Yosef Dastagirzada, Carolina Benjamin, Julia Bevilacqua, Jason Gurewitz, Chandra Sen, John G Golfinos, Dimitris Placantonakis, Jafar J Jafar, Seth Lieberman, Rich Lebowitz, Ariane Lewis, Donato Pacione
{"title":"内镜鼻内颅底手术术后预防性抗生素的停用。","authors":"Yosef Dastagirzada, Carolina Benjamin, Julia Bevilacqua, Jason Gurewitz, Chandra Sen, John G Golfinos, Dimitris Placantonakis, Jafar J Jafar, Seth Lieberman, Rich Lebowitz, Ariane Lewis, Donato Pacione","doi":"10.1055/a-1771-0372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b> Postoperative prophylactic antibiotic usage for endoscopic skull base surgery varies based on the institution as evidence-based guidelines are lacking. The purpose of this study is to determine whether discontinuing postoperative prophylactic antibiotics in endoscopic endonasal cases led to a difference in central nervous system (CNS) infections, multi-drug resistant organism (MDRO) infections, or other postoperative infections. <b>Methods</b> This quality improvement study compared outcomes between a retrospective cohort (from September 2013 to March 2019) and a prospective cohort (April 2019 to June 2019) after adopting a protocol to discontinue prophylactic postoperative antibiotics in patients who underwent endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEAs). Our primary end points of the study included the presence of postoperative CNS infection, <i>Clostridium difficile</i> ( <i>C. diff</i> ), and MDRO infections. <b>Results</b> A total of 388 patients were analyzed, 313 in the pre-protocol group and 75 in the post-protocol group. There were similar rates of intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak (56.9 vs. 61.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.946). There was a statistically significant decrease in the proportion of patients receiving IV antibiotics during their postoperative course ( <i>p</i> = 0.001) and those discharged on antibiotics ( <i>p</i> = 0.001). There was no significant increase in the rate of CNS infections in the post-protocol group despite the discontinuation of postoperative antibiotics (3.5 vs. 2.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.714). There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative <i>C. diff</i> (0 vs. 0%, <i>p</i> = 0.488) or development of MDRO infections (0.3 vs 0%, <i>p</i> = 0.624). <b>Conclusion</b> Discontinuation of postoperative antibiotics after EEA at our institution did not change the frequency of CNS infections. It appears that discontinuation of antibiotics after EEA is safe.</p>","PeriodicalId":16513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base","volume":"84 2","pages":"157-163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9991524/pdf/10-1055-a-1771-0372.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discontinuation of Postoperative Prophylactic Antibiotics for Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Yosef Dastagirzada, Carolina Benjamin, Julia Bevilacqua, Jason Gurewitz, Chandra Sen, John G Golfinos, Dimitris Placantonakis, Jafar J Jafar, Seth Lieberman, Rich Lebowitz, Ariane Lewis, Donato Pacione\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-1771-0372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b> Postoperative prophylactic antibiotic usage for endoscopic skull base surgery varies based on the institution as evidence-based guidelines are lacking. The purpose of this study is to determine whether discontinuing postoperative prophylactic antibiotics in endoscopic endonasal cases led to a difference in central nervous system (CNS) infections, multi-drug resistant organism (MDRO) infections, or other postoperative infections. <b>Methods</b> This quality improvement study compared outcomes between a retrospective cohort (from September 2013 to March 2019) and a prospective cohort (April 2019 to June 2019) after adopting a protocol to discontinue prophylactic postoperative antibiotics in patients who underwent endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEAs). Our primary end points of the study included the presence of postoperative CNS infection, <i>Clostridium difficile</i> ( <i>C. diff</i> ), and MDRO infections. <b>Results</b> A total of 388 patients were analyzed, 313 in the pre-protocol group and 75 in the post-protocol group. There were similar rates of intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak (56.9 vs. 61.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.946). There was a statistically significant decrease in the proportion of patients receiving IV antibiotics during their postoperative course ( <i>p</i> = 0.001) and those discharged on antibiotics ( <i>p</i> = 0.001). There was no significant increase in the rate of CNS infections in the post-protocol group despite the discontinuation of postoperative antibiotics (3.5 vs. 2.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.714). There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative <i>C. diff</i> (0 vs. 0%, <i>p</i> = 0.488) or development of MDRO infections (0.3 vs 0%, <i>p</i> = 0.624). <b>Conclusion</b> Discontinuation of postoperative antibiotics after EEA at our institution did not change the frequency of CNS infections. It appears that discontinuation of antibiotics after EEA is safe.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base\",\"volume\":\"84 2\",\"pages\":\"157-163\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9991524/pdf/10-1055-a-1771-0372.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1771-0372\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1771-0372","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:由于缺乏循证指南,内镜颅底手术术后预防性抗生素的使用因机构而异。本研究的目的是确定内镜下鼻内病例术后停用预防性抗生素是否会导致中枢神经系统(CNS)感染、多药耐药菌(MDRO)感染或其他术后感染的差异。方法:本质量改进研究比较了回顾性队列(2013年9月至2019年3月)和前瞻性队列(2019年4月至2019年6月)在采用内镜内鼻入路(EEAs)患者停用预防性术后抗生素方案后的结果。我们研究的主要终点包括术后中枢神经系统感染、艰难梭菌(C. diff)和MDRO感染。结果共分析388例患者,其中方案前组313例,方案后组75例。术中脑脊液漏率相似(56.9% vs. 61.3%, p = 0.946)。术后静脉注射抗生素的患者比例(p = 0.001)和出院时使用抗生素的患者比例(p = 0.001)均有统计学意义的下降。尽管术后停用抗生素,方案后组的中枢神经系统感染率没有显著增加(3.5% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.714)。术后C. diff发生率(0比0%,p = 0.488)和MDRO感染发生率(0.3比0%,p = 0.624)差异无统计学意义。结论我院EEA术后停用抗生素未改变中枢神经系统感染的发生频率。在EEA后停用抗生素似乎是安全的。
Discontinuation of Postoperative Prophylactic Antibiotics for Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery.
Background Postoperative prophylactic antibiotic usage for endoscopic skull base surgery varies based on the institution as evidence-based guidelines are lacking. The purpose of this study is to determine whether discontinuing postoperative prophylactic antibiotics in endoscopic endonasal cases led to a difference in central nervous system (CNS) infections, multi-drug resistant organism (MDRO) infections, or other postoperative infections. Methods This quality improvement study compared outcomes between a retrospective cohort (from September 2013 to March 2019) and a prospective cohort (April 2019 to June 2019) after adopting a protocol to discontinue prophylactic postoperative antibiotics in patients who underwent endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEAs). Our primary end points of the study included the presence of postoperative CNS infection, Clostridium difficile ( C. diff ), and MDRO infections. Results A total of 388 patients were analyzed, 313 in the pre-protocol group and 75 in the post-protocol group. There were similar rates of intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak (56.9 vs. 61.3%, p = 0.946). There was a statistically significant decrease in the proportion of patients receiving IV antibiotics during their postoperative course ( p = 0.001) and those discharged on antibiotics ( p = 0.001). There was no significant increase in the rate of CNS infections in the post-protocol group despite the discontinuation of postoperative antibiotics (3.5 vs. 2.7%, p = 0.714). There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative C. diff (0 vs. 0%, p = 0.488) or development of MDRO infections (0.3 vs 0%, p = 0.624). Conclusion Discontinuation of postoperative antibiotics after EEA at our institution did not change the frequency of CNS infections. It appears that discontinuation of antibiotics after EEA is safe.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base (JNLS B) is a major publication from the world''s leading publisher in neurosurgery. JNLS B currently serves as the official organ of several national and international neurosurgery and skull base societies.
JNLS B is a peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles, and technical notes covering all aspects of neurological surgery. The focus of JNLS B includes microsurgery as well as the latest minimally invasive techniques, such as stereotactic-guided surgery, endoscopy, and endovascular procedures. JNLS B is devoted to the techniques and procedures of skull base surgery.