让我们谈谈精神病。

Q4 Medicine
A. Steele, P. Chadwick, R. McCabe
{"title":"让我们谈谈精神病。","authors":"A. Steele, P. Chadwick, R. McCabe","doi":"10.3371/csrp.ST.123015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nResearch suggests that while patients wish to talk about positive psychotic symptoms, psychiatrists may be reluctant to do so in routine outpatient consultations.\n\n\nAIMS\nTo explore the content, context and impact of discussion of positive symptoms within psychiatric consultations.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThematic analysis was applied to first discussions of positive symptoms, and overall impact assessed on the length of the consultation and the therapeutic relationship.\n\n\nRESULTS\nSixty-five of 143 consultations contained discussion of a positive psychotic symptom. Symptom discussion neither harmed the therapeutic relationship nor lengthened the consultation. Patients' disclosures strongly corresponded with psychological models of psychosis, emphasizing personal meaning and emotional impact. In contrast, psychiatrists focused on topographical characteristics, such as frequency and location. Strengths in psychiatric practice included using open questions, positive reinforcement and offering explanations tentatively.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nFindings support discussion of positive symptoms within outpatient consultations, to include necessary assessment of topography and risk alongside exploration of patients' subjective experience.","PeriodicalId":40019,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Let's Talk About Psychosis.\",\"authors\":\"A. Steele, P. Chadwick, R. McCabe\",\"doi\":\"10.3371/csrp.ST.123015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nResearch suggests that while patients wish to talk about positive psychotic symptoms, psychiatrists may be reluctant to do so in routine outpatient consultations.\\n\\n\\nAIMS\\nTo explore the content, context and impact of discussion of positive symptoms within psychiatric consultations.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nThematic analysis was applied to first discussions of positive symptoms, and overall impact assessed on the length of the consultation and the therapeutic relationship.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nSixty-five of 143 consultations contained discussion of a positive psychotic symptom. Symptom discussion neither harmed the therapeutic relationship nor lengthened the consultation. Patients' disclosures strongly corresponded with psychological models of psychosis, emphasizing personal meaning and emotional impact. In contrast, psychiatrists focused on topographical characteristics, such as frequency and location. Strengths in psychiatric practice included using open questions, positive reinforcement and offering explanations tentatively.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nFindings support discussion of positive symptoms within outpatient consultations, to include necessary assessment of topography and risk alongside exploration of patients' subjective experience.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3371/csrp.ST.123015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3371/csrp.ST.123015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

研究表明,当患者希望谈论阳性精神病症状时,精神科医生可能不愿意在常规门诊会诊中这样做。目的探讨精神科会诊中讨论阳性症状的内容、背景和影响。方法对首次讨论阳性症状的患者进行专题分析,并对会诊时间和治疗关系的总体影响进行评估。结果143例问诊中有65例讨论了阳性精神病症状。症状讨论既不损害治疗关系,也不延长会诊时间。患者的披露与精神病的心理模型密切相关,强调个人意义和情感影响。相比之下,精神科医生关注的是地形特征,比如频率和位置。精神病学实践的优势包括使用开放式问题,积极强化和提供试探性解释。结论:研究结果支持在门诊会诊中讨论阳性症状,包括必要的地形和风险评估以及患者主观经验的探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Let's Talk About Psychosis.
BACKGROUND Research suggests that while patients wish to talk about positive psychotic symptoms, psychiatrists may be reluctant to do so in routine outpatient consultations. AIMS To explore the content, context and impact of discussion of positive symptoms within psychiatric consultations. METHODS Thematic analysis was applied to first discussions of positive symptoms, and overall impact assessed on the length of the consultation and the therapeutic relationship. RESULTS Sixty-five of 143 consultations contained discussion of a positive psychotic symptom. Symptom discussion neither harmed the therapeutic relationship nor lengthened the consultation. Patients' disclosures strongly corresponded with psychological models of psychosis, emphasizing personal meaning and emotional impact. In contrast, psychiatrists focused on topographical characteristics, such as frequency and location. Strengths in psychiatric practice included using open questions, positive reinforcement and offering explanations tentatively. CONCLUSIONS Findings support discussion of positive symptoms within outpatient consultations, to include necessary assessment of topography and risk alongside exploration of patients' subjective experience.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses
Clinical Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The vision of the exciting new peer-reviewed quarterly publication Clinical Schizophrenia & Related Psychoses (CS) is to provide psychiatrists and other healthcare professionals with the latest research and advances in the diagnosis and treatment of schizophrenia and related psychoses. CS is a practice-oriented publication focused exclusively on the newest research findings, guidelines, treatment protocols, and clinical trials relevant to patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信