学生篮球技战术方法与技术方法的比较

A. Gumilar, Alpi Pebria Lestari, B. Hambali, Article Info
{"title":"学生篮球技战术方法与技术方法的比较","authors":"A. Gumilar, Alpi Pebria Lestari, B. Hambali, Article Info","doi":"10.33369/jk.v7i2.27490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The tactical and technical approach model is an approach model that is often used in physical education, especially in game sports, one of which is basketball. This study aims to determine the different effects of tactical and technical learning models on students' understanding and skills in basketball. The method and design of this study used an experimental method with pre-test and post-test design groups. The research sample is composed of high school students, with a total of 48 students. 12 students using a technical approach and 12 tactical students The instrument uses GPAI (Games Performance Instrument Analysis). The results obtained (1) test the similarity of the average of the two skills obtained. 000 for technical and 0.000 for tactical, it can be concluded that the two models have significant differences in basketball playing skills. (2) Then the two models have different average values; the playing skills score of the tactical approach model is 0.67 and the technical approach model is 0.55. The difference between the two approach models shows that the tactical approach model has a significantly greater effect than the technical approach model.","PeriodicalId":17815,"journal":{"name":"Kinestetik : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Jasmani","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of Tactic and Technical Approaches to Student Basketball Skills\",\"authors\":\"A. Gumilar, Alpi Pebria Lestari, B. Hambali, Article Info\",\"doi\":\"10.33369/jk.v7i2.27490\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The tactical and technical approach model is an approach model that is often used in physical education, especially in game sports, one of which is basketball. This study aims to determine the different effects of tactical and technical learning models on students' understanding and skills in basketball. The method and design of this study used an experimental method with pre-test and post-test design groups. The research sample is composed of high school students, with a total of 48 students. 12 students using a technical approach and 12 tactical students The instrument uses GPAI (Games Performance Instrument Analysis). The results obtained (1) test the similarity of the average of the two skills obtained. 000 for technical and 0.000 for tactical, it can be concluded that the two models have significant differences in basketball playing skills. (2) Then the two models have different average values; the playing skills score of the tactical approach model is 0.67 and the technical approach model is 0.55. The difference between the two approach models shows that the tactical approach model has a significantly greater effect than the technical approach model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17815,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kinestetik : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Jasmani\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kinestetik : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Jasmani\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33369/jk.v7i2.27490\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kinestetik : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Jasmani","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33369/jk.v7i2.27490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

战术技术方法模型是体育教学特别是竞技体育教学中常用的一种方法模型,篮球就是其中之一。本研究旨在确定战术和技术学习模式对学生篮球理解和技能的不同影响。本研究的方法和设计采用前测组和后测组的实验方法。研究样本由高中生组成,共有48名学生。12名学生使用技术方法,12名学生使用战术方法。仪器使用GPAI(游戏性能仪器分析)。所得结果(1)检验所得两项技能平均值的相似度。技术得分为000,战术得分为0.000,可以看出两种模式在篮球运动技能上存在显著差异。(2)则两个模型的平均值不同;战术接近模型的球技得分为0.67,技术接近模型的球技得分为0.55。两种方法模型的差异表明,战术方法模型的效果明显大于技术方法模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparison of Tactic and Technical Approaches to Student Basketball Skills
The tactical and technical approach model is an approach model that is often used in physical education, especially in game sports, one of which is basketball. This study aims to determine the different effects of tactical and technical learning models on students' understanding and skills in basketball. The method and design of this study used an experimental method with pre-test and post-test design groups. The research sample is composed of high school students, with a total of 48 students. 12 students using a technical approach and 12 tactical students The instrument uses GPAI (Games Performance Instrument Analysis). The results obtained (1) test the similarity of the average of the two skills obtained. 000 for technical and 0.000 for tactical, it can be concluded that the two models have significant differences in basketball playing skills. (2) Then the two models have different average values; the playing skills score of the tactical approach model is 0.67 and the technical approach model is 0.55. The difference between the two approach models shows that the tactical approach model has a significantly greater effect than the technical approach model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信