弱视儿童眼间抑制的定量研究

Hui Chen, Xinping Yu, D. Lin
{"title":"弱视儿童眼间抑制的定量研究","authors":"Hui Chen, Xinping Yu, D. Lin","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-845X.2019.10.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: \nTo assess the reliability and relevance of a new test of inter-ocular suppression for children with amblyopia, as well as its sensitivity and specificity for clinical use. \n \n \nMethods: \nIn this prospective study, inter-ocular suppression was measured quantitatively with polarized and neutral density filter lenses with visual targets both for near and distance, and then compared to the standard tests for suppression (Worth 4 dot, stereoacuity) in 29 amblyopic children (8.7±2.4 years) with strabismus, anisometropia, or a combination of both and 20 age-matched normal controls (8.0±1.9 years), from May 2014 to September 2017 in the Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University. To evaluate the correlation between measurement results and clinical characteristics of children in the amblyopia group, a Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test was used for analysis. A receiver operating characteristic curve was adopted to assess its reliability, sensitivity and specificity. \n \n \nResults: \nThere was no statistically significant difference between the performance of normal and amblyopic patients (Z=1.830, P=0.067; Z=0.653, P=0.514). Inter-ocular suppression with the Worth 4-dot test was used as the diagnostic criteria. The results showed that stronger inter-ocular suppression was found in amblyopes than in controls at both near (Z=2.974, P=0.003) and far distances (Z= 3.580, P<0.001). Using TNO and Optec 3500 as the diagnostic criteria, the results showed that stronger inter-ocular suppression was found in amblyopes than in controls at both near (Z=2.142, P=0.032) and far distances (Z=2.031, P=0.042). Inter-ocular suppression using the new test for diagnosis to distinguish between inhibition and non-inhibition showed the results were statistically significant for the diagnosis of differential inhibition and no inhibition. The results for the diagnostic criteria for the Worth 4-dot detection were: Near: AUC=0.824, 95%CI: 0.672-0.975, P=0.003; Far: AUC=0.911, 95%CI: 0.798-1.000, P<0.001; Diagnosis criteria for the TNO and Optec 3500 were: Near: AUC=0.878, 95%CI: 0.724-1.000, P=0.035; Far: AUC=0.926, 95%CI: 0.819-1.000, P=0.048). \n \n \nConclusions: \nGood reliability and agreement is suggested for the new quantitative measurement of suppression in children with amblyopia. The measured inter-ocular suppression is in agreement with other clinical measures. \n \n \nKey words: \namblyopia; inter-ocular suppression; quantitative detection; children","PeriodicalId":10142,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Optometry & Ophthalmology","volume":"94 1","pages":"734-739"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Quantitative Study of Inter-Ocular Suppression in Children with Amblyopia\",\"authors\":\"Hui Chen, Xinping Yu, D. Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-845X.2019.10.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: \\nTo assess the reliability and relevance of a new test of inter-ocular suppression for children with amblyopia, as well as its sensitivity and specificity for clinical use. \\n \\n \\nMethods: \\nIn this prospective study, inter-ocular suppression was measured quantitatively with polarized and neutral density filter lenses with visual targets both for near and distance, and then compared to the standard tests for suppression (Worth 4 dot, stereoacuity) in 29 amblyopic children (8.7±2.4 years) with strabismus, anisometropia, or a combination of both and 20 age-matched normal controls (8.0±1.9 years), from May 2014 to September 2017 in the Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University. To evaluate the correlation between measurement results and clinical characteristics of children in the amblyopia group, a Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test was used for analysis. A receiver operating characteristic curve was adopted to assess its reliability, sensitivity and specificity. \\n \\n \\nResults: \\nThere was no statistically significant difference between the performance of normal and amblyopic patients (Z=1.830, P=0.067; Z=0.653, P=0.514). Inter-ocular suppression with the Worth 4-dot test was used as the diagnostic criteria. The results showed that stronger inter-ocular suppression was found in amblyopes than in controls at both near (Z=2.974, P=0.003) and far distances (Z= 3.580, P<0.001). Using TNO and Optec 3500 as the diagnostic criteria, the results showed that stronger inter-ocular suppression was found in amblyopes than in controls at both near (Z=2.142, P=0.032) and far distances (Z=2.031, P=0.042). Inter-ocular suppression using the new test for diagnosis to distinguish between inhibition and non-inhibition showed the results were statistically significant for the diagnosis of differential inhibition and no inhibition. The results for the diagnostic criteria for the Worth 4-dot detection were: Near: AUC=0.824, 95%CI: 0.672-0.975, P=0.003; Far: AUC=0.911, 95%CI: 0.798-1.000, P<0.001; Diagnosis criteria for the TNO and Optec 3500 were: Near: AUC=0.878, 95%CI: 0.724-1.000, P=0.035; Far: AUC=0.926, 95%CI: 0.819-1.000, P=0.048). \\n \\n \\nConclusions: \\nGood reliability and agreement is suggested for the new quantitative measurement of suppression in children with amblyopia. The measured inter-ocular suppression is in agreement with other clinical measures. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\namblyopia; inter-ocular suppression; quantitative detection; children\",\"PeriodicalId\":10142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Journal of Optometry & Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"94 1\",\"pages\":\"734-739\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Journal of Optometry & Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-845X.2019.10.003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Optometry & Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-845X.2019.10.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:评价弱视儿童眼间抑制新检测方法的可靠性和相关性,以及临床应用的敏感性和特异性。方法:本前瞻性研究于2014年5月至2017年9月在温州医科大学眼科医院接受29例(8.7±2.4岁)斜视、屈光参差或两者兼有的弱视儿童和20例(8.0±1.9岁)年龄匹配的正常对照,采用偏光和中性密度滤光片定量测量近距离和远距离视觉目标的眼间抑制,并与标准的抑制(Worth 4点、立体视敏)测试进行比较。为评价测量结果与弱视组儿童临床特征的相关性,采用Wilcoxon符号秩和检验进行分析。采用受试者工作特征曲线评价其信度、灵敏度和特异性。结果:正常与弱视患者的视力表现差异无统计学意义(Z=1.830, P=0.067;Z = 0.653, P = 0.514)。眼间抑制与Worth 4点试验作为诊断标准。结果显示,在近距离(Z=2.974, P=0.003)和远距离(Z= 3.580, P<0.001),弱视患者的眼间抑制均强于对照组。以TNO和Optec 3500作为诊断标准,结果显示,在近距离(Z=2.142, P=0.032)和远距离(Z=2.031, P=0.042),弱视患者的眼间抑制均明显高于对照组。眼间抑制使用新的诊断测试来区分抑制和非抑制,结果对鉴别抑制和无抑制的诊断具有统计学意义。Worth 4点检测法的诊断标准为:Near: AUC=0.824, 95%CI: 0.672 ~ 0.975, P=0.003;Far: AUC=0.911, 95%CI: 0.798-1.000, P<0.001;TNO和Optec 3500的诊断标准为:Near: AUC=0.878, 95%CI: 0.724 ~ 1.000, P=0.035;Far: AUC=0.926, 95%CI: 0.819-1.000, P=0.048)。结论:对儿童弱视抑制的新定量测量方法具有良好的可靠性和一致性。测量的眼间抑制与其他临床测量结果一致。关键词:弱视;inter-ocular抑制;定量检测;孩子们
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Quantitative Study of Inter-Ocular Suppression in Children with Amblyopia
Objective: To assess the reliability and relevance of a new test of inter-ocular suppression for children with amblyopia, as well as its sensitivity and specificity for clinical use. Methods: In this prospective study, inter-ocular suppression was measured quantitatively with polarized and neutral density filter lenses with visual targets both for near and distance, and then compared to the standard tests for suppression (Worth 4 dot, stereoacuity) in 29 amblyopic children (8.7±2.4 years) with strabismus, anisometropia, or a combination of both and 20 age-matched normal controls (8.0±1.9 years), from May 2014 to September 2017 in the Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University. To evaluate the correlation between measurement results and clinical characteristics of children in the amblyopia group, a Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test was used for analysis. A receiver operating characteristic curve was adopted to assess its reliability, sensitivity and specificity. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the performance of normal and amblyopic patients (Z=1.830, P=0.067; Z=0.653, P=0.514). Inter-ocular suppression with the Worth 4-dot test was used as the diagnostic criteria. The results showed that stronger inter-ocular suppression was found in amblyopes than in controls at both near (Z=2.974, P=0.003) and far distances (Z= 3.580, P<0.001). Using TNO and Optec 3500 as the diagnostic criteria, the results showed that stronger inter-ocular suppression was found in amblyopes than in controls at both near (Z=2.142, P=0.032) and far distances (Z=2.031, P=0.042). Inter-ocular suppression using the new test for diagnosis to distinguish between inhibition and non-inhibition showed the results were statistically significant for the diagnosis of differential inhibition and no inhibition. The results for the diagnostic criteria for the Worth 4-dot detection were: Near: AUC=0.824, 95%CI: 0.672-0.975, P=0.003; Far: AUC=0.911, 95%CI: 0.798-1.000, P<0.001; Diagnosis criteria for the TNO and Optec 3500 were: Near: AUC=0.878, 95%CI: 0.724-1.000, P=0.035; Far: AUC=0.926, 95%CI: 0.819-1.000, P=0.048). Conclusions: Good reliability and agreement is suggested for the new quantitative measurement of suppression in children with amblyopia. The measured inter-ocular suppression is in agreement with other clinical measures. Key words: amblyopia; inter-ocular suppression; quantitative detection; children
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信