追踪全球知识结构中的权力关系:两个案例研究

S. Vorster, P. Nel
{"title":"追踪全球知识结构中的权力关系:两个案例研究","authors":"S. Vorster, P. Nel","doi":"10.1080/02589349508705015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT How knowledge is produced, legitimised, controlled and disseminated globally are some of the least understood aspects of the international political economy (IPE), despite the fact that intellectual content has become the major factor in comparative trade advantage. Furthermore, the dynamism inherent in the global knowledge structure is producing (and reproducing) deep cleavages in international interaction in ways that we do not grasp because of our reluctance to introduce the concept of “power” into the discourse on knowledge in general, and science and technology in particular. This article suggests how our understanding of the power dimensions of the global knowledge structure may be enhanced by means of detailed case studies of the power differentials involved in a) the 1980's debate about science and technology indicators, and b) the bargaining concerning intellectual property rights during the recently concluded round of GATT negotiations.","PeriodicalId":81644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Commonwealth political studies","volume":"30 1","pages":"52-78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tracing power relations in the global knowledge structure: two case studies\",\"authors\":\"S. Vorster, P. Nel\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02589349508705015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT How knowledge is produced, legitimised, controlled and disseminated globally are some of the least understood aspects of the international political economy (IPE), despite the fact that intellectual content has become the major factor in comparative trade advantage. Furthermore, the dynamism inherent in the global knowledge structure is producing (and reproducing) deep cleavages in international interaction in ways that we do not grasp because of our reluctance to introduce the concept of “power” into the discourse on knowledge in general, and science and technology in particular. This article suggests how our understanding of the power dimensions of the global knowledge structure may be enhanced by means of detailed case studies of the power differentials involved in a) the 1980's debate about science and technology indicators, and b) the bargaining concerning intellectual property rights during the recently concluded round of GATT negotiations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":81644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Commonwealth political studies\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"52-78\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Commonwealth political studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02589349508705015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Commonwealth political studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02589349508705015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

尽管知识内容已经成为比较贸易优势的主要因素,但知识如何在全球范围内产生、合法化、控制和传播,仍是国际政治经济学(IPE)中一些最不为人所知的方面。此外,全球知识结构中固有的动态性正在以我们无法理解的方式在国际互动中产生(并再现)深刻的裂痕,因为我们不愿意将“权力”的概念引入一般的知识话语,特别是科学和技术。本文建议如何通过详细的案例研究来加强我们对全球知识结构的权力维度的理解:a) 20世纪80年代关于科学和技术指标的辩论;b)最近结束的关贸总协定谈判中关于知识产权的讨价还价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tracing power relations in the global knowledge structure: two case studies
ABSTRACT How knowledge is produced, legitimised, controlled and disseminated globally are some of the least understood aspects of the international political economy (IPE), despite the fact that intellectual content has become the major factor in comparative trade advantage. Furthermore, the dynamism inherent in the global knowledge structure is producing (and reproducing) deep cleavages in international interaction in ways that we do not grasp because of our reluctance to introduce the concept of “power” into the discourse on knowledge in general, and science and technology in particular. This article suggests how our understanding of the power dimensions of the global knowledge structure may be enhanced by means of detailed case studies of the power differentials involved in a) the 1980's debate about science and technology indicators, and b) the bargaining concerning intellectual property rights during the recently concluded round of GATT negotiations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信