{"title":"俄罗斯联邦司法实践中诚信原则框架下的禁止反悔原则","authors":"Anatoly A. Kovalenko","doi":"10.18572/1812-3929-2023-3-55-60","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses the application of the principle of “estoppel” in the judicial practice of the Russian Federation. The author reveals the concept of the estoppel doctrine in the context of the principle of good faith. Based on the analysis of court decisions, a conclusion is made about a change in the traditional understanding of the estoppel doctrine in the realities of the modern judicial system.","PeriodicalId":81750,"journal":{"name":"Jurist (Washington, D.C.)","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Estoppel Doctrine within the Framework of the Principle of Good Faith in the Judicial Practice of the Russian Federation\",\"authors\":\"Anatoly A. Kovalenko\",\"doi\":\"10.18572/1812-3929-2023-3-55-60\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article discusses the application of the principle of “estoppel” in the judicial practice of the Russian Federation. The author reveals the concept of the estoppel doctrine in the context of the principle of good faith. Based on the analysis of court decisions, a conclusion is made about a change in the traditional understanding of the estoppel doctrine in the realities of the modern judicial system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":81750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurist (Washington, D.C.)\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurist (Washington, D.C.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-3929-2023-3-55-60\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurist (Washington, D.C.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-3929-2023-3-55-60","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Estoppel Doctrine within the Framework of the Principle of Good Faith in the Judicial Practice of the Russian Federation
This article discusses the application of the principle of “estoppel” in the judicial practice of the Russian Federation. The author reveals the concept of the estoppel doctrine in the context of the principle of good faith. Based on the analysis of court decisions, a conclusion is made about a change in the traditional understanding of the estoppel doctrine in the realities of the modern judicial system.