基本原理和神经分化:对国粹计划的反思和影响

IF 0.3 4区哲学 Q2 Arts and Humanities

Science in Context Pub Date : 2022-01-31 DOI:10.46580/cx60127

Quin Thomson

{"title":"基本原理和神经分化:对国粹计划的反思和影响","authors":"Quin Thomson","doi":"10.46580/cx60127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Autumn 2003, under a previous name, I published a research report in this journal, entitled ‘The Quintessence Project: Re-envisioning Mediæval Music through the Lens of Electroacoustic Technology.’ The report detailed the beginnings of an effort to blend historically informed performance practice (specifically of Gregorian chant) with improvisatory techniques, scaffolded by electroacoustic ‘found sound’ techniques including looping, filtering and granulation…","PeriodicalId":49562,"journal":{"name":"Science in Context","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rationale and Neurodivergence: Reflections on, and Repercussions of, the Quintessence Project\",\"authors\":\"Quin Thomson\",\"doi\":\"10.46580/cx60127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In Autumn 2003, under a previous name, I published a research report in this journal, entitled ‘The Quintessence Project: Re-envisioning Mediæval Music through the Lens of Electroacoustic Technology.’ The report detailed the beginnings of an effort to blend historically informed performance practice (specifically of Gregorian chant) with improvisatory techniques, scaffolded by electroacoustic ‘found sound’ techniques including looping, filtering and granulation…\",\"PeriodicalId\":49562,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science in Context\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science in Context\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46580/cx60127\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science in Context","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46580/cx60127","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

2003年秋，我在该杂志上发表了一篇研究报告，题为《国粹项目:通过电声技术的镜头重新设想mediaeval音乐》。该报告详细介绍了将历史上的表演实践(特别是格里高利圣咏)与即兴技巧结合起来的努力的开始，并以电声“发现的声音”技术为基础，包括循环、过滤和颗粒化……

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Rationale and Neurodivergence: Reflections on, and Repercussions of, the Quintessence Project

In Autumn 2003, under a previous name, I published a research report in this journal, entitled ‘The Quintessence Project: Re-envisioning Mediæval Music through the Lens of Electroacoustic Technology.’ The report detailed the beginnings of an effort to blend historically informed performance practice (specifically of Gregorian chant) with improvisatory techniques, scaffolded by electroacoustic ‘found sound’ techniques including looping, filtering and granulation…

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Science in Context 综合性期刊-科学史与科学哲学

CiteScore

0.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Science in Context is an international journal edited at The Cohn Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Ideas, Tel Aviv University, with the support of the Van Leer Jerusalem Institute. It is devoted to the study of the sciences from the points of view of comparative epistemology and historical sociology of scientific knowledge. The journal is committed to an interdisciplinary approach to the study of science and its cultural development - it does not segregate considerations drawn from history, philosophy and sociology. Controversies within scientific knowledge and debates about methodology are presented in their contexts.