教师需求与专业发展:系统回顾

IF 0.2 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
H. Kim, Keith M. Graham
{"title":"教师需求与专业发展:系统回顾","authors":"H. Kim, Keith M. Graham","doi":"10.5294/laclil.2022.15.1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study utilizes a systematic review process to synthesize research on content and language integrated learning (CLIL) teachers’ self-reported needs and professional development. In order to draw connections between these two areas of research and highlight gaps, this study adopted a framework composed of seven competences: linguistic, pedagogical, scientific knowledge, organizational, interpersonal, collaborative, and reflective. Six electronic databases were used, and a forward and backward search was conducted. After considering inclusion criteria, 43 articles were included, with 33 studies for teachers’ needs, nine for professional development, and one for accounting for both. The findings of the review showcase that not all competences have received equal coverage in the literature. In some cases, teachers’ reported needs within a ­competence were not addressed in the professional development literature. Further, the reports of many ­competences seem to be general, suggesting future work may need to examine each competence in more depth.","PeriodicalId":43989,"journal":{"name":"Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated-LACLIL","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teachers’ Needs and Professional Development: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"H. Kim, Keith M. Graham\",\"doi\":\"10.5294/laclil.2022.15.1.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study utilizes a systematic review process to synthesize research on content and language integrated learning (CLIL) teachers’ self-reported needs and professional development. In order to draw connections between these two areas of research and highlight gaps, this study adopted a framework composed of seven competences: linguistic, pedagogical, scientific knowledge, organizational, interpersonal, collaborative, and reflective. Six electronic databases were used, and a forward and backward search was conducted. After considering inclusion criteria, 43 articles were included, with 33 studies for teachers’ needs, nine for professional development, and one for accounting for both. The findings of the review showcase that not all competences have received equal coverage in the literature. In some cases, teachers’ reported needs within a ­competence were not addressed in the professional development literature. Further, the reports of many ­competences seem to be general, suggesting future work may need to examine each competence in more depth.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated-LACLIL\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated-LACLIL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2022.15.1.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated-LACLIL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2022.15.1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究采用系统回顾的方法,综合研究内容与语言整合学习(CLIL)教师自我报告需求与专业发展的关系。为了在这两个研究领域之间建立联系并突出差距,本研究采用了一个由七种能力组成的框架:语言、教学、科学知识、组织、人际、协作和反思。使用了6个电子数据库,并进行了向前和向后检索。在考虑纳入标准后,纳入了43篇文章,其中33篇研究是关于教师需求的,9篇是关于专业发展的,1篇是关于两者的。回顾的结果表明,并不是所有的能力在文献中都得到了平等的报道。在某些情况下,教师在能力范围内报告的需求在专业发展文献中没有得到解决。此外,许多能力的报告似乎是一般性的,这表明未来的工作可能需要更深入地研究每一项能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Teachers’ Needs and Professional Development: A Systematic Review
This study utilizes a systematic review process to synthesize research on content and language integrated learning (CLIL) teachers’ self-reported needs and professional development. In order to draw connections between these two areas of research and highlight gaps, this study adopted a framework composed of seven competences: linguistic, pedagogical, scientific knowledge, organizational, interpersonal, collaborative, and reflective. Six electronic databases were used, and a forward and backward search was conducted. After considering inclusion criteria, 43 articles were included, with 33 studies for teachers’ needs, nine for professional development, and one for accounting for both. The findings of the review showcase that not all competences have received equal coverage in the literature. In some cases, teachers’ reported needs within a ­competence were not addressed in the professional development literature. Further, the reports of many ­competences seem to be general, suggesting future work may need to examine each competence in more depth.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信