对蒲甘、丹尼夫斯卡和伊柳希纳的回应:塔纳托斯的无人机

IF 0.5 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, PSYCHOANALYSIS
Penelope S. Starr-Karlin
{"title":"对蒲甘、丹尼夫斯卡和伊柳希纳的回应:塔纳托斯的无人机","authors":"Penelope S. Starr-Karlin","doi":"10.1080/24720038.2023.2209138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Our Ukrainian colleagues write from the epicenter of a war that ripples outward, touching us too as distant neighbors in a global economy and community. This response summarizes their experience and focuses on a significant pattern that stands out amongst the many ordeals: the impact of multiple, simultaneous, and cumulative losses which combine, becoming a “complex-context,” a disturbing addition to stress on relational connections. The implications of this are explored along with the way self-experience is affected. These therapists offer poignant glimpses into the difficulties of being a “Relational Home” to patients when both are thrown into a collective tragedy. We in the US, may wish to respond in kinship, in turn becoming their Relational Homes, but we must then in addition to understanding the existential phenomenology that is integral to all human lives, find analogs relevant to their gritty experience: uncertainty about basic survival, ruination of home and other symbolic objects, brutal intrusions including the news of atrocities, and the terrifying destabilization of familiar selfhood. Using an intersubjective-systems theory perspective on working with trauma I offer a possible way that we in the USA can derive analogs from recent American experience.","PeriodicalId":42308,"journal":{"name":"Psychoanalysis Self and Context","volume":"34 1","pages":"416 - 426"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Response to Bagan, Danylevska, and Ilyukhina: The drones of Thanatos\",\"authors\":\"Penelope S. Starr-Karlin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24720038.2023.2209138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Our Ukrainian colleagues write from the epicenter of a war that ripples outward, touching us too as distant neighbors in a global economy and community. This response summarizes their experience and focuses on a significant pattern that stands out amongst the many ordeals: the impact of multiple, simultaneous, and cumulative losses which combine, becoming a “complex-context,” a disturbing addition to stress on relational connections. The implications of this are explored along with the way self-experience is affected. These therapists offer poignant glimpses into the difficulties of being a “Relational Home” to patients when both are thrown into a collective tragedy. We in the US, may wish to respond in kinship, in turn becoming their Relational Homes, but we must then in addition to understanding the existential phenomenology that is integral to all human lives, find analogs relevant to their gritty experience: uncertainty about basic survival, ruination of home and other symbolic objects, brutal intrusions including the news of atrocities, and the terrifying destabilization of familiar selfhood. Using an intersubjective-systems theory perspective on working with trauma I offer a possible way that we in the USA can derive analogs from recent American experience.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychoanalysis Self and Context\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"416 - 426\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychoanalysis Self and Context\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24720038.2023.2209138\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, PSYCHOANALYSIS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychoanalysis Self and Context","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24720038.2023.2209138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, PSYCHOANALYSIS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们的乌克兰同事在一场战争的中心撰文,这场战争向外蔓延,也触动了我们作为全球经济和社区中的遥远邻居。这一回应总结了他们的经验,并将重点放在一个重要的模式上,这个模式在许多考验中脱颖而出:多重、同时和累积的损失的影响结合在一起,成为一个“复杂的背景”,对关系联系的压力是一个令人不安的补充。这其中的含义与自我体验受到影响的方式一起被探讨。当双方都陷入集体悲剧时,这些治疗师让我们深刻地看到了作为一个“关系之家”对病人的困难。我们在美国,可能希望以亲属关系来回应,反过来成为他们的关系家园,但我们必须除了理解所有人类生活中不可或缺的存在现象学之外,找到与他们坚忍摧的经历相关的类比:基本生存的不确定性,家庭和其他象征性物体的毁灭,残酷的入侵,包括暴行的新闻,以及熟悉的自我的可怕的不稳定。使用主体间系统理论的视角来研究创伤,我提供了一种可能的方法,即我们在美国可以从最近的美国经验中获得类似的东西。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Response to Bagan, Danylevska, and Ilyukhina: The drones of Thanatos
ABSTRACT Our Ukrainian colleagues write from the epicenter of a war that ripples outward, touching us too as distant neighbors in a global economy and community. This response summarizes their experience and focuses on a significant pattern that stands out amongst the many ordeals: the impact of multiple, simultaneous, and cumulative losses which combine, becoming a “complex-context,” a disturbing addition to stress on relational connections. The implications of this are explored along with the way self-experience is affected. These therapists offer poignant glimpses into the difficulties of being a “Relational Home” to patients when both are thrown into a collective tragedy. We in the US, may wish to respond in kinship, in turn becoming their Relational Homes, but we must then in addition to understanding the existential phenomenology that is integral to all human lives, find analogs relevant to their gritty experience: uncertainty about basic survival, ruination of home and other symbolic objects, brutal intrusions including the news of atrocities, and the terrifying destabilization of familiar selfhood. Using an intersubjective-systems theory perspective on working with trauma I offer a possible way that we in the USA can derive analogs from recent American experience.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychoanalysis Self and Context
Psychoanalysis Self and Context PSYCHOLOGY, PSYCHOANALYSIS-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
33.30%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信