识别特定的阅读障碍亚型以进行有效的教育补救。

IF 0.5 Q4 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
S. Feifer, R. G. Nader, D. Flanagan, Kim R. Fitzer, Kelly Hicks
{"title":"识别特定的阅读障碍亚型以进行有效的教育补救。","authors":"S. Feifer, R. G. Nader, D. Flanagan, Kim R. Fitzer, Kelly Hicks","doi":"10.18666/LDMJ-2014-V20-I1-5151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The primary purpose of this study was to investigate the various neurocognitive processes concomitant to reading by attempting to identify various subtypes of reading disorders in a referred sample. Participants were 216 elementary school students in grades two through five who were given select subtests of the Woodcock Johnson-III Tests of Cognitive Ability. They were classified using a pattern of strengths and weaknesses (PSW) approach as having no SLD (control), 49 had an Associative Learning (Glr) SLD, 21 had a Gf-Gv SLD, 42 had a Gc SLD, 29 had a Learning Efficiency (Gs) SLD, and 40 had an Executive (Gsm) subtype SLD. Regressions completed for each of the six groups indicated that differing sets of cognitive skills were predictive of reading performance pertaining to letter and word identification skills, reading fluency skills, and passage comprehension skills. Rather than one, unique cognitive profile that represents all students with reading disorders,breakdowns in phonology, orthography, working memory, executive skills, and processing speed contribute in varying amounts to deficits in decoding, fluency, and deriving meaning from print. Viewing reading disorders from a subtype perspective allows us to more accurately classify, and most importantly, inform intervention decision making. Specific intervention recommendations are suggested for each cognitive subtype, and a discussion regarding limitations, and implications for future research are addressed as well.","PeriodicalId":42442,"journal":{"name":"Learning Disabilities-A Multidisciplinary Journal","volume":"27 1","pages":"18-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying Specific Reading Disability Subtypes for Effective Educational Remediation.\",\"authors\":\"S. Feifer, R. G. Nader, D. Flanagan, Kim R. Fitzer, Kelly Hicks\",\"doi\":\"10.18666/LDMJ-2014-V20-I1-5151\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The primary purpose of this study was to investigate the various neurocognitive processes concomitant to reading by attempting to identify various subtypes of reading disorders in a referred sample. Participants were 216 elementary school students in grades two through five who were given select subtests of the Woodcock Johnson-III Tests of Cognitive Ability. They were classified using a pattern of strengths and weaknesses (PSW) approach as having no SLD (control), 49 had an Associative Learning (Glr) SLD, 21 had a Gf-Gv SLD, 42 had a Gc SLD, 29 had a Learning Efficiency (Gs) SLD, and 40 had an Executive (Gsm) subtype SLD. Regressions completed for each of the six groups indicated that differing sets of cognitive skills were predictive of reading performance pertaining to letter and word identification skills, reading fluency skills, and passage comprehension skills. Rather than one, unique cognitive profile that represents all students with reading disorders,breakdowns in phonology, orthography, working memory, executive skills, and processing speed contribute in varying amounts to deficits in decoding, fluency, and deriving meaning from print. Viewing reading disorders from a subtype perspective allows us to more accurately classify, and most importantly, inform intervention decision making. Specific intervention recommendations are suggested for each cognitive subtype, and a discussion regarding limitations, and implications for future research are addressed as well.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42442,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning Disabilities-A Multidisciplinary Journal\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"18-30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning Disabilities-A Multidisciplinary Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18666/LDMJ-2014-V20-I1-5151\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning Disabilities-A Multidisciplinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18666/LDMJ-2014-V20-I1-5151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

本研究的主要目的是通过在参考样本中试图识别阅读障碍的各种亚型来调查阅读伴随的各种神经认知过程。参与者是216名二年级到五年级的小学生,他们接受了伍德考克·约翰逊认知能力测试的部分测试。使用优势和弱点模式(PSW)方法将他们分类为无SLD(对照),49人具有联想学习(Glr) SLD, 21人具有Gf-Gv SLD, 42人具有Gc SLD, 29人具有学习效率(Gs) SLD, 40人具有执行(Gsm)亚型SLD。对六组中的每一组进行的回归分析表明,不同的认知技能可以预测与字母和单词识别技能、阅读流畅性技能和文章理解技能有关的阅读表现。而不是一种独特的认知特征,代表所有有阅读障碍的学生,在音韵学、正字法、工作记忆、执行技能和处理速度方面的缺陷,在不同程度上导致了解码、流利性和从印刷品中获取意义的缺陷。从亚型的角度来看阅读障碍可以让我们更准确地分类,最重要的是,为干预决策提供信息。针对每种认知亚型提出了具体的干预建议,并讨论了其局限性,以及对未来研究的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identifying Specific Reading Disability Subtypes for Effective Educational Remediation.
The primary purpose of this study was to investigate the various neurocognitive processes concomitant to reading by attempting to identify various subtypes of reading disorders in a referred sample. Participants were 216 elementary school students in grades two through five who were given select subtests of the Woodcock Johnson-III Tests of Cognitive Ability. They were classified using a pattern of strengths and weaknesses (PSW) approach as having no SLD (control), 49 had an Associative Learning (Glr) SLD, 21 had a Gf-Gv SLD, 42 had a Gc SLD, 29 had a Learning Efficiency (Gs) SLD, and 40 had an Executive (Gsm) subtype SLD. Regressions completed for each of the six groups indicated that differing sets of cognitive skills were predictive of reading performance pertaining to letter and word identification skills, reading fluency skills, and passage comprehension skills. Rather than one, unique cognitive profile that represents all students with reading disorders,breakdowns in phonology, orthography, working memory, executive skills, and processing speed contribute in varying amounts to deficits in decoding, fluency, and deriving meaning from print. Viewing reading disorders from a subtype perspective allows us to more accurately classify, and most importantly, inform intervention decision making. Specific intervention recommendations are suggested for each cognitive subtype, and a discussion regarding limitations, and implications for future research are addressed as well.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
6.20%
发文量
4
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信