关于“地方民主实践的民主质量评价——以七个框架为例”的思考

Sofia Rönnqvist
{"title":"关于“地方民主实践的民主质量评价——以七个框架为例”的思考","authors":"Sofia Rönnqvist","doi":"10.58235/sjpa.v25i3-4.7084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I have been an evaluator for a decade and have been involved in evaluation of programmes and projects with both formative and summative designs. The majority (but far from all) of the evaluations have been funded by the European Union and the stakeholders include municipal, regional and state organisations. My reflections on this article revolve around the usefulness and accessibility of the models discussed. This is because, in my experience, evaluations tend to lose their purpose if they do not meet the needs of practitioners (for example, officials or representatives for NGOs) and policymakers, but also because evaluators often find themselves struggling to put academic evaluation models into practice.","PeriodicalId":31772,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration","volume":"93 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reflection on: “Evaluating the Democratic Quality of Local Democratic Practices – Sampling Seven Frameworks”\",\"authors\":\"Sofia Rönnqvist\",\"doi\":\"10.58235/sjpa.v25i3-4.7084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I have been an evaluator for a decade and have been involved in evaluation of programmes and projects with both formative and summative designs. The majority (but far from all) of the evaluations have been funded by the European Union and the stakeholders include municipal, regional and state organisations. My reflections on this article revolve around the usefulness and accessibility of the models discussed. This is because, in my experience, evaluations tend to lose their purpose if they do not meet the needs of practitioners (for example, officials or representatives for NGOs) and policymakers, but also because evaluators often find themselves struggling to put academic evaluation models into practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31772,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration\",\"volume\":\"93 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.58235/sjpa.v25i3-4.7084\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58235/sjpa.v25i3-4.7084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我已经做了十年的评估员,并参与了对形成性和总结性设计的方案和项目的评估。大多数(但不是全部)评估是由欧盟资助的,利益相关者包括市政、地区和国家组织。我对本文的思考围绕着所讨论的模型的有用性和可访问性。这是因为,根据我的经验,如果评估不能满足从业者(例如,官员或非政府组织的代表)和决策者的需求,评估往往会失去目的,而且还因为评估者经常发现自己很难将学术评估模型付诸实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reflection on: “Evaluating the Democratic Quality of Local Democratic Practices – Sampling Seven Frameworks”
I have been an evaluator for a decade and have been involved in evaluation of programmes and projects with both formative and summative designs. The majority (but far from all) of the evaluations have been funded by the European Union and the stakeholders include municipal, regional and state organisations. My reflections on this article revolve around the usefulness and accessibility of the models discussed. This is because, in my experience, evaluations tend to lose their purpose if they do not meet the needs of practitioners (for example, officials or representatives for NGOs) and policymakers, but also because evaluators often find themselves struggling to put academic evaluation models into practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
52 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信