皮褶卡尺与超声成像在娱乐活动学生身体成分评估中的比较

K. Nolte, R. V. D. Merwe, Cindy A. Helena, H. Nolte, J. V. D. Meulen
{"title":"皮褶卡尺与超声成像在娱乐活动学生身体成分评估中的比较","authors":"K. Nolte, R. V. D. Merwe, Cindy A. Helena, H. Nolte, J. V. D. Meulen","doi":"10.4314/ESA.V28I1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The measurement of skinfold thickness by means of skinfold callipers (SC) is a widely accepted method to assess subcutaneous fat thickness and percentage body fat (%BF). Ultrasound imaging (USI) is a more recent technology that is becoming accessible for the same application. The objective of this study was to compare measurements recorded by SC and USI for the assessment of subcutaneous fat thickness in order to estimate %BF. Thirty adults volunteered for the study. Body mass, stature and subcutaneous fat thickness for seven sites were measured. Strong (p 0.05) difference between the %BF determined by the two methods (SC=19.5±6.4 %BF and USI = 19.0±6.3 %BF). However, levels of agreement indicated that the USI could over- or underestimate %BF by ±10%. This resulted in %BF estimation errors which are deemed too large from a clinical perspective. Additional studies are recommended to investigate the lack of agreement and bias highlighted between the two methods.","PeriodicalId":64555,"journal":{"name":"人类工效学","volume":"65 1","pages":"12-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison between skinfold callipers and ultrasound imaging for assessing body composition in recreationally active students\",\"authors\":\"K. Nolte, R. V. D. Merwe, Cindy A. Helena, H. Nolte, J. V. D. Meulen\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/ESA.V28I1.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The measurement of skinfold thickness by means of skinfold callipers (SC) is a widely accepted method to assess subcutaneous fat thickness and percentage body fat (%BF). Ultrasound imaging (USI) is a more recent technology that is becoming accessible for the same application. The objective of this study was to compare measurements recorded by SC and USI for the assessment of subcutaneous fat thickness in order to estimate %BF. Thirty adults volunteered for the study. Body mass, stature and subcutaneous fat thickness for seven sites were measured. Strong (p 0.05) difference between the %BF determined by the two methods (SC=19.5±6.4 %BF and USI = 19.0±6.3 %BF). However, levels of agreement indicated that the USI could over- or underestimate %BF by ±10%. This resulted in %BF estimation errors which are deemed too large from a clinical perspective. Additional studies are recommended to investigate the lack of agreement and bias highlighted between the two methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":64555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"人类工效学\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"12-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"人类工效学\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/ESA.V28I1.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"人类工效学","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/ESA.V28I1.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

用皮褶卡尺(SC)测量皮褶厚度是一种被广泛接受的评估皮下脂肪厚度和体脂百分比(%BF)的方法。超声成像(USI)是一项较新的技术,可用于相同的应用。本研究的目的是比较SC和USI记录的评估皮下脂肪厚度的测量结果,以估计BF %。30名成年人自愿参加了这项研究。测量了7个部位的体重、身高和皮下脂肪厚度。两种方法测定的%BF (SC=19.5±6.4% BF, USI = 19.0±6.3% BF)差异显著(p < 0.05)。然而,一致的水平表明,USI可能高估或低估%BF±10%。这导致了%BF估计误差,从临床角度来看,这被认为太大了。建议进行更多的研究,以调查两种方法之间缺乏一致性和突出的偏倚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparison between skinfold callipers and ultrasound imaging for assessing body composition in recreationally active students
The measurement of skinfold thickness by means of skinfold callipers (SC) is a widely accepted method to assess subcutaneous fat thickness and percentage body fat (%BF). Ultrasound imaging (USI) is a more recent technology that is becoming accessible for the same application. The objective of this study was to compare measurements recorded by SC and USI for the assessment of subcutaneous fat thickness in order to estimate %BF. Thirty adults volunteered for the study. Body mass, stature and subcutaneous fat thickness for seven sites were measured. Strong (p 0.05) difference between the %BF determined by the two methods (SC=19.5±6.4 %BF and USI = 19.0±6.3 %BF). However, levels of agreement indicated that the USI could over- or underestimate %BF by ±10%. This resulted in %BF estimation errors which are deemed too large from a clinical perspective. Additional studies are recommended to investigate the lack of agreement and bias highlighted between the two methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2444
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信