伊朗与美国杜克大学护理博士教育体系新课程比较研究

M. Rad, M. Fallahi Khoshknab, N. Arsalani, S. Assarzadeh, N. Sadeghi Mahali, P. Rasouli, T. Nematifard
{"title":"伊朗与美国杜克大学护理博士教育体系新课程比较研究","authors":"M. Rad, M. Fallahi Khoshknab, N. Arsalani, S. Assarzadeh, N. Sadeghi Mahali, P. Rasouli, T. Nematifard","doi":"10.52547/rme.13.2.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"©2021 Guilan University of Medical Science ABSTACT Introduction: Nursing knowledge and profession will not develop well; if the quality of the doctoral program of nursing is not systematically examined Quality of the program needs to reviewing and evaluating the programs periodically by the Internal and External Quality Assurance Committee. In this regards, this comparative study of educational system of nursing doctorate in Iran and Duke University has been done. Methods: This descriptive-comparative study was conducted in 2020. The four-stage Bereday model include description, interpretation, proximity and comparison were used to compare the nursing educational system in Iran and Duke University. After collecting data, the data were classified and compared. Results: Although Duke University and Iran curricula have similarities in philosophy, job position, course content, teaching techniques, and student evaluation, there are differences in both curricula, including the use of nursing metaparadigms. In the curriculum of Duke University, all four metaparadigms of nursing have been discussed but in the curriculum of Iran, two metaparadigms have been mentioned. How to admit students and manner of education are the other subjects. Educational techniques and job position are among the similarities between the two educational programs, but the most important differences between them are educational content and way of admitting students. Conclusion: Although the new curriculum of the Doctor of Nursing has tried to pay attention to the clinic in addition to educational programs, but the recent curriculum in Iran, despite all its efforts to train clinical staff, is more educational and requires another curriculum to train clinical staff. However, in the curriculum of Duke University, nursing Ph. D education course separate from doctorate clinical nursing. Therefore, It is suggested to initiate a specialized clinical doctorate course in the coming years and separate it from training course which have different goals.","PeriodicalId":75518,"journal":{"name":"Annual Conference on Research in Medical Education. Conference on Research in Medical Education","volume":"99 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study of the New Curriculum of Nursing PhD Education System in Iran and Duke University of America\",\"authors\":\"M. Rad, M. Fallahi Khoshknab, N. Arsalani, S. Assarzadeh, N. Sadeghi Mahali, P. Rasouli, T. Nematifard\",\"doi\":\"10.52547/rme.13.2.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"©2021 Guilan University of Medical Science ABSTACT Introduction: Nursing knowledge and profession will not develop well; if the quality of the doctoral program of nursing is not systematically examined Quality of the program needs to reviewing and evaluating the programs periodically by the Internal and External Quality Assurance Committee. In this regards, this comparative study of educational system of nursing doctorate in Iran and Duke University has been done. Methods: This descriptive-comparative study was conducted in 2020. The four-stage Bereday model include description, interpretation, proximity and comparison were used to compare the nursing educational system in Iran and Duke University. After collecting data, the data were classified and compared. Results: Although Duke University and Iran curricula have similarities in philosophy, job position, course content, teaching techniques, and student evaluation, there are differences in both curricula, including the use of nursing metaparadigms. In the curriculum of Duke University, all four metaparadigms of nursing have been discussed but in the curriculum of Iran, two metaparadigms have been mentioned. How to admit students and manner of education are the other subjects. Educational techniques and job position are among the similarities between the two educational programs, but the most important differences between them are educational content and way of admitting students. Conclusion: Although the new curriculum of the Doctor of Nursing has tried to pay attention to the clinic in addition to educational programs, but the recent curriculum in Iran, despite all its efforts to train clinical staff, is more educational and requires another curriculum to train clinical staff. However, in the curriculum of Duke University, nursing Ph. D education course separate from doctorate clinical nursing. Therefore, It is suggested to initiate a specialized clinical doctorate course in the coming years and separate it from training course which have different goals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":75518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annual Conference on Research in Medical Education. Conference on Research in Medical Education\",\"volume\":\"99 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annual Conference on Research in Medical Education. Conference on Research in Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52547/rme.13.2.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Conference on Research in Medical Education. Conference on Research in Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/rme.13.2.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要简介:护理知识和专业发展不好;如果护理博士课程的质量没有得到系统的检查,项目的质量需要由内部和外部质量保证委员会定期审查和评估项目。为此,本文对伊朗和美国杜克大学护理博士教育体系进行了比较研究。方法:本描述性比较研究于2020年进行。采用描述、解释、接近和比较四阶段Bereday模型对伊朗和杜克大学的护理教育系统进行比较。收集数据后,对数据进行分类和比较。结果:尽管杜克大学和伊朗的课程在理念、工作岗位、课程内容、教学技巧和学生评价方面有相似之处,但两国的课程存在差异,包括护理元范式的使用。在杜克大学的课程中,讨论了护理的所有四种元范式,但在伊朗的课程中,提到了两种元范式。如何录取学生和教育方式是另一个主题。教育技术和工作岗位是两种教育方案的相似之处,但最重要的区别是教育内容和招生方式。结论:虽然护理博士的新课程在教育项目之外尝试关注临床,但伊朗最近的课程,尽管努力培养临床人员,但更多的是教育,需要另一个课程来培养临床人员。然而,在杜克大学的课程设置中,护理学博士教育课程与临床护理学博士课程是分开的。因此,建议今后几年开设专门的临床博士课程,并将其从目标不同的培训课程中分离出来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparative Study of the New Curriculum of Nursing PhD Education System in Iran and Duke University of America
©2021 Guilan University of Medical Science ABSTACT Introduction: Nursing knowledge and profession will not develop well; if the quality of the doctoral program of nursing is not systematically examined Quality of the program needs to reviewing and evaluating the programs periodically by the Internal and External Quality Assurance Committee. In this regards, this comparative study of educational system of nursing doctorate in Iran and Duke University has been done. Methods: This descriptive-comparative study was conducted in 2020. The four-stage Bereday model include description, interpretation, proximity and comparison were used to compare the nursing educational system in Iran and Duke University. After collecting data, the data were classified and compared. Results: Although Duke University and Iran curricula have similarities in philosophy, job position, course content, teaching techniques, and student evaluation, there are differences in both curricula, including the use of nursing metaparadigms. In the curriculum of Duke University, all four metaparadigms of nursing have been discussed but in the curriculum of Iran, two metaparadigms have been mentioned. How to admit students and manner of education are the other subjects. Educational techniques and job position are among the similarities between the two educational programs, but the most important differences between them are educational content and way of admitting students. Conclusion: Although the new curriculum of the Doctor of Nursing has tried to pay attention to the clinic in addition to educational programs, but the recent curriculum in Iran, despite all its efforts to train clinical staff, is more educational and requires another curriculum to train clinical staff. However, in the curriculum of Duke University, nursing Ph. D education course separate from doctorate clinical nursing. Therefore, It is suggested to initiate a specialized clinical doctorate course in the coming years and separate it from training course which have different goals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信