骨髓活检脱钙方法对组织病理学检查的影响分析

J. Park, K. Han
{"title":"骨髓活检脱钙方法对组织病理学检查的影响分析","authors":"J. Park, K. Han","doi":"10.15324/KJCLS.2016.48.4.371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Decalcification is routinely performed to obtain a pathological diagnosis using bone marrow biopsy. During the decalcification process using a conventional acidic solution, such as HCl, the antigenicity of tissue is damaged. Especially DNA and RNA in the bone marrow are impaired. Hence, there is the need for a standardized decalcification protocol that preserves the antigenicity of tissue. To this end, we compared the effects of two commonly used decalcifiers: Commercial decalcifier (Calcl-Clear Rapid, HCl) and the EDTA (12.5%, pH 7.0). Bone marrow biopsies sampled from 71 patients were decalcified in accordance with the protocols of respective groups—HCI versus EDTA. The differences of decalcification protocols were analyzed with respect to Hematoxylin & Eosin staining, Gomori’sreticulum staining, and immunohistochemical staining and molecular analysis. Immunohistochemical staining used Ki-67, CD20 and CD138 as primary antibodies and molecular analysis was conducted through the DNA concentration analysis, in situ hybridization (ISH) and immunoglobulin heavy chain (IGH) gene rearrangement. On the routine histopathology analysis, there was no difference between HCl and EDTA. Moreover, in case of immunohistochemical staining, the cytoplasmic membrane or cytoplasmic CD markers was well preserved. However, nuclear proteins, such as Ki-67, were stained with low quality. Conversely, according to the molecular analysis, the EDTA protocol preserved the DNA and RNA compared with the HCI. The differences of DNA quantity and quality were statistically significant between protocols of HCl and EDTA. We used 38 cases in HCl and 12 cases in EDTA. Consequently, the EDTA protocol maintains the antigenicity of the protein on tissue and is acceptable for examination with molecular base analysis. Decalcification of bone marrow biopsy by EDTA is highly recommended for the examination of immunohistochemical staining and molecular analysis.","PeriodicalId":10080,"journal":{"name":"临床检验杂志","volume":"9 1","pages":"371-377"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of the Effects of Bone Marrow Biopsy Decalcification Methods on Histopathological Examination\",\"authors\":\"J. Park, K. Han\",\"doi\":\"10.15324/KJCLS.2016.48.4.371\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Decalcification is routinely performed to obtain a pathological diagnosis using bone marrow biopsy. During the decalcification process using a conventional acidic solution, such as HCl, the antigenicity of tissue is damaged. Especially DNA and RNA in the bone marrow are impaired. Hence, there is the need for a standardized decalcification protocol that preserves the antigenicity of tissue. To this end, we compared the effects of two commonly used decalcifiers: Commercial decalcifier (Calcl-Clear Rapid, HCl) and the EDTA (12.5%, pH 7.0). Bone marrow biopsies sampled from 71 patients were decalcified in accordance with the protocols of respective groups—HCI versus EDTA. The differences of decalcification protocols were analyzed with respect to Hematoxylin & Eosin staining, Gomori’sreticulum staining, and immunohistochemical staining and molecular analysis. Immunohistochemical staining used Ki-67, CD20 and CD138 as primary antibodies and molecular analysis was conducted through the DNA concentration analysis, in situ hybridization (ISH) and immunoglobulin heavy chain (IGH) gene rearrangement. On the routine histopathology analysis, there was no difference between HCl and EDTA. Moreover, in case of immunohistochemical staining, the cytoplasmic membrane or cytoplasmic CD markers was well preserved. However, nuclear proteins, such as Ki-67, were stained with low quality. Conversely, according to the molecular analysis, the EDTA protocol preserved the DNA and RNA compared with the HCI. The differences of DNA quantity and quality were statistically significant between protocols of HCl and EDTA. We used 38 cases in HCl and 12 cases in EDTA. Consequently, the EDTA protocol maintains the antigenicity of the protein on tissue and is acceptable for examination with molecular base analysis. Decalcification of bone marrow biopsy by EDTA is highly recommended for the examination of immunohistochemical staining and molecular analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10080,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"临床检验杂志\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"371-377\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"临床检验杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15324/KJCLS.2016.48.4.371\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"临床检验杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15324/KJCLS.2016.48.4.371","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

脱钙通常用于骨髓活检以获得病理诊断。在使用常规酸性溶液(如盐酸)进行脱钙过程中,组织的抗原性被破坏。尤其是骨髓中的DNA和RNA受损。因此,需要一种标准化的脱钙方案,以保持组织的抗原性。为此,我们比较了两种常用脱钙剂的效果:商用脱钙剂(钙清快速,HCl)和EDTA (12.5%, pH 7.0)。根据hci组和EDTA组各自的方案,对71例患者的骨髓活检标本进行脱钙。分析不同脱钙方案在苏木精&伊红染色、Gomori网染色、免疫组织化学染色和分子分析方面的差异。免疫组化染色以Ki-67、CD20和CD138为一抗,通过DNA浓度分析、原位杂交(ISH)和免疫球蛋白重链(IGH)基因重排进行分子分析。在常规组织病理学分析中,HCl和EDTA之间没有差异。此外,免疫组化染色时,细胞质膜或细胞质CD标记物保存完好。然而,核蛋白,如Ki-67,染色质量较低。相反,根据分子分析,与HCI相比,EDTA方案保存了DNA和RNA。HCl和EDTA两种治疗方案的DNA数量和质量差异均有统计学意义。HCl组38例,EDTA组12例。因此,EDTA方案在组织上保持了蛋白质的抗原性,并且可以接受分子碱基分析的检查。强烈建议骨髓活检采用EDTA脱钙法进行免疫组化染色和分子分析检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of the Effects of Bone Marrow Biopsy Decalcification Methods on Histopathological Examination
Decalcification is routinely performed to obtain a pathological diagnosis using bone marrow biopsy. During the decalcification process using a conventional acidic solution, such as HCl, the antigenicity of tissue is damaged. Especially DNA and RNA in the bone marrow are impaired. Hence, there is the need for a standardized decalcification protocol that preserves the antigenicity of tissue. To this end, we compared the effects of two commonly used decalcifiers: Commercial decalcifier (Calcl-Clear Rapid, HCl) and the EDTA (12.5%, pH 7.0). Bone marrow biopsies sampled from 71 patients were decalcified in accordance with the protocols of respective groups—HCI versus EDTA. The differences of decalcification protocols were analyzed with respect to Hematoxylin & Eosin staining, Gomori’sreticulum staining, and immunohistochemical staining and molecular analysis. Immunohistochemical staining used Ki-67, CD20 and CD138 as primary antibodies and molecular analysis was conducted through the DNA concentration analysis, in situ hybridization (ISH) and immunoglobulin heavy chain (IGH) gene rearrangement. On the routine histopathology analysis, there was no difference between HCl and EDTA. Moreover, in case of immunohistochemical staining, the cytoplasmic membrane or cytoplasmic CD markers was well preserved. However, nuclear proteins, such as Ki-67, were stained with low quality. Conversely, according to the molecular analysis, the EDTA protocol preserved the DNA and RNA compared with the HCI. The differences of DNA quantity and quality were statistically significant between protocols of HCl and EDTA. We used 38 cases in HCl and 12 cases in EDTA. Consequently, the EDTA protocol maintains the antigenicity of the protein on tissue and is acceptable for examination with molecular base analysis. Decalcification of bone marrow biopsy by EDTA is highly recommended for the examination of immunohistochemical staining and molecular analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10649
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信