃分析中使用扎根理论提取、编码和分析数据","authors":"A. S. Rêgo, Cremilde Aparecida Trindade Radovanovic, M. C. Haddad, José Luís Guedes dos Santos, Lígia Carreira, M. A. Salci, Luciano de Andrade, A. Büscher","doi":"10.1590/1980-265x-tce-2021-0445en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective: to describe the conduction of data extraction, analysis and codification using the Straussian perspective of Grounded Theory, in Literature Meta-analysis. Method: this is a theoretical-reflexive study on the data extraction from reviews with meta-anaylses. To design the process of searching for qualitative studies, this study briefly addresses the sequential steps of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses and the Joanna Briggs Institute. The extraction, analysis and codification process were carried out following the assumptions of grounded theory, with the Straussian perspective. They are the theoretical-methodological bases in the first stages of the guidelines of the literature review and Meta-analyses guides, starting with the research question until reaching the review stages, divided into identification, selection, eligibility, and inclusion. Results: the results describe the process of data extraction, analysis and codification from the Straussian perspective, using comparative analysis of data, memoranda, diagrams and possibilities of new sample groups from the detailed analytical reading of the included studies. Finally, theoretical saturation is performed, with an analysis of the findings, with examples of categories and subcategories, the emergence of the central phenomenon and presentation of the paradigmatic model. Conclusion: the essay presents subsidies for the understanding of the conduction of extraction, analysis and codification of data in meta-analyses based on the Straussian perspective, enabling the systematized analysis of qualitative evidence and contributing to the development of models or theories of conceptual character","PeriodicalId":51188,"journal":{"name":"Texto Contexto Enfermagem","volume":"93 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"USE OF GROUNDED THEORY IN THE EXTRACTION, CODING AND ANALYSIS OF DATA IN LITERATURE META-ANALYSES\",\"authors\":\"A. S. Rêgo, Cremilde Aparecida Trindade Radovanovic, M. C. Haddad, José Luís Guedes dos Santos, Lígia Carreira, M. A. Salci, Luciano de Andrade, A. Büscher\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1980-265x-tce-2021-0445en\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Objective: to describe the conduction of data extraction, analysis and codification using the Straussian perspective of Grounded Theory, in Literature Meta-analysis. Method: this is a theoretical-reflexive study on the data extraction from reviews with meta-anaylses. To design the process of searching for qualitative studies, this study briefly addresses the sequential steps of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses and the Joanna Briggs Institute. The extraction, analysis and codification process were carried out following the assumptions of grounded theory, with the Straussian perspective. They are the theoretical-methodological bases in the first stages of the guidelines of the literature review and Meta-analyses guides, starting with the research question until reaching the review stages, divided into identification, selection, eligibility, and inclusion. Results: the results describe the process of data extraction, analysis and codification from the Straussian perspective, using comparative analysis of data, memoranda, diagrams and possibilities of new sample groups from the detailed analytical reading of the included studies. Finally, theoretical saturation is performed, with an analysis of the findings, with examples of categories and subcategories, the emergence of the central phenomenon and presentation of the paradigmatic model. Conclusion: the essay presents subsidies for the understanding of the conduction of extraction, analysis and codification of data in meta-analyses based on the Straussian perspective, enabling the systematized analysis of qualitative evidence and contributing to the development of models or theories of conceptual character\",\"PeriodicalId\":51188,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Texto Contexto Enfermagem\",\"volume\":\"93 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Texto Contexto Enfermagem\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-265x-tce-2021-0445en\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Texto Contexto Enfermagem","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-265x-tce-2021-0445en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要目的:探讨在文献荟萃分析中运用扎根理论的施特劳斯视角进行数据提取、分析和整理的过程。方法:对meta分析综述的数据提取进行理论反思性研究。为了设计寻找定性研究的过程,本研究简要介绍了系统评价和元分析以及乔安娜布里格斯研究所的首选报告项目的顺序步骤。提取、分析和整理过程是在扎根理论的假设下,以施特劳斯的观点进行的。它们是文献综述和荟萃分析指南第一阶段的理论方法基础,从研究问题开始,直到进入综述阶段,分为识别、选择、合格和纳入。结果:通过对纳入研究的详细分析阅读,对数据、备忘录、图表和新样本组的可能性进行比较分析,从施特劳斯的角度描述了数据提取、分析和编纂的过程。最后,通过对研究结果的分析、类别和子类别的例子、中心现象的出现和范式模型的呈现,进行理论饱和。结论:本文为理解基于施特劳斯观点的元分析中数据的提取、分析和编纂的传导提供了补贴,使定性证据的系统化分析成为可能,并有助于概念特征模型或理论的发展
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
USE OF GROUNDED THEORY IN THE EXTRACTION, CODING AND ANALYSIS OF DATA IN LITERATURE META-ANALYSES
ABSTRACT Objective: to describe the conduction of data extraction, analysis and codification using the Straussian perspective of Grounded Theory, in Literature Meta-analysis. Method: this is a theoretical-reflexive study on the data extraction from reviews with meta-anaylses. To design the process of searching for qualitative studies, this study briefly addresses the sequential steps of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses and the Joanna Briggs Institute. The extraction, analysis and codification process were carried out following the assumptions of grounded theory, with the Straussian perspective. They are the theoretical-methodological bases in the first stages of the guidelines of the literature review and Meta-analyses guides, starting with the research question until reaching the review stages, divided into identification, selection, eligibility, and inclusion. Results: the results describe the process of data extraction, analysis and codification from the Straussian perspective, using comparative analysis of data, memoranda, diagrams and possibilities of new sample groups from the detailed analytical reading of the included studies. Finally, theoretical saturation is performed, with an analysis of the findings, with examples of categories and subcategories, the emergence of the central phenomenon and presentation of the paradigmatic model. Conclusion: the essay presents subsidies for the understanding of the conduction of extraction, analysis and codification of data in meta-analyses based on the Straussian perspective, enabling the systematized analysis of qualitative evidence and contributing to the development of models or theories of conceptual character
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Texto Contexto Enfermagem
Texto Contexto Enfermagem Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Texto & Contexto Enfermagem provides space for reflection and deepening of knowledge about issues of practice, teaching and research in health and nursing, at national and international levels. The journal is published quarterly in the rolling pass or Continuous flow mode, accepting manuscripts in Portuguese, English or Spanish, in the categories original article, reflection, experience report and review. Contributions designated to the dissemination of unpublished original research results are prioritized for publication. Special issues are published at the discretion of the Board of Directors and Associate Editors. All manuscripts are published in two versions, one of which is English, aiming to cover the largest number of readers worldwide. The editorial policy of Texto & Contexto Enfermagem is based on rigorous quality criteria for indexing and publishing (including technical and normative aspects, graphic and textual quality and excellence in scientific content); on responsibility for shared management between the Board of Directors, Editorial Board and Internal and External Editors Associates; and on the rigorous and constructive peer review, preserving the anonymity of authors and reviewers (double blinded).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信