{"title":"弱视儿童眼间抑制的定量研究","authors":"Hui Chen, Xinping Yu, D. Lin","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-845X.2019.10.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: \nTo assess the reliability and relevance of a new test of inter-ocular suppression for children with amblyopia, as well as its sensitivity and specificity for clinical use. \n \n \nMethods: \nIn this prospective study, inter-ocular suppression was measured quantitatively with polarized and neutral density filter lenses with visual targets both for near and distance, and then compared to the standard tests for suppression (Worth 4 dot, stereoacuity) in 29 amblyopic children (8.7±2.4 years) with strabismus, anisometropia, or a combination of both and 20 age-matched normal controls (8.0±1.9 years), from May 2014 to September 2017 in the Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University. To evaluate the correlation between measurement results and clinical characteristics of children in the amblyopia group, a Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test was used for analysis. A receiver operating characteristic curve was adopted to assess its reliability, sensitivity and specificity. \n \n \nResults: \nThere was no statistically significant difference between the performance of normal and amblyopic patients (Z=1.830, P=0.067; Z=0.653, P=0.514). Inter-ocular suppression with the Worth 4-dot test was used as the diagnostic criteria. The results showed that stronger inter-ocular suppression was found in amblyopes than in controls at both near (Z=2.974, P=0.003) and far distances (Z= 3.580, P<0.001). Using TNO and Optec 3500 as the diagnostic criteria, the results showed that stronger inter-ocular suppression was found in amblyopes than in controls at both near (Z=2.142, P=0.032) and far distances (Z=2.031, P=0.042). Inter-ocular suppression using the new test for diagnosis to distinguish between inhibition and non-inhibition showed the results were statistically significant for the diagnosis of differential inhibition and no inhibition. The results for the diagnostic criteria for the Worth 4-dot detection were: Near: AUC=0.824, 95%CI: 0.672-0.975, P=0.003; Far: AUC=0.911, 95%CI: 0.798-1.000, P<0.001; Diagnosis criteria for the TNO and Optec 3500 were: Near: AUC=0.878, 95%CI: 0.724-1.000, P=0.035; Far: AUC=0.926, 95%CI: 0.819-1.000, P=0.048). \n \n \nConclusions: \nGood reliability and agreement is suggested for the new quantitative measurement of suppression in children with amblyopia. The measured inter-ocular suppression is in agreement with other clinical measures. \n \n \nKey words: \namblyopia; inter-ocular suppression; quantitative detection; children","PeriodicalId":10142,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Optometry & Ophthalmology","volume":"94 1","pages":"734-739"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Quantitative Study of Inter-Ocular Suppression in Children with Amblyopia\",\"authors\":\"Hui Chen, Xinping Yu, D. Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-845X.2019.10.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: \\nTo assess the reliability and relevance of a new test of inter-ocular suppression for children with amblyopia, as well as its sensitivity and specificity for clinical use. \\n \\n \\nMethods: \\nIn this prospective study, inter-ocular suppression was measured quantitatively with polarized and neutral density filter lenses with visual targets both for near and distance, and then compared to the standard tests for suppression (Worth 4 dot, stereoacuity) in 29 amblyopic children (8.7±2.4 years) with strabismus, anisometropia, or a combination of both and 20 age-matched normal controls (8.0±1.9 years), from May 2014 to September 2017 in the Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University. To evaluate the correlation between measurement results and clinical characteristics of children in the amblyopia group, a Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test was used for analysis. A receiver operating characteristic curve was adopted to assess its reliability, sensitivity and specificity. \\n \\n \\nResults: \\nThere was no statistically significant difference between the performance of normal and amblyopic patients (Z=1.830, P=0.067; Z=0.653, P=0.514). Inter-ocular suppression with the Worth 4-dot test was used as the diagnostic criteria. The results showed that stronger inter-ocular suppression was found in amblyopes than in controls at both near (Z=2.974, P=0.003) and far distances (Z= 3.580, P<0.001). Using TNO and Optec 3500 as the diagnostic criteria, the results showed that stronger inter-ocular suppression was found in amblyopes than in controls at both near (Z=2.142, P=0.032) and far distances (Z=2.031, P=0.042). Inter-ocular suppression using the new test for diagnosis to distinguish between inhibition and non-inhibition showed the results were statistically significant for the diagnosis of differential inhibition and no inhibition. The results for the diagnostic criteria for the Worth 4-dot detection were: Near: AUC=0.824, 95%CI: 0.672-0.975, P=0.003; Far: AUC=0.911, 95%CI: 0.798-1.000, P<0.001; Diagnosis criteria for the TNO and Optec 3500 were: Near: AUC=0.878, 95%CI: 0.724-1.000, P=0.035; Far: AUC=0.926, 95%CI: 0.819-1.000, P=0.048). \\n \\n \\nConclusions: \\nGood reliability and agreement is suggested for the new quantitative measurement of suppression in children with amblyopia. The measured inter-ocular suppression is in agreement with other clinical measures. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\namblyopia; inter-ocular suppression; quantitative detection; children\",\"PeriodicalId\":10142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Journal of Optometry & Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"94 1\",\"pages\":\"734-739\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Journal of Optometry & Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-845X.2019.10.003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Optometry & Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-845X.2019.10.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Quantitative Study of Inter-Ocular Suppression in Children with Amblyopia
Objective:
To assess the reliability and relevance of a new test of inter-ocular suppression for children with amblyopia, as well as its sensitivity and specificity for clinical use.
Methods:
In this prospective study, inter-ocular suppression was measured quantitatively with polarized and neutral density filter lenses with visual targets both for near and distance, and then compared to the standard tests for suppression (Worth 4 dot, stereoacuity) in 29 amblyopic children (8.7±2.4 years) with strabismus, anisometropia, or a combination of both and 20 age-matched normal controls (8.0±1.9 years), from May 2014 to September 2017 in the Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University. To evaluate the correlation between measurement results and clinical characteristics of children in the amblyopia group, a Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test was used for analysis. A receiver operating characteristic curve was adopted to assess its reliability, sensitivity and specificity.
Results:
There was no statistically significant difference between the performance of normal and amblyopic patients (Z=1.830, P=0.067; Z=0.653, P=0.514). Inter-ocular suppression with the Worth 4-dot test was used as the diagnostic criteria. The results showed that stronger inter-ocular suppression was found in amblyopes than in controls at both near (Z=2.974, P=0.003) and far distances (Z= 3.580, P<0.001). Using TNO and Optec 3500 as the diagnostic criteria, the results showed that stronger inter-ocular suppression was found in amblyopes than in controls at both near (Z=2.142, P=0.032) and far distances (Z=2.031, P=0.042). Inter-ocular suppression using the new test for diagnosis to distinguish between inhibition and non-inhibition showed the results were statistically significant for the diagnosis of differential inhibition and no inhibition. The results for the diagnostic criteria for the Worth 4-dot detection were: Near: AUC=0.824, 95%CI: 0.672-0.975, P=0.003; Far: AUC=0.911, 95%CI: 0.798-1.000, P<0.001; Diagnosis criteria for the TNO and Optec 3500 were: Near: AUC=0.878, 95%CI: 0.724-1.000, P=0.035; Far: AUC=0.926, 95%CI: 0.819-1.000, P=0.048).
Conclusions:
Good reliability and agreement is suggested for the new quantitative measurement of suppression in children with amblyopia. The measured inter-ocular suppression is in agreement with other clinical measures.
Key words:
amblyopia; inter-ocular suppression; quantitative detection; children