做福柯教练:将后结构假设转化为教练实践

IF 2.7 Q2 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM
J. Mills, B. Gearity, C. Kuklick, Jordan Bible
{"title":"做福柯教练:将后结构假设转化为教练实践","authors":"J. Mills, B. Gearity, C. Kuklick, Jordan Bible","doi":"10.1080/21640629.2022.2057696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Foucauldian-inspired coaching practices have been a recent focus in the Foucauldian coaching studies literature. There can be no denying the emergence of a number of ethical coaching practices in synergy with Foucault’s work, yet in most coaches’ everyday practices there appears to have been little uptake. Accordingly, our central concern in this paper is considering how Foucault’s work could become a more deliberate feature of coaching. Using Thomas Kuhn’s concept of paradigms, we argue that more significant change is yet to occur because coach education does not include the post-structural paradigmatic assumptions underpinning Foucault’s work. As a result, coaches immersed in a modern disciplinary logic may interpret Foucauldian-inspired practices through incommensurable assumptions. In this paper, we develop numerous post-structural assumptions into coaching post-structural praxis (CPSP) to demonstrate what those assumptions mean for coaches’ knowledge and practice.","PeriodicalId":43190,"journal":{"name":"Sports Coaching Review","volume":"45 5 1","pages":"192 - 212"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Making Foucault coach: turning post-structural assumptions into coaching praxis\",\"authors\":\"J. Mills, B. Gearity, C. Kuklick, Jordan Bible\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21640629.2022.2057696\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Foucauldian-inspired coaching practices have been a recent focus in the Foucauldian coaching studies literature. There can be no denying the emergence of a number of ethical coaching practices in synergy with Foucault’s work, yet in most coaches’ everyday practices there appears to have been little uptake. Accordingly, our central concern in this paper is considering how Foucault’s work could become a more deliberate feature of coaching. Using Thomas Kuhn’s concept of paradigms, we argue that more significant change is yet to occur because coach education does not include the post-structural paradigmatic assumptions underpinning Foucault’s work. As a result, coaches immersed in a modern disciplinary logic may interpret Foucauldian-inspired practices through incommensurable assumptions. In this paper, we develop numerous post-structural assumptions into coaching post-structural praxis (CPSP) to demonstrate what those assumptions mean for coaches’ knowledge and practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sports Coaching Review\",\"volume\":\"45 5 1\",\"pages\":\"192 - 212\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sports Coaching Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21640629.2022.2057696\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Coaching Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21640629.2022.2057696","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

摘要傅科德启发的教练实践是近年来傅科德教练研究文献中的一个焦点。不可否认的是,在福柯的工作的协同作用下,出现了许多道德教练实践,但在大多数教练的日常实践中,似乎很少有人接受。因此,我们在本文中关注的中心问题是考虑福柯的工作如何成为教练的一个更深思熟虑的特征。利用托马斯·库恩的范式概念,我们认为更重大的变化尚未发生,因为教练教育不包括支撑福柯工作的后结构范式假设。因此,沉浸在现代学科逻辑中的教练可能会通过不可通约的假设来解释福柯式的实践。在本文中,我们将许多后结构假设发展为教练后结构实践(CPSP),以证明这些假设对教练的知识和实践意味着什么。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Making Foucault coach: turning post-structural assumptions into coaching praxis
ABSTRACT Foucauldian-inspired coaching practices have been a recent focus in the Foucauldian coaching studies literature. There can be no denying the emergence of a number of ethical coaching practices in synergy with Foucault’s work, yet in most coaches’ everyday practices there appears to have been little uptake. Accordingly, our central concern in this paper is considering how Foucault’s work could become a more deliberate feature of coaching. Using Thomas Kuhn’s concept of paradigms, we argue that more significant change is yet to occur because coach education does not include the post-structural paradigmatic assumptions underpinning Foucault’s work. As a result, coaches immersed in a modern disciplinary logic may interpret Foucauldian-inspired practices through incommensurable assumptions. In this paper, we develop numerous post-structural assumptions into coaching post-structural praxis (CPSP) to demonstrate what those assumptions mean for coaches’ knowledge and practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sports Coaching Review
Sports Coaching Review HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
19.00%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信