{"title":"乳腺致密组织乳腺x线摄影对乳腺癌筛查的诊断价值","authors":"Neda Shamsalizadeh, A. Khaki","doi":"10.15296/ijwhr.2023.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"among women in the United States (1). Women at a younger age are more likely to have an aggressive case with a poorer prognosis. In the US, about 33,000 women younger than 45 years old are diagnosed with breast cancer annually. Among this age group, breast cancer is the leading cause for cancer-related deaths. It is predicted that around one in eight women will get breast cancer (2). Women younger than 45 years old account for approximately nine percent of all new cases of breast cancer in the US. In addition, dense breast tissue is more prevalent in younger women. Unlike fatty breast tissue, dense breast tissue absorbs more radiation during mammograms (3,4). Therefore, the accuracy and the diagnostic value of mammograms decrease for breast cancer detection among women with dense breast tissue (3). Dense breast tissue increases the risk for developing breast cancer by 4.7 times (1). Studies showed ultrasound (US) increases the breast cancer detection among women with dense breast tissue (1,5). In women with dense tissue adding US testing increased detection sensitivity as compared to only Mammogram screening (6). Regardless of breast type, density, and history, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has the highest, and mammography has the lowest sensitivity for breast cancer detection (7). The predicted total cost of metastatic breast cancer will be US$ 152.4 in 2030 (8). The cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening with MRI among younger women with dense breast tissue is controversial. A false negative mammogram leads to a failure in finding breast cancer advancement early enough to prevent incurable stages and therefore a premature death (9). In addition, false positive mammograms can cause anxiety and additional costs for women with no breast cancer (9). A quality-assured mammographic screening program showed about two-thirds of women with breast cancer at the time of screening will remain underdiagnosed or the cancer will not be detected early enough so it progresses to metastatic cancer (9,10). Although only women with breast cancer can benefit from mammogram screenings, many of these women remain Diagnostic Value of Mammogram for Breast Cancer Screening in Women With Dense Breast Tissue","PeriodicalId":14346,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Women's Health and Reproduction Sciences","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Value of Mammogram for Breast Cancer Screening in Women With Dense Breast Tissue\",\"authors\":\"Neda Shamsalizadeh, A. Khaki\",\"doi\":\"10.15296/ijwhr.2023.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"among women in the United States (1). Women at a younger age are more likely to have an aggressive case with a poorer prognosis. In the US, about 33,000 women younger than 45 years old are diagnosed with breast cancer annually. Among this age group, breast cancer is the leading cause for cancer-related deaths. It is predicted that around one in eight women will get breast cancer (2). Women younger than 45 years old account for approximately nine percent of all new cases of breast cancer in the US. In addition, dense breast tissue is more prevalent in younger women. Unlike fatty breast tissue, dense breast tissue absorbs more radiation during mammograms (3,4). Therefore, the accuracy and the diagnostic value of mammograms decrease for breast cancer detection among women with dense breast tissue (3). Dense breast tissue increases the risk for developing breast cancer by 4.7 times (1). Studies showed ultrasound (US) increases the breast cancer detection among women with dense breast tissue (1,5). In women with dense tissue adding US testing increased detection sensitivity as compared to only Mammogram screening (6). Regardless of breast type, density, and history, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has the highest, and mammography has the lowest sensitivity for breast cancer detection (7). The predicted total cost of metastatic breast cancer will be US$ 152.4 in 2030 (8). The cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening with MRI among younger women with dense breast tissue is controversial. A false negative mammogram leads to a failure in finding breast cancer advancement early enough to prevent incurable stages and therefore a premature death (9). In addition, false positive mammograms can cause anxiety and additional costs for women with no breast cancer (9). A quality-assured mammographic screening program showed about two-thirds of women with breast cancer at the time of screening will remain underdiagnosed or the cancer will not be detected early enough so it progresses to metastatic cancer (9,10). Although only women with breast cancer can benefit from mammogram screenings, many of these women remain Diagnostic Value of Mammogram for Breast Cancer Screening in Women With Dense Breast Tissue\",\"PeriodicalId\":14346,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Women's Health and Reproduction Sciences\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Women's Health and Reproduction Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15296/ijwhr.2023.01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Women's Health and Reproduction Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15296/ijwhr.2023.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Diagnostic Value of Mammogram for Breast Cancer Screening in Women With Dense Breast Tissue
among women in the United States (1). Women at a younger age are more likely to have an aggressive case with a poorer prognosis. In the US, about 33,000 women younger than 45 years old are diagnosed with breast cancer annually. Among this age group, breast cancer is the leading cause for cancer-related deaths. It is predicted that around one in eight women will get breast cancer (2). Women younger than 45 years old account for approximately nine percent of all new cases of breast cancer in the US. In addition, dense breast tissue is more prevalent in younger women. Unlike fatty breast tissue, dense breast tissue absorbs more radiation during mammograms (3,4). Therefore, the accuracy and the diagnostic value of mammograms decrease for breast cancer detection among women with dense breast tissue (3). Dense breast tissue increases the risk for developing breast cancer by 4.7 times (1). Studies showed ultrasound (US) increases the breast cancer detection among women with dense breast tissue (1,5). In women with dense tissue adding US testing increased detection sensitivity as compared to only Mammogram screening (6). Regardless of breast type, density, and history, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has the highest, and mammography has the lowest sensitivity for breast cancer detection (7). The predicted total cost of metastatic breast cancer will be US$ 152.4 in 2030 (8). The cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening with MRI among younger women with dense breast tissue is controversial. A false negative mammogram leads to a failure in finding breast cancer advancement early enough to prevent incurable stages and therefore a premature death (9). In addition, false positive mammograms can cause anxiety and additional costs for women with no breast cancer (9). A quality-assured mammographic screening program showed about two-thirds of women with breast cancer at the time of screening will remain underdiagnosed or the cancer will not be detected early enough so it progresses to metastatic cancer (9,10). Although only women with breast cancer can benefit from mammogram screenings, many of these women remain Diagnostic Value of Mammogram for Breast Cancer Screening in Women With Dense Breast Tissue
期刊介绍:
All kind of knowledge contributing to the development of science by its content, value, level and originality will be covered by IJWHR. Problems of public health and their solutions are at the head of the windows opening us to the world. The "International Journal of Women''s Health and Reproduction Sciences” is a modern forum for scientific communication, covering all aspects women health and reproduction sciences, in basic and clinical sciences, mainly including: -Medical Education in Women Health and Reproduction Sciences -Cardiology in Women Health-Related Reproductive Problems -Sports Medicine in Women Health and Reproduction Sciences -Psychiatry in Women Health-Related Reproductive Problems -Antioxidant Therapy in Reproduction Medicine Sciences -Nutrition in Women Health and Reproduction Sciences -Defense Androgen and Estrogen -Fertility and Infertility -Urogynecology -Endometriosis -Endocrinology -Breast Cancer -Menopause -Puberty -Eroticism -Pregnancy -Preterm Birth -Vaginal Diseases -Sex-Based Biology -Surgical Procedures -Nursing in Pregnancy -Obstetrics/Gynecology -Polycystic Ovary Syndrome -Hyperandrogenism in Females -Menstrual Syndrome and Complications -Oncology of Female Reproductive Organs -Traditional Medicine in Women Reproductive Health -Ultrasound in Women Health Reproduction sciences -Stem Cell Research In Women Reproduction Sciences -Complementary Medicine in Women Reproductive Health -Female Sexual Dysfunction: Pathophysiology & Treatment