铁同位素作为矿流体示踪剂——以辽宁青城子Pb - Zn - Au(‐Ag)矿田为例

IF 1.1 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOLOGY
Resource Geology Pub Date : 2021-06-17 DOI:10.1111/rge.12261
Dedong Li, Yuwang Wang, Jingbin Wang, Chunkit Lai, J. Qiu, Wei Wang, Shenghui Li, Zhichao Zhang
{"title":"铁同位素作为矿流体示踪剂——以辽宁青城子Pb - Zn - Au(‐Ag)矿田为例","authors":"Dedong Li, Yuwang Wang, Jingbin Wang, Chunkit Lai, J. Qiu, Wei Wang, Shenghui Li, Zhichao Zhang","doi":"10.1111/rge.12261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Qingchengzi Pb‐Zn‐Au (‐Ag) orefield (eastern Liaoning province, NE China) is located in the northeastern margin of the North China Craton. The unconventional Fe isotopes of pyrites were analyzed to unravel the ore‐material source and migration pathway of the ore fluids. Pyrite samples of ores and wallrocks from various deposits in the orefield were collected and the solutions were analyzed by MC‐ICP‐MS. The results show that most pyrite samples contain heavier Fe isotopes than the international pyrite standard IRMM‐014. Within a particular deposit, Fe isotopes become lighter with depth. For example, the pyrite δ56Fe values drop from 0.216 ~ 0.408‰ (150‐m level) to −0.284 to −0.132‰ (210‐m level) at the Zhenzigou deposit. Gold deposits in the orefield also have similar features: At Baiyun (Huangdianzi), the pyrite δ56Fe values (0.394 ~ 0.627‰) of the silicic‐/potassic‐altered rock‐type ore (130‐m level) are significantly higher than that (0.359‰) of the quartz vein‐type ore (440‐m level). The lamprophyre δ56Fe values from different deposits are largely similar (0.040 ~ 0.024‰), whereas those in the wallrocks vary considerably (0.144 ~ 1.238‰). Compiling the pyrite δ56Fe values from many important sedimentary/metamorphic rock units in the region and magmatic‐hydrothermal deposits around the world, we concluded that the Qingchengzi Pb‐Zn‐Au(‐Ag) deposits belong to intrusion‐related magmatic‐hydrothermal type. The spatial fluid isotope variation pattern, and the fact that early‐formed sulfides have lighter isotopes than later ones, suggest that the Qingchengzi ore fluids may have originated from Zhenzigou‐Diannan (hydrothermal center) and outflown to Xiaotongjiapuzi, Gujiapuzi‐Baiyun and Erdao‐Xiquegou areas. The spatial fluid isotope variation pattern also suggests another possible hydrothermal center at Baiyun‐Gujiapuzi. The ability to identify hydrothermal center(s) and delineate fluid migration pathways suggests that pyrite Fe isotopes can serve as a tool for precious and base metals prospecting.","PeriodicalId":21089,"journal":{"name":"Resource Geology","volume":"7 1","pages":"283 - 295"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Iron isotopes as an ore‐fluid tracer: Case study of Qingchengzi Pb‐Zn‐Au(‐Ag) orefield in Liaoning, NE China\",\"authors\":\"Dedong Li, Yuwang Wang, Jingbin Wang, Chunkit Lai, J. Qiu, Wei Wang, Shenghui Li, Zhichao Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/rge.12261\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Qingchengzi Pb‐Zn‐Au (‐Ag) orefield (eastern Liaoning province, NE China) is located in the northeastern margin of the North China Craton. The unconventional Fe isotopes of pyrites were analyzed to unravel the ore‐material source and migration pathway of the ore fluids. Pyrite samples of ores and wallrocks from various deposits in the orefield were collected and the solutions were analyzed by MC‐ICP‐MS. The results show that most pyrite samples contain heavier Fe isotopes than the international pyrite standard IRMM‐014. Within a particular deposit, Fe isotopes become lighter with depth. For example, the pyrite δ56Fe values drop from 0.216 ~ 0.408‰ (150‐m level) to −0.284 to −0.132‰ (210‐m level) at the Zhenzigou deposit. Gold deposits in the orefield also have similar features: At Baiyun (Huangdianzi), the pyrite δ56Fe values (0.394 ~ 0.627‰) of the silicic‐/potassic‐altered rock‐type ore (130‐m level) are significantly higher than that (0.359‰) of the quartz vein‐type ore (440‐m level). The lamprophyre δ56Fe values from different deposits are largely similar (0.040 ~ 0.024‰), whereas those in the wallrocks vary considerably (0.144 ~ 1.238‰). Compiling the pyrite δ56Fe values from many important sedimentary/metamorphic rock units in the region and magmatic‐hydrothermal deposits around the world, we concluded that the Qingchengzi Pb‐Zn‐Au(‐Ag) deposits belong to intrusion‐related magmatic‐hydrothermal type. The spatial fluid isotope variation pattern, and the fact that early‐formed sulfides have lighter isotopes than later ones, suggest that the Qingchengzi ore fluids may have originated from Zhenzigou‐Diannan (hydrothermal center) and outflown to Xiaotongjiapuzi, Gujiapuzi‐Baiyun and Erdao‐Xiquegou areas. The spatial fluid isotope variation pattern also suggests another possible hydrothermal center at Baiyun‐Gujiapuzi. The ability to identify hydrothermal center(s) and delineate fluid migration pathways suggests that pyrite Fe isotopes can serve as a tool for precious and base metals prospecting.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resource Geology\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"283 - 295\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resource Geology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/rge.12261\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resource Geology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/rge.12261","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

青城子Pb - Zn - Au (- Ag)矿田位于华北克拉通东北缘。通过对黄铁矿非常规铁同位素的分析,揭示了黄铁矿的矿物来源和矿流体的运移途径。采集了矿区不同矿床的矿石和围岩的黄铁矿样品,并用MC - ICP - MS对溶液进行了分析。结果表明,大多数黄铁矿样品含有比国际黄铁矿标准IRMM‐014更重的铁同位素。在一个特定的矿床中,铁同位素随着深度的增加而变轻。例如,镇子沟矿床黄铁矿δ56Fe值从0.216 ~ 0.408‰(150‐m水平)降至- 0.284 ~ - 0.132‰(210‐m水平)。矿区金矿床也具有相似的特征:在白云(黄店子),硅/钾蚀变岩型矿石(130‐m)的黄铁矿δ56Fe值(0.394 ~ 0.627‰)显著高于石英脉型矿石(440‐m)的黄铁矿δ56Fe值(0.359‰)。不同矿床的煌斑岩δ56Fe值基本相似(0.040 ~ 0.024‰),而围岩的δ56Fe值差异较大(0.144 ~ 1.238‰)。综合该区许多重要的沉积/变质岩单元及世界各地岩浆热液矿床的黄铁矿δ56Fe值,认为青城子Pb - Zn - Au(- Ag)矿床属于侵入岩浆热液型。流体同位素空间变化模式及早期形成的硫化物比晚期形成的硫化物同位素轻的特征表明,青城子矿流体可能起源于镇子沟—滇南(热液中心),并流出至小通家铺子、古家铺子—白云和二道—西渠沟地区。空间流体同位素变化模式也提示白云—古家埔子可能存在另一个热液中心。热液中心的识别和流体运移路径的描绘表明,黄铁矿铁同位素可作为贵金属和贱金属找矿的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Iron isotopes as an ore‐fluid tracer: Case study of Qingchengzi Pb‐Zn‐Au(‐Ag) orefield in Liaoning, NE China

Iron isotopes as an ore‐fluid tracer: Case study of Qingchengzi Pb‐Zn‐Au(‐Ag) orefield in Liaoning, NE China
The Qingchengzi Pb‐Zn‐Au (‐Ag) orefield (eastern Liaoning province, NE China) is located in the northeastern margin of the North China Craton. The unconventional Fe isotopes of pyrites were analyzed to unravel the ore‐material source and migration pathway of the ore fluids. Pyrite samples of ores and wallrocks from various deposits in the orefield were collected and the solutions were analyzed by MC‐ICP‐MS. The results show that most pyrite samples contain heavier Fe isotopes than the international pyrite standard IRMM‐014. Within a particular deposit, Fe isotopes become lighter with depth. For example, the pyrite δ56Fe values drop from 0.216 ~ 0.408‰ (150‐m level) to −0.284 to −0.132‰ (210‐m level) at the Zhenzigou deposit. Gold deposits in the orefield also have similar features: At Baiyun (Huangdianzi), the pyrite δ56Fe values (0.394 ~ 0.627‰) of the silicic‐/potassic‐altered rock‐type ore (130‐m level) are significantly higher than that (0.359‰) of the quartz vein‐type ore (440‐m level). The lamprophyre δ56Fe values from different deposits are largely similar (0.040 ~ 0.024‰), whereas those in the wallrocks vary considerably (0.144 ~ 1.238‰). Compiling the pyrite δ56Fe values from many important sedimentary/metamorphic rock units in the region and magmatic‐hydrothermal deposits around the world, we concluded that the Qingchengzi Pb‐Zn‐Au(‐Ag) deposits belong to intrusion‐related magmatic‐hydrothermal type. The spatial fluid isotope variation pattern, and the fact that early‐formed sulfides have lighter isotopes than later ones, suggest that the Qingchengzi ore fluids may have originated from Zhenzigou‐Diannan (hydrothermal center) and outflown to Xiaotongjiapuzi, Gujiapuzi‐Baiyun and Erdao‐Xiquegou areas. The spatial fluid isotope variation pattern also suggests another possible hydrothermal center at Baiyun‐Gujiapuzi. The ability to identify hydrothermal center(s) and delineate fluid migration pathways suggests that pyrite Fe isotopes can serve as a tool for precious and base metals prospecting.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resource Geology
Resource Geology 地学-地质学
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
18
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Resource Geology is an international journal focusing on economic geology, geochemistry and environmental geology. Its purpose is to contribute to the promotion of earth sciences related to metallic and non-metallic mineral deposits mainly in Asia, Oceania and the Circum-Pacific region, although other parts of the world are also considered. Launched in 1998 by the Society for Resource Geology, the journal is published quarterly in English, making it more accessible to the international geological community. The journal publishes high quality papers of interest to those engaged in research and exploration of mineral deposits.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信