{"title":"用于IPT应用的平面圆形和方形耦合器的综合比较研究","authors":"Jing Xiao, Xiaorui Wu, Wenlan Gong, Xiufang Liu, Shaonan Chen, Yousu Yao","doi":"10.1109/ITECAsia-Pacific56316.2022.9941959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Planar circular and square couplers (PCC and PSC) are two magnetic couplers that are most frequently employed in inductive power transfer (IPT) systems. However, PCC and PSC are not comprehensively compared. As a result, which coupler should be employed in a specific application is unclear. This paper compares PCC and PSC in terms of coupling coefficient, self-inductance factor, misalignment tolerance, coupler quality factor, cost, weight, and size. To make the comparison fair, PCC and PSC are firstly optimized. Two control IPT systems, one employing PCC while the other utilizing PSC, are built in PSIM. The advantages and disadvantages of PCC and PSC are further verified. PCC outperforms PSC in cost, weight, size, and coupler quality factor, but PSC performs better in coupling coefficient, self-inductance factor, and misalignment tolerance. Hence, PSC is preferable in most applications except rotating case.","PeriodicalId":45126,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal-Japan Focus","volume":"19 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comprehensive Comparison Study of Planar Circular and Square Couplers for IPT Applications\",\"authors\":\"Jing Xiao, Xiaorui Wu, Wenlan Gong, Xiufang Liu, Shaonan Chen, Yousu Yao\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ITECAsia-Pacific56316.2022.9941959\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Planar circular and square couplers (PCC and PSC) are two magnetic couplers that are most frequently employed in inductive power transfer (IPT) systems. However, PCC and PSC are not comprehensively compared. As a result, which coupler should be employed in a specific application is unclear. This paper compares PCC and PSC in terms of coupling coefficient, self-inductance factor, misalignment tolerance, coupler quality factor, cost, weight, and size. To make the comparison fair, PCC and PSC are firstly optimized. Two control IPT systems, one employing PCC while the other utilizing PSC, are built in PSIM. The advantages and disadvantages of PCC and PSC are further verified. PCC outperforms PSC in cost, weight, size, and coupler quality factor, but PSC performs better in coupling coefficient, self-inductance factor, and misalignment tolerance. Hence, PSC is preferable in most applications except rotating case.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal-Japan Focus\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal-Japan Focus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITECAsia-Pacific56316.2022.9941959\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal-Japan Focus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITECAsia-Pacific56316.2022.9941959","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Comprehensive Comparison Study of Planar Circular and Square Couplers for IPT Applications
Planar circular and square couplers (PCC and PSC) are two magnetic couplers that are most frequently employed in inductive power transfer (IPT) systems. However, PCC and PSC are not comprehensively compared. As a result, which coupler should be employed in a specific application is unclear. This paper compares PCC and PSC in terms of coupling coefficient, self-inductance factor, misalignment tolerance, coupler quality factor, cost, weight, and size. To make the comparison fair, PCC and PSC are firstly optimized. Two control IPT systems, one employing PCC while the other utilizing PSC, are built in PSIM. The advantages and disadvantages of PCC and PSC are further verified. PCC outperforms PSC in cost, weight, size, and coupler quality factor, but PSC performs better in coupling coefficient, self-inductance factor, and misalignment tolerance. Hence, PSC is preferable in most applications except rotating case.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
