配对贝叶斯方法和系统理论,实现基于学习的系统的测试和评估

IF 1 4区 工程技术 Q4 INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION
Insight Pub Date : 2023-02-09 DOI:10.1002/inst.12414
Paul Wach, Justin Krometis, Atharva Sonanis, Dinesh Verma, Jitesh Panchal, Laura Freeman, Peter Beling
{"title":"配对贝叶斯方法和系统理论,实现基于学习的系统的测试和评估","authors":"Paul Wach,&nbsp;Justin Krometis,&nbsp;Atharva Sonanis,&nbsp;Dinesh Verma,&nbsp;Jitesh Panchal,&nbsp;Laura Freeman,&nbsp;Peter Beling","doi":"10.1002/inst.12414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Modern engineered systems, and learning-based systems, in particular, provide unprecedented complexity that requires advancement in our methods to achieve confidence in mission success through test and evaluation (T&amp;E). We define learning-based systems as engineered systems that incorporate a learning algorithm (artificial intelligence) component of the overall system. A part of the unparalleled complexity is the rate at which learning-based systems change over traditional engineered systems. Where traditional systems are expected to steadily decline (change) in performance due to time (aging), learning-based systems undergo a constant change which must be better understood to achieve high confidence in mission success. To this end, we propose pairing Bayesian methods with systems theory to quantify changes in operational conditions, changes in adversarial actions, resultant changes in the learning-based system structure, and resultant confidence measures in mission success. We provide insights, in this article, into our overall goal and progress toward developing a framework for evaluation through an understanding of equivalence of testing.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13956,"journal":{"name":"Insight","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pairing Bayesian Methods and Systems Theory to Enable Test and Evaluation of Learning-Based Systems\",\"authors\":\"Paul Wach,&nbsp;Justin Krometis,&nbsp;Atharva Sonanis,&nbsp;Dinesh Verma,&nbsp;Jitesh Panchal,&nbsp;Laura Freeman,&nbsp;Peter Beling\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/inst.12414\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Modern engineered systems, and learning-based systems, in particular, provide unprecedented complexity that requires advancement in our methods to achieve confidence in mission success through test and evaluation (T&amp;E). We define learning-based systems as engineered systems that incorporate a learning algorithm (artificial intelligence) component of the overall system. A part of the unparalleled complexity is the rate at which learning-based systems change over traditional engineered systems. Where traditional systems are expected to steadily decline (change) in performance due to time (aging), learning-based systems undergo a constant change which must be better understood to achieve high confidence in mission success. To this end, we propose pairing Bayesian methods with systems theory to quantify changes in operational conditions, changes in adversarial actions, resultant changes in the learning-based system structure, and resultant confidence measures in mission success. We provide insights, in this article, into our overall goal and progress toward developing a framework for evaluation through an understanding of equivalence of testing.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Insight\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Insight\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/inst.12414\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insight","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/inst.12414","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现代工程系统,特别是基于学习的系统,提供了前所未有的复杂性,需要我们在方法上取得进步,通过测试和评估来实现任务成功的信心(T&E)。我们将基于学习的系统定义为包含整个系统的学习算法(人工智能)组件的工程系统。这种无与伦比的复杂性的一部分是基于学习的系统相对于传统工程系统的变化速度。由于时间(老化),传统系统的性能预计会稳步下降(变化),而基于学习的系统则会经历不断的变化,必须更好地了解这种变化,才能对任务的成功抱有高度的信心。为此,我们提出将贝叶斯方法与系统理论相结合,量化作战条件的变化、对抗行动的变化、基于学习的系统结构的由此变化,以及由此产生的任务成功信心措施。在这篇文章中,我们提供了对我们的总体目标的见解,以及通过理解测试的等价性来开发评估框架的进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pairing Bayesian Methods and Systems Theory to Enable Test and Evaluation of Learning-Based Systems

Modern engineered systems, and learning-based systems, in particular, provide unprecedented complexity that requires advancement in our methods to achieve confidence in mission success through test and evaluation (T&E). We define learning-based systems as engineered systems that incorporate a learning algorithm (artificial intelligence) component of the overall system. A part of the unparalleled complexity is the rate at which learning-based systems change over traditional engineered systems. Where traditional systems are expected to steadily decline (change) in performance due to time (aging), learning-based systems undergo a constant change which must be better understood to achieve high confidence in mission success. To this end, we propose pairing Bayesian methods with systems theory to quantify changes in operational conditions, changes in adversarial actions, resultant changes in the learning-based system structure, and resultant confidence measures in mission success. We provide insights, in this article, into our overall goal and progress toward developing a framework for evaluation through an understanding of equivalence of testing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Insight
Insight 工程技术-材料科学:表征与测试
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: Official Journal of The British Institute of Non-Destructive Testing - includes original research and devlopment papers, technical and scientific reviews and case studies in the fields of NDT and CM.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信