Jason-2等离子层电子含量测量与地面测量的比较

IF 1.7 4区 地球科学 Q3 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Andrew J. Mazzella Jr., E. Yizengaw
{"title":"Jason-2等离子层电子含量测量与地面测量的比较","authors":"Andrew J. Mazzella Jr., E. Yizengaw","doi":"10.5194/angeo-41-269-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Previous studies utilizing the Global Positioning System\n(GPS) receivers aboard Jason satellites have performed measurements of\nplasmasphere electron content (PEC) by determining the total electron\ncontent (TEC) above these satellites, which are at altitudes of about 1340 km. This study uses similar methods to determine PEC for the Jason-2\nreceiver for 24 July 2011. These PEC values are compared to previous\ndeterminations of PEC from a chain of ground-based GPS receivers in Africa\nusing the SCORPION method, with a nominal ionosphere–plasmasphere boundary\nat 1000 km. The Jason-2 PECs with elevations greater than 60∘\nwere converted to equivalent vertical PEC and compared to SCORPION vertical\nPEC determinations. In addition, slant (off-vertical) PECs from Jason-2\nwere compared to a small set of nearly co-aligned ground-based slant PECs.\nThe latter comparison avoids any conversion of Jason-2 slant PEC to\nequivalent vertical PEC, and it can be considered a more representative\ncomparison. The mean difference between the vertical PEC (ground-based\nminus Jason-2 measurements) values is 0.82 ± 0.28 TEC units (1 TEC unit=1016 electrons m−2). Similarly, the mean difference\nbetween slant PEC values is 0.168 ± 0.924 TEC units. The Jason-2 slant\nPEC comparison method may provide a reliable determination for the\nplasmasphere baseline value for the ground-based receivers, especially if\nthe ground stations are confined to only midlatitude or low-latitude\nregions, which can be affected by a non-negligible PEC baseline.\n","PeriodicalId":50777,"journal":{"name":"Annales Geophysicae","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of Jason-2 plasmasphere electron content measurements with ground-based measurements\",\"authors\":\"Andrew J. Mazzella Jr., E. Yizengaw\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/angeo-41-269-2023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. Previous studies utilizing the Global Positioning System\\n(GPS) receivers aboard Jason satellites have performed measurements of\\nplasmasphere electron content (PEC) by determining the total electron\\ncontent (TEC) above these satellites, which are at altitudes of about 1340 km. This study uses similar methods to determine PEC for the Jason-2\\nreceiver for 24 July 2011. These PEC values are compared to previous\\ndeterminations of PEC from a chain of ground-based GPS receivers in Africa\\nusing the SCORPION method, with a nominal ionosphere–plasmasphere boundary\\nat 1000 km. The Jason-2 PECs with elevations greater than 60∘\\nwere converted to equivalent vertical PEC and compared to SCORPION vertical\\nPEC determinations. In addition, slant (off-vertical) PECs from Jason-2\\nwere compared to a small set of nearly co-aligned ground-based slant PECs.\\nThe latter comparison avoids any conversion of Jason-2 slant PEC to\\nequivalent vertical PEC, and it can be considered a more representative\\ncomparison. The mean difference between the vertical PEC (ground-based\\nminus Jason-2 measurements) values is 0.82 ± 0.28 TEC units (1 TEC unit=1016 electrons m−2). Similarly, the mean difference\\nbetween slant PEC values is 0.168 ± 0.924 TEC units. The Jason-2 slant\\nPEC comparison method may provide a reliable determination for the\\nplasmasphere baseline value for the ground-based receivers, especially if\\nthe ground stations are confined to only midlatitude or low-latitude\\nregions, which can be affected by a non-negligible PEC baseline.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":50777,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annales Geophysicae\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annales Geophysicae\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-269-2023\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales Geophysicae","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-269-2023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要先前的研究利用Jason卫星上的全球定位系统(GPS)接收器进行了等离子层电子含量(PEC)的测量,通过确定这些卫星上的总电子含量(TEC),这些卫星位于大约1340公里的高度。本研究使用类似的方法确定2011年7月24日jason -2接收器的PEC。将这些PEC值与以前在非洲使用SCORPION方法从地面GPS接收器链获得的PEC值进行比较,该方法具有标称电离层-等离子层边界在1000公里处。高度大于60°的Jason-2型PEC被转换成等效的垂直PEC,并与SCORPION的垂直PEC测定值进行比较。此外,将jason -2的倾斜(非垂直)PECs与一小组几乎对齐的地面倾斜PECs进行了比较。后一种比较避免了将Jason-2倾斜PEC转换为等效的垂直PEC,它可以被认为是一种更具代表性的比较。垂直PEC(地面减去Jason-2测量值)值之间的平均差为0.82±0.28 TEC单位(1 TEC单位=1016电子m−2)。同样,斜向PEC值之间的平均差异为0.168±0.924 TEC单位。Jason-2斜PEC比较方法可以为地基接收机提供可靠的等离子层基线值测定,特别是当地面站仅局限于中纬度或低纬度地区时,这些地区可能受到不可忽略的PEC基线的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparison of Jason-2 plasmasphere electron content measurements with ground-based measurements
Abstract. Previous studies utilizing the Global Positioning System (GPS) receivers aboard Jason satellites have performed measurements of plasmasphere electron content (PEC) by determining the total electron content (TEC) above these satellites, which are at altitudes of about 1340 km. This study uses similar methods to determine PEC for the Jason-2 receiver for 24 July 2011. These PEC values are compared to previous determinations of PEC from a chain of ground-based GPS receivers in Africa using the SCORPION method, with a nominal ionosphere–plasmasphere boundary at 1000 km. The Jason-2 PECs with elevations greater than 60∘ were converted to equivalent vertical PEC and compared to SCORPION vertical PEC determinations. In addition, slant (off-vertical) PECs from Jason-2 were compared to a small set of nearly co-aligned ground-based slant PECs. The latter comparison avoids any conversion of Jason-2 slant PEC to equivalent vertical PEC, and it can be considered a more representative comparison. The mean difference between the vertical PEC (ground-based minus Jason-2 measurements) values is 0.82 ± 0.28 TEC units (1 TEC unit=1016 electrons m−2). Similarly, the mean difference between slant PEC values is 0.168 ± 0.924 TEC units. The Jason-2 slant PEC comparison method may provide a reliable determination for the plasmasphere baseline value for the ground-based receivers, especially if the ground stations are confined to only midlatitude or low-latitude regions, which can be affected by a non-negligible PEC baseline.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annales Geophysicae
Annales Geophysicae 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Annales Geophysicae (ANGEO) is a not-for-profit international multi- and inter-disciplinary scientific open-access journal in the field of solar–terrestrial and planetary sciences. ANGEO publishes original articles and short communications (letters) on research of the Sun–Earth system, including the science of space weather, solar–terrestrial plasma physics, the Earth''s ionosphere and atmosphere, the magnetosphere, and the study of planets and planetary systems, the interaction between the different spheres of a planet, and the interaction across the planetary system. Topics range from space weathering, planetary magnetic field, and planetary interior and surface dynamics to the formation and evolution of planetary systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信