关于学生研究杂志上的文章

S. Sujito, Mujiono Mujiono, Wildan Mahir Muttaqin
{"title":"关于学生研究杂志上的文章","authors":"S. Sujito, Mujiono Mujiono, Wildan Mahir Muttaqin","doi":"10.30957/LINGUA.V16I1.573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":" This study was intended to test the differences between the students who were given comprehensive modeling and those who are not given comprehensive modeling concerning with their achievement of Scientific Journal Writing in English Educational Department of IAIN Surakarta. The sample consists of 34 students randomly selected from the population. Data were collected by administering the writing test and analyzed by correlated sample t-test. The result revealed that there was a significant difference between students who were given comprehensive modeling and those who were not given comprehensive modeling in their achievement of Scientific Journal Writing in English Educational Department of IAIN Surakarta. It was derived that p=.000 >.005. So, the alternate hypothesis stating that the EFL students who were given comprehensive modeling have higher achievement in Scientific Journal Writing than those given conventional method was accepted. It means that the comprehensive modeling is an effective way to develop students' achievement in Scientific Journal Writing in English Educational Department of IAIN Surakarta.  ","PeriodicalId":52818,"journal":{"name":"Ethical Lingua Journal of Language Teaching and Literature","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PENGARUH TENIK COMPREHENSIVE MODELLING TERHADAP MUTU LINGUISTIS, RETORIKA DAN MEKANIS PADA ARTIKEL JURNAL PENELITIAN MAHASISWA\",\"authors\":\"S. Sujito, Mujiono Mujiono, Wildan Mahir Muttaqin\",\"doi\":\"10.30957/LINGUA.V16I1.573\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\" This study was intended to test the differences between the students who were given comprehensive modeling and those who are not given comprehensive modeling concerning with their achievement of Scientific Journal Writing in English Educational Department of IAIN Surakarta. The sample consists of 34 students randomly selected from the population. Data were collected by administering the writing test and analyzed by correlated sample t-test. The result revealed that there was a significant difference between students who were given comprehensive modeling and those who were not given comprehensive modeling in their achievement of Scientific Journal Writing in English Educational Department of IAIN Surakarta. It was derived that p=.000 >.005. So, the alternate hypothesis stating that the EFL students who were given comprehensive modeling have higher achievement in Scientific Journal Writing than those given conventional method was accepted. It means that the comprehensive modeling is an effective way to develop students' achievement in Scientific Journal Writing in English Educational Department of IAIN Surakarta.  \",\"PeriodicalId\":52818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethical Lingua Journal of Language Teaching and Literature\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethical Lingua Journal of Language Teaching and Literature\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30957/LINGUA.V16I1.573\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethical Lingua Journal of Language Teaching and Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30957/LINGUA.V16I1.573","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究旨在检验综合建模组与未综合建模组学生在科学期刊写作成绩上的差异。样本由从总体中随机选择的34名学生组成。资料收集采用写作检验,分析采用相关样本t检验。结果显示,综合建模组与未综合建模组的学生在科学期刊写作成绩上存在显著差异。得到p=。000 > .005。因此,采用综合建模方法的学生比采用常规方法的学生在科学期刊写作方面取得更高的成绩这一备选假设被接受。这说明综合建模是提高雅加达大学英语教育系学生科技期刊写作成绩的有效途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PENGARUH TENIK COMPREHENSIVE MODELLING TERHADAP MUTU LINGUISTIS, RETORIKA DAN MEKANIS PADA ARTIKEL JURNAL PENELITIAN MAHASISWA
 This study was intended to test the differences between the students who were given comprehensive modeling and those who are not given comprehensive modeling concerning with their achievement of Scientific Journal Writing in English Educational Department of IAIN Surakarta. The sample consists of 34 students randomly selected from the population. Data were collected by administering the writing test and analyzed by correlated sample t-test. The result revealed that there was a significant difference between students who were given comprehensive modeling and those who were not given comprehensive modeling in their achievement of Scientific Journal Writing in English Educational Department of IAIN Surakarta. It was derived that p=.000 >.005. So, the alternate hypothesis stating that the EFL students who were given comprehensive modeling have higher achievement in Scientific Journal Writing than those given conventional method was accepted. It means that the comprehensive modeling is an effective way to develop students' achievement in Scientific Journal Writing in English Educational Department of IAIN Surakarta.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信