中国互联网企业的文化创业与政策互动:腾讯“新文化创意”战略案例

Baoyi Guo , Jiaqi Liu
{"title":"中国互联网企业的文化创业与政策互动:腾讯“新文化创意”战略案例","authors":"Baoyi Guo ,&nbsp;Jiaqi Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.digbus.2021.100015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article studies interactions between Internet companies and the Chinese government within the cultural policy niche through a case study of Tencent’s “Neo-Culture Creativity” strategy. By empirically investigating the correlations between Tencent’s business actions and Chinese cultural policy changes during 2011–2019, and further disclosing their causality via a within-case process tracing, our findings are threefold. Firstly, around an “IP” idea and a content franchise model, Tencent has joined the policymaking process by providing problem solutions and exerting public pressure to influence the agenda setting of intellectual property rights protection. Secondly, Tencent has effectively adhered to the country’s calls of rejuvenating traditional Chinese culture and improving its international competitiveness to some extent. Thirdly, responding to China’s post-socialist sovereignty, Tencent has collaborated and compromised with the government on issues surrounding digital cultural governance by both precautions and remedies. Hence there are implications for Chinese cultural companies to interact with government policies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100376,"journal":{"name":"Digital Business","volume":"1 2","pages":"Article 100015"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.digbus.2021.100015","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Internet companies’ cultural entrepreneurialism and policy interactions in China: Tencent’s case of “Neo-Culture Creativity” strategy\",\"authors\":\"Baoyi Guo ,&nbsp;Jiaqi Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.digbus.2021.100015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This article studies interactions between Internet companies and the Chinese government within the cultural policy niche through a case study of Tencent’s “Neo-Culture Creativity” strategy. By empirically investigating the correlations between Tencent’s business actions and Chinese cultural policy changes during 2011–2019, and further disclosing their causality via a within-case process tracing, our findings are threefold. Firstly, around an “IP” idea and a content franchise model, Tencent has joined the policymaking process by providing problem solutions and exerting public pressure to influence the agenda setting of intellectual property rights protection. Secondly, Tencent has effectively adhered to the country’s calls of rejuvenating traditional Chinese culture and improving its international competitiveness to some extent. Thirdly, responding to China’s post-socialist sovereignty, Tencent has collaborated and compromised with the government on issues surrounding digital cultural governance by both precautions and remedies. Hence there are implications for Chinese cultural companies to interact with government policies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100376,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digital Business\",\"volume\":\"1 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100015\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.digbus.2021.100015\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digital Business\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666954421000144\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666954421000144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文以腾讯的“新文化创意”战略为例,研究互联网企业与中国政府在文化政策利基中的互动关系。通过实证调查2011-2019年腾讯商业行为与中国文化政策变化之间的相关性,并通过个案过程追踪进一步揭示其因果关系,我们的发现有三个方面。首先,围绕“IP”理念和内容特许经营模式,腾讯通过提供问题解决方案和施加公众压力来影响知识产权保护议程的制定,从而参与到政策制定过程中。其次,腾讯在一定程度上有效地响应了国家振兴中华传统文化和提高国际竞争力的号召。第三,为了应对中国后社会主义的主权,腾讯在数字文化治理方面与政府进行了合作和妥协,采取了预防和补救措施。因此,这对中国文化企业与政府政策互动具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Internet companies’ cultural entrepreneurialism and policy interactions in China: Tencent’s case of “Neo-Culture Creativity” strategy

This article studies interactions between Internet companies and the Chinese government within the cultural policy niche through a case study of Tencent’s “Neo-Culture Creativity” strategy. By empirically investigating the correlations between Tencent’s business actions and Chinese cultural policy changes during 2011–2019, and further disclosing their causality via a within-case process tracing, our findings are threefold. Firstly, around an “IP” idea and a content franchise model, Tencent has joined the policymaking process by providing problem solutions and exerting public pressure to influence the agenda setting of intellectual property rights protection. Secondly, Tencent has effectively adhered to the country’s calls of rejuvenating traditional Chinese culture and improving its international competitiveness to some extent. Thirdly, responding to China’s post-socialist sovereignty, Tencent has collaborated and compromised with the government on issues surrounding digital cultural governance by both precautions and remedies. Hence there are implications for Chinese cultural companies to interact with government policies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信