从服务提供者和青少年的角度构建质量标准评估

IF 2.2 4区 社会学 Q2 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Elizabeth Hatch, K. Brown, R. Hollis, Sharlet Barnett, Kristopher Seydel, Kristin M. Ferguson
{"title":"从服务提供者和青少年的角度构建质量标准评估","authors":"Elizabeth Hatch, K. Brown, R. Hollis, Sharlet Barnett, Kristopher Seydel, Kristin M. Ferguson","doi":"10.1080/23303131.2022.2086954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Quality standards assessments (QSA) offer human service organizations a way to measure their performance and alignment with organizational goals and objectives. Using a case-study approach, this article demonstrates how one youth-serving coalition, aiming to provide comprehensive wrap around services, developed QSA surveys to operationalize coalition objectives and track their progress. From 2015 to 2016, this coalition created QSA surveys focusing on both provider- and youth-reported quality, each providing its own unique angle for the assessment. Factor analysis was used to identify two underlying dimensions of youth perceptions of quality, encompassing both interpersonal interactions and benefits of the services received. Correlation analyses uncovered associations between center designation and both provider- and youth-reported quality. Overall, the findings offer scholar-researchers and practitioners of human service organizations as well as youth-serving networks more broadly guides and tools for measuring service quality.","PeriodicalId":46043,"journal":{"name":"Human Service Organizations Management Leadership & Governance","volume":"6 1","pages":"309 - 323"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Constructing a Quality Standards Assessment with Service Provider and Youth Perspectives\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth Hatch, K. Brown, R. Hollis, Sharlet Barnett, Kristopher Seydel, Kristin M. Ferguson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23303131.2022.2086954\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Quality standards assessments (QSA) offer human service organizations a way to measure their performance and alignment with organizational goals and objectives. Using a case-study approach, this article demonstrates how one youth-serving coalition, aiming to provide comprehensive wrap around services, developed QSA surveys to operationalize coalition objectives and track their progress. From 2015 to 2016, this coalition created QSA surveys focusing on both provider- and youth-reported quality, each providing its own unique angle for the assessment. Factor analysis was used to identify two underlying dimensions of youth perceptions of quality, encompassing both interpersonal interactions and benefits of the services received. Correlation analyses uncovered associations between center designation and both provider- and youth-reported quality. Overall, the findings offer scholar-researchers and practitioners of human service organizations as well as youth-serving networks more broadly guides and tools for measuring service quality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Service Organizations Management Leadership & Governance\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"309 - 323\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Service Organizations Management Leadership & Governance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2022.2086954\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Service Organizations Management Leadership & Governance","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2022.2086954","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

质量标准评估(QSA)为人力服务组织提供了一种衡量其绩效和与组织目标一致的方法。本文采用案例研究方法,展示了一个旨在提供全面服务的青年服务联盟如何开发QSA调查,以实现联盟目标并跟踪其进展。从2015年到2016年,该联盟创建了QSA调查,重点关注供应商和年轻人报告的质量,每个调查都提供了自己独特的评估角度。因子分析用于确定青年对质量感知的两个基本维度,包括人际互动和所接受服务的好处。相关分析揭示了中心指定与提供者和年轻人报告的质量之间的关联。总的来说,研究结果为学者、研究人员和人类服务组织的实践者以及青年服务网络提供了更广泛的衡量服务质量的指导和工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Constructing a Quality Standards Assessment with Service Provider and Youth Perspectives
ABSTRACT Quality standards assessments (QSA) offer human service organizations a way to measure their performance and alignment with organizational goals and objectives. Using a case-study approach, this article demonstrates how one youth-serving coalition, aiming to provide comprehensive wrap around services, developed QSA surveys to operationalize coalition objectives and track their progress. From 2015 to 2016, this coalition created QSA surveys focusing on both provider- and youth-reported quality, each providing its own unique angle for the assessment. Factor analysis was used to identify two underlying dimensions of youth perceptions of quality, encompassing both interpersonal interactions and benefits of the services received. Correlation analyses uncovered associations between center designation and both provider- and youth-reported quality. Overall, the findings offer scholar-researchers and practitioners of human service organizations as well as youth-serving networks more broadly guides and tools for measuring service quality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信