数学模型预测与吉尔吉斯斯坦全国封锁后COVID-19疫情的实际过程

Ainura Moldokmatova, Aida Estebesova, Aizhan Dooronbekova, C. Zhumalieva, Aibek Mukambetov, T. Abdyldaev, Aisuluu Kubatova, S. Ibragimov, N. Usenbaev, Ainura Kutmanova, Lisa J. White
{"title":"数学模型预测与吉尔吉斯斯坦全国封锁后COVID-19疫情的实际过程","authors":"Ainura Moldokmatova, Aida Estebesova, Aizhan Dooronbekova, C. Zhumalieva, Aibek Mukambetov, T. Abdyldaev, Aisuluu Kubatova, S. Ibragimov, N. Usenbaev, Ainura Kutmanova, Lisa J. White","doi":"10.1101/2020.12.10.20247247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Kyrgyzstan was placed under a two-month, nationwide lockdown due to the COVID-19 epidemic, starting on March 25, 2020. Given the highly disruptive effects of the lockdown on the national economy and lives of people, the government decided not to extend lockdown beyond the initially planned date of May 10, 2020. The strategy chosen by the government was close to the input parameters of our model baseline scenario (full lockdown release) which we presented to policymakers in April 2020, along with various other hypothetical scenarios with managed lockdown release options. To explore whether our model could accurately predict the actual course of the epidemic following the release of lockdown, we compared the outputs of the baseline scenario, such as new cases, deaths, and demand for and occupancy of hospital beds, with actual official reports. Our analysis revealed that the model could accurately predict the timing of the epidemic peak, with a difference of just two weeks, although the magnitude of the peak was overestimated compared with the official statistics. However, it is important to note that the accuracy of the official reports remains debatable, so outputs relating to the size of the epidemic and related pressures on the health system will need to be updated if new evidence becomes available.","PeriodicalId":15066,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biotechnology and Biomedicine","volume":"214 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mathematical modelling projections versus the actual course of the COVID-19 epidemic following the nationwide lockdown in Kyrgyzstan\",\"authors\":\"Ainura Moldokmatova, Aida Estebesova, Aizhan Dooronbekova, C. Zhumalieva, Aibek Mukambetov, T. Abdyldaev, Aisuluu Kubatova, S. Ibragimov, N. Usenbaev, Ainura Kutmanova, Lisa J. White\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2020.12.10.20247247\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Kyrgyzstan was placed under a two-month, nationwide lockdown due to the COVID-19 epidemic, starting on March 25, 2020. Given the highly disruptive effects of the lockdown on the national economy and lives of people, the government decided not to extend lockdown beyond the initially planned date of May 10, 2020. The strategy chosen by the government was close to the input parameters of our model baseline scenario (full lockdown release) which we presented to policymakers in April 2020, along with various other hypothetical scenarios with managed lockdown release options. To explore whether our model could accurately predict the actual course of the epidemic following the release of lockdown, we compared the outputs of the baseline scenario, such as new cases, deaths, and demand for and occupancy of hospital beds, with actual official reports. Our analysis revealed that the model could accurately predict the timing of the epidemic peak, with a difference of just two weeks, although the magnitude of the peak was overestimated compared with the official statistics. However, it is important to note that the accuracy of the official reports remains debatable, so outputs relating to the size of the epidemic and related pressures on the health system will need to be updated if new evidence becomes available.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biotechnology and Biomedicine\",\"volume\":\"214 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biotechnology and Biomedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.10.20247247\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biotechnology and Biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.10.20247247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

自2020年3月25日起,吉尔吉斯斯坦因新冠肺炎疫情被全国封锁两个月。考虑到封锁对国民经济和人民生活的破坏性影响,政府决定不再将封锁延长至原定的2020年5月10日之后。政府选择的策略接近我们在2020年4月向政策制定者提出的模型基线情景(完全封锁释放)的输入参数,以及其他各种具有管理封锁释放选项的假设情景。为了探索我们的模型是否能够准确预测封锁解除后疫情的实际进程,我们将基线情景的输出(如新病例、死亡、医院床位的需求和占用情况)与实际的官方报告进行了比较。我们的分析表明,该模型可以准确预测疫情高峰的时间,误差仅为两周,尽管与官方统计数据相比,高峰的幅度被高估了。然而,必须指出的是,官方报告的准确性仍有争议,因此,如果获得新的证据,将需要更新与流行病规模和卫生系统相关压力有关的产出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mathematical modelling projections versus the actual course of the COVID-19 epidemic following the nationwide lockdown in Kyrgyzstan
Kyrgyzstan was placed under a two-month, nationwide lockdown due to the COVID-19 epidemic, starting on March 25, 2020. Given the highly disruptive effects of the lockdown on the national economy and lives of people, the government decided not to extend lockdown beyond the initially planned date of May 10, 2020. The strategy chosen by the government was close to the input parameters of our model baseline scenario (full lockdown release) which we presented to policymakers in April 2020, along with various other hypothetical scenarios with managed lockdown release options. To explore whether our model could accurately predict the actual course of the epidemic following the release of lockdown, we compared the outputs of the baseline scenario, such as new cases, deaths, and demand for and occupancy of hospital beds, with actual official reports. Our analysis revealed that the model could accurately predict the timing of the epidemic peak, with a difference of just two weeks, although the magnitude of the peak was overestimated compared with the official statistics. However, it is important to note that the accuracy of the official reports remains debatable, so outputs relating to the size of the epidemic and related pressures on the health system will need to be updated if new evidence becomes available.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信